Michael Guarnieri1, Esperanza Diaz2, Daniel Pope3, Ellen A Eisen4, Jennifer Mann4, Kirk R Smith4, Tone Smith-Sivertsen5, Nigel G Bruce3, John R Balmes6. 1. Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA. 2. Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway. 3. Department of Public Health and Policy, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, England. 4. School of Public Health, Environmental Sciences, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, Norway. 5. Research Unit for General Practice, Uni Research Health, Bergen, Norway. 6. Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; School of Public Health, Environmental Sciences, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, Norway. Electronic address: John.balmes@ucsf.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: COPD is the third most frequent cause of death globally, with much of this burden attributable to household biomass smoke exposure in developing countries. As biomass smoke exposure is also associated with cardiovascular disease, lower respiratory infection, lung cancer, and cataracts, it presents an important target for public health intervention. METHODS:Lung function in Guatemalan women exposed to wood smoke from open fires was measured throughout the Randomized Exposure Study of Pollution Indoors and Respiratory Effects (RESPIRE) stove intervention trial and continued during the Chronic Respiratory Effects of Early Childhood Exposure to Respirable Particulate Matter (CRECER) cohort study. In RESPIRE, early stove households received a chimney woodstove at the beginning of the 18-month trial, and delayed stove households received a stove at trial completion. Personal exposure to wood smoke was assessed with exhaled breath carbon monoxide (CO) and personal CO tubes. Change in lung function between intervention groups and as a function of wood smoke exposure was assessed using random effects models. RESULTS: Of 306 women participating in both studies, acceptable spirometry was collected in 129 early stove and 136 delayed stove households (n = 265), with a mean follow-up of 5.6 years. Despite reduced wood smoke exposures in early stove households, there were no significant differences in any of the measured spirometric variables during the study period (FEV1, FVC, FEV1/FVC ratio, and annual change) after adjustment for confounding. CONCLUSIONS: In these young Guatemalan women, there was no association between lung function and early randomization to a chimney stove or personal wood smoke exposure. Future stove intervention trials should incorporate cleaner stoves, longer follow-up, or potentially susceptible groups to identify meaningful differences in lung function.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: COPD is the third most frequent cause of death globally, with much of this burden attributable to household biomass smoke exposure in developing countries. As biomass smoke exposure is also associated with cardiovascular disease, lower respiratory infection, lung cancer, and cataracts, it presents an important target for public health intervention. METHODS: Lung function in Guatemalan women exposed to wood smoke from open fires was measured throughout the Randomized Exposure Study of Pollution Indoors and Respiratory Effects (RESPIRE) stove intervention trial and continued during the Chronic Respiratory Effects of Early Childhood Exposure to Respirable Particulate Matter (CRECER) cohort study. In RESPIRE, early stove households received a chimney woodstove at the beginning of the 18-month trial, and delayed stove households received a stove at trial completion. Personal exposure to wood smoke was assessed with exhaled breath carbon monoxide (CO) and personal CO tubes. Change in lung function between intervention groups and as a function of wood smoke exposure was assessed using random effects models. RESULTS: Of 306 women participating in both studies, acceptable spirometry was collected in 129 early stove and 136 delayed stove households (n = 265), with a mean follow-up of 5.6 years. Despite reduced wood smoke exposures in early stove households, there were no significant differences in any of the measured spirometric variables during the study period (FEV1, FVC, FEV1/FVC ratio, and annual change) after adjustment for confounding. CONCLUSIONS: In these young Guatemalan women, there was no association between lung function and early randomization to a chimney stove or personal wood smoke exposure. Future stove intervention trials should incorporate cleaner stoves, longer follow-up, or potentially susceptible groups to identify meaningful differences in lung function.
