Literature DB >> 20333745

Holmium:YAG (lambda = 2,120 nm) versus thulium fiber (lambda = 1,908 nm) laser lithotripsy.

Richard L Blackmon1, Pierce B Irby, Nathaniel M Fried.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The holmium:YAG laser is currently the most common laser lithotripter. However, recent experimental studies have demonstrated that the thulium fiber laser is also capable of vaporizing urinary stones. The high-temperature water absorption coefficient for the thulium wavelength (mu(a) = 160 cm(-1) at lambda = 1,908 nm) is significantly higher than for the holmium wavelength (mu(a) = 28 cm(-1) at lambda = 2,120 nm). We hypothesize that this should translate into more efficient laser lithotripsy using the thulium fiber laser. This study directly compares stone vaporization rates for holmium and thulium fiber lasers.
METHODS: Holmium laser radiation pulsed at 3 Hz with 70 mJ pulse energy and 220 microseconds pulse duration was delivered through a 100-microm-core silica fiber to human uric acid (UA) and calcium oxalate monohydrate (COM) stones, ex vivo (n = 10 each). Thulium fiber laser radiation pulsed at 10 Hz with 70 mJ pulse energy and 1-millisecond pulse duration was also delivered through a 100-microm fiber for the same sets of 10 stones each.
RESULTS: For the same number of pulses and total energy (126 J) delivered to each stone, the mass loss averaged 2.4+/-0.6 mg (UA) and 0.7+/-0.2 mg (COM) for the holmium laser and 12.6+/-2.5 mg (UA) and 6.8+/-1.7 (COM) for the thulium fiber laser.
CONCLUSIONS: UA and COM stone vaporization rates for the thulium fiber laser averaged 5-10 times higher than for the holmium laser at 70 mJ pulse energies. With further development, the thulium fiber laser may represent an alternative to the conventional holmium laser for more efficient laser lithotripsy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20333745     DOI: 10.1002/lsm.20893

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lasers Surg Med        ISSN: 0196-8092            Impact factor:   4.025


  7 in total

Review 1.  Thulium fiber laser: The new kid on the block.

Authors:  Matthew Schembri; Jayanta Sahu; Omar Aboumarzouk; Amelia Pietropaolo; Bhaskar K Somani
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2020-05-27

2.  Delayed presentation of a detached resectoscope beak and treatment with thulium laser.

Authors:  Niall F Davis; Barry B McGuire; Hugh D Flood
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 3.  Role of lasers in urology.

Authors:  Stephan M Korn; Nicolai A Hübner; Christian Seitz; Shahrokh F Shariat; Harun Fajkovic
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol Sci       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  Basic and advanced technological evolution of laser lithotripsy over the past decade: An educational review by the European Society of Urotechnology Section of the European Association of Urology.

Authors:  Lazaros Tzelves; Bhaskar Somani; Marinos Berdempes; Titos Markopoulos; Andreas Skolarikos
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2021-05

Review 5.  The laser of the future: reality and expectations about the new thulium fiber laser-a systematic review.

Authors:  Peter Kronenberg; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2019-09

Review 6.  Thulium fiber laser: the new player for kidney stone treatment? A comparison with Holmium:YAG laser.

Authors:  Olivier Traxer; Etienne Xavier Keller
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 7.  Thulium fiber laser utilization in urological surgery: A narrative review.

Authors:  Johnathan A Khusid; Raymond Khargi; Benjamin Seiden; Areeba S Sadiq; William M Atallah; Mantu Gupta
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2021-03
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.