Literature DB >> 20332809

Multi-locus inference of population structure: a comparison between single nucleotide polymorphisms and microsatellites.

R J Haasl1, B A Payseur.   

Abstract

Although growing numbers of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and microsatellites (short tandem repeat polymorphisms or STRPs) are used to infer population structure, their relative properties in this context remain poorly understood. SNPs and STRPs mutate differently, suggesting multi-locus genotypes at these loci might differ in ability to detect population structure. Here, we use coalescent simulations to measure the power of sets of SNPs and STRPs to identify population structure. To maximize the applicability of our results to empirical studies, we focus on the popular STRUCTURE analysis and evaluate the role of several biological and practical factors in the detection of population structure. We find that: (1) fewer unlinked STRPs than SNPs are needed to detect structure at recent divergence times <0.3 N(e) generations; (2) accurate estimation of the number of populations requires many fewer STRPs than SNPs; (3) for both marker types, declines in power due to modest gene flow (N(e)m=1.0) are largely negated by increasing marker number; (4) variation in the STRP mutational model affects power modestly; (5) SNP haplotypes (θ=1, no recombination) provide power comparable with STRP loci (θ=10); (6) ascertainment schemes that select highly variable STRP or SNP loci increase power to detect structure, though ascertained data may not be suitable to other inference; and (7) when samples are drawn from an admixed population and one of its parent populations, the reduction in power to detect two populations is greater for STRPs than SNPs. These results should assist the design of multi-locus studies to detect population structure in nature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20332809      PMCID: PMC2892635          DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2010.21

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)        ISSN: 0018-067X            Impact factor:   3.821


  44 in total

1.  Use of unlinked genetic markers to detect population stratification in association studies.

Authors:  J K Pritchard; N A Rosenberg
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Heterogeneous mutation processes in human microsatellite DNA sequences.

Authors:  H Ellegren
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 38.330

3.  The direction of microsatellite mutations is dependent upon allele length.

Authors:  X Xu; M Peng; Z Fang
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 38.330

4.  Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data.

Authors:  J K Pritchard; M Stephens; P Donnelly
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Mutability of microsatellites developed for the ant Camponotus consobrinus.

Authors:  R H Crozier; B Kaufmann; M E Carew; Y C Crozier
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 6.185

6.  Generating samples under a Wright-Fisher neutral model of genetic variation.

Authors:  Richard R Hudson
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  Estimate of the mutation rate per nucleotide in humans.

Authors:  M W Nachman; S L Crowell
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  High mutation rate and mutational bias at (TAA)n microsatellite loci in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.).

Authors:  S M Udupa; M Baum
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.291

9.  Inbreeding Depression and Genetic Rescue in a Plant Metapopulation.

Authors:  Christopher M Richards
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.926

10.  The discovery of single-nucleotide polymorphisms--and inferences about human demographic history.

Authors:  J Wakeley; R Nielsen; S N Liu-Cordero; K Ardlie
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-11-06       Impact factor: 11.025

View more
  62 in total

1.  Phylogeographic analysis of the East Asian goldenrod (Solidago virgaurea complex, Asteraceae) reveals hidden ecological diversification with recurrent formation of ecotypes.

Authors:  Shota Sakaguchi; Takuma Kimura; Ryuta Kyan; Masayuki Maki; Takako Nishino; Naoko Ishikawa; Atsushi J Nagano; Mie N Honjo; Masaki Yasugi; Hiroshi Kudoh; Pan Li; Hyeok Jae Choi; Olga A Chernyagina; Motomi Ito
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  Genetic ancestry inference using support vector machines, and the active emergence of a unique American population.

Authors:  Ryan J Haasl; Catherine A McCarty; Bret A Payseur
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  Microsatellites as targets of natural selection.

Authors:  Ryan J Haasl; Bret A Payseur
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2012-10-27       Impact factor: 16.240

4.  Ecological success of a group of Saccharomyces cerevisiae/Saccharomyces kudriavzevii hybrids in the northern european wine-making environment.

Authors:  C Erny; P Raoult; A Alais; G Butterlin; P Delobel; F Matei-Radoi; S Casaregola; J L Legras
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Demographic history of a recent invasion of house mice on the isolated Island of Gough.

Authors:  Melissa M Gray; Daniel Wegmann; Ryan J Haasl; Michael A White; Sofia I Gabriel; Jeremy B Searle; Richard J Cuthbert; Peter G Ryan; Bret A Payseur
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 6.185

Review 6.  SNP ascertainment bias in population genetic analyses: why it is important, and how to correct it.

Authors:  Joseph Lachance; Sarah A Tishkoff
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 4.345

7.  Transatlantic invasion routes and adaptive potential in North American populations of the invasive glossy buckthorn, Frangula alnus.

Authors:  Hanne De Kort; Joachim Mergeay; Hans Jacquemyn; Olivier Honnay
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 4.357

8.  Molecular hyperdiversity and evolution in very large populations.

Authors:  Asher D Cutter; Richard Jovelin; Alivia Dey
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2013-03-18       Impact factor: 6.185

9.  Assessment of coyote-wolf-dog admixture using ancestry-informative diagnostic SNPs.

Authors:  J Monzón; R Kays; D E Dykhuizen
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 6.185

10.  Pronghorn population genomics show connectivity in the core of their range.

Authors:  Melanie E F LaCava; Roderick B Gagne; Sierra M Love Stowell; Kyle D Gustafson; C Alex Buerkle; Lee Knox; Holly B Ernest
Journal:  J Mammal       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 2.416

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.