Authors: Stephen S Lim; Theo Vos; Abraham D Flaxman; Goodarz Danaei; Kenji Shibuya; Heather Adair-Rohani; Markus Amann; H Ross Anderson; Kathryn G Andrews; Martin Aryee; Charles Atkinson; Loraine J Bacchus; Adil N Bahalim; Kalpana Balakrishnan; John Balmes; Suzanne Barker-Collo; Amanda Baxter; Michelle L Bell; Jed D Blore; Fiona Blyth; Carissa Bonner; Guilherme Borges; Rupert Bourne; Michel Boussinesq; Michael Brauer; Peter Brooks; Nigel G Bruce; Bert Brunekreef; Claire Bryan-Hancock; Chiara Bucello; Rachelle Buchbinder; Fiona Bull; Richard T Burnett; Tim E Byers; Bianca Calabria; Jonathan Carapetis; Emily Carnahan; Zoe Chafe; Fiona Charlson; Honglei Chen; Jian Shen Chen; Andrew Tai-Ann Cheng; Jennifer Christine Child; Aaron Cohen; K Ellicott Colson; Benjamin C Cowie; Sarah Darby; Susan Darling; Adrian Davis; Louisa Degenhardt; Frank Dentener; Don C Des Jarlais; Karen Devries; Mukesh Dherani; Eric L Ding; E Ray Dorsey; Tim Driscoll; Karen Edmond; Suad Eltahir Ali; Rebecca E Engell; Patricia J Erwin; Saman Fahimi; Gail Falder; Farshad Farzadfar; Alize Ferrari; Mariel M Finucane; Seth Flaxman; Francis Gerry R Fowkes; Greg Freedman; Michael K Freeman; Emmanuela Gakidou; Santu Ghosh; Edward Giovannucci; Gerhard Gmel; Kathryn Graham; Rebecca Grainger; Bridget Grant; David Gunnell; Hialy R Gutierrez; Wayne Hall; Hans W Hoek; Anthony Hogan; H Dean Hosgood; Damian Hoy; Howard Hu; Bryan J Hubbell; Sally J Hutchings; Sydney E Ibeanusi; Gemma L Jacklyn; Rashmi Jasrasaria; Jost B Jonas; Haidong Kan; John A Kanis; Nicholas Kassebaum; Norito Kawakami; Young-Ho Khang; Shahab Khatibzadeh; Jon-Paul Khoo; Cindy Kok; Francine Laden; Ratilal Lalloo; Qing Lan; Tim Lathlean; Janet L Leasher; James Leigh; Yang Li; John Kent Lin; Steven E Lipshultz; Stephanie London; Rafael Lozano; Yuan Lu; Joelle Mak; Reza Malekzadeh; Leslie Mallinger; Wagner Marcenes; Lyn March; Robin Marks; Randall Martin; Paul McGale; John McGrath; Sumi Mehta; George A Mensah; Tony R Merriman; Renata Micha; Catherine Michaud; Vinod Mishra; Khayriyyah Mohd Hanafiah; Ali A Mokdad; Lidia Morawska; Dariush Mozaffarian; Tasha Murphy; Mohsen Naghavi; Bruce Neal; Paul K Nelson; Joan Miquel Nolla; Rosana Norman; Casey Olives; Saad B Omer; Jessica Orchard; Richard Osborne; Bart Ostro; Andrew Page; Kiran D Pandey; Charles D H Parry; Erin Passmore; Jayadeep Patra; Neil Pearce; Pamela M Pelizzari; Max Petzold; Michael R Phillips; Dan Pope; C Arden Pope; John Powles; Mayuree Rao; Homie Razavi; Eva A Rehfuess; Jürgen T Rehm; Beate Ritz; Frederick P Rivara; Thomas Roberts; Carolyn Robinson; Jose A Rodriguez-Portales; Isabelle Romieu; Robin Room; Lisa C Rosenfeld; Ananya Roy; Lesley Rushton; Joshua A Salomon; Uchechukwu Sampson; Lidia Sanchez-Riera; Ella Sanman; Amir Sapkota; Soraya Seedat; Peilin Shi; Kevin Shield; Rupak Shivakoti; Gitanjali M Singh; David A Sleet; Emma Smith; Kirk R Smith; Nicolas J C Stapelberg; Kyle Steenland; Heidi Stöckl; Lars Jacob Stovner; Kurt Straif; Lahn Straney; George D Thurston; Jimmy H Tran; Rita Van Dingenen; Aaron van Donkelaar; J Lennert Veerman; Lakshmi Vijayakumar; Robert Weintraub; Myrna M Weissman; Richard A White; Harvey Whiteford; Steven T Wiersma; James D Wilkinson; Hywel C Williams; Warwick Williams; Nicholas Wilson; Anthony D Woolf; Paul Yip; Jan M Zielinski; Alan D Lopez; Christopher J L Murray; Majid Ezzati; Mohammad A AlMazroa; Ziad A Memish Journal: Lancet Date: 2012-12-15 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Kirk R Smith; John P McCracken; Martin W Weber; Alan Hubbard; Alisa Jenny; Lisa M Thompson; John Balmes; Anaité Diaz; Byron Arana; Nigel Bruce Journal: Lancet Date: 2011-11-12 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Kalpana Balakrishnan; Santu Ghosh; Bhaswati Ganguli; Sankar Sambandam; Nigel Bruce; Douglas F Barnes; Kirk R Smith Journal: Environ Health Date: 2013-09-11 Impact factor: 5.984
Authors: David Martínez-Briseño; Rosario Fernández-Plata; Laura Gochicoa-Rangel; Luis Torre-Bouscoulet; Rosalba Rojas-Martínez; Laura Mendoza; Cecilia García-Sancho; Rogelio Pérez-Padilla Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-10-15 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Catherine H Miele; Matthew R Grigsby; Trishul Siddharthan; Robert H Gilman; J Jaime Miranda; Antonio Bernabe-Ortiz; Robert A Wise; William Checkley Journal: Thorax Date: 2018-07-30 Impact factor: 9.139
Authors: Leigh M Howard; Roger Fan; Yuwei Zhu; Marie R Griffin; Kathryn M Edwards; Stella Hartinger; John V Williams; Jorge E Vidal; Keith P Klugman; Ana I Gil; Claudio F Lanata; Carlos G Grijalva Journal: Open Forum Infect Dis Date: 2017-08-02 Impact factor: 3.835
Authors: E A Brakema; F A van Gemert; R M J J van der Kleij; S Salvi; M Puhan; N H Chavannes Journal: NPJ Prim Care Respir Med Date: 2019-03-05 Impact factor: 2.871
Authors: André F S Amaral; Jaymini Patel; Bernet S Kato; Daniel O Obaseki; Hervé Lawin; Wan C Tan; Sanjay K Juvekar; Imed Harrabi; Michael Studnicka; Emiel F M Wouters; Li-Cher Loh; Eric D Bateman; Kevin Mortimer; A Sonia Buist; Peter G J Burney Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2017-09-12 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Mulugeta Tamire; Adamu Addissie; Abera Kumie; Emma Husmark; Susann Skovbjerg; Rune Andersson; Mona Lärstad Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-12-19 Impact factor: 3.390