Literature DB >> 20332298

The detection of chromosomal aneusomy by fluorescence in situ hybridization in sputum predicts lung cancer incidence.

Marileila Varella-Garcia1, Aline P Schulte, Holly J Wolf, William J Feser, Chan Zeng, Sarah Braudrick, Xiang Yin, Fred R Hirsch, Timothy C Kennedy, Robert L Keith, Anna E Barón, Steven A Belinsky, York E Miller, Tim Byers, Wilbur A Franklin.   

Abstract

Lung cancer usually is disseminated (advanced) and has a poor prognosis at diagnosis. Current and former smokers are at a high risk for lung cancer and are candidates for prevention and early detection strategies. Sputum is a potential source of biomarkers that might determine either lung cancer risk or the presence of early lung cancer, but no current sputum test is sufficiently sensitive and specific for effective screening. We used fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to measure chromosomal aneusomy (CA) in sputum samples collected prospectively from 100 incident lung cancer cases and 96 controls (matched on age, gender, and date of collection) nested within an ongoing high-risk cohort. The CA-FISH assay was aimed at four DNA targets: epidermal growth factor receptor, MYC, 5p15, and CEP 6. The sensitivity of a positive CA-FISH assay (abnormal for two or more of the four markers) for lung cancer was substantially higher for samples collected within 18 months (76% sensitivity) than for samples collected more than 18 months (31%) before lung cancer diagnosis. Sensitivity was higher for squamous cell cancers (94%) than for other histologic types (69%). CA-FISH specificity based on samples collected within 18 months before diagnosis was 88%. The adjusted odds ratio (OR) of lung cancer for specimens collected within 18 months before a cancer diagnosis was higher for the CA-FISH assay [OR, 29.9; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 9.5-94.1] than for previously studied ORs of cytologic atypia (OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.3-2.6) and gene promoter methylation (OR, 6.5; 95% CI, 1.2-35.5). Whether CA-FISH is an indicator of extreme risk for incident lung cancer or detects exfoliated cancer cells is unknown. The apparent promise of CA-FISH in sputum for assessing lung cancer risk and/or for lung cancer early detection now needs to be validated in a clinical screening trial. (c) 2010 AACR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20332298      PMCID: PMC2939746          DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-09-0165

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)        ISSN: 1940-6215


  35 in total

1.  Multi-target interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization assay increases sensitivity of sputum cytology as a predictor of lung cancer.

Authors:  Marileila Varella-Garcia; John Kittelson; Aline P Schulte; Kieu O Vu; Holly J Wolf; Chan Zeng; Fred R Hirsch; Tim Byers; Tim Kennedy; York E Miller; Robert L Keith; Wilbur A Franklin
Journal:  Cancer Detect Prev       Date:  2004

2.  Promoter hypermethylation of multiple genes in sputum precedes lung cancer incidence in a high-risk cohort.

Authors:  Steven A Belinsky; Kieu C Liechty; Frederick D Gentry; Holly J Wolf; Justin Rogers; Kieu Vu; Jerry Haney; Tim C Kennedy; Fred R Hirsch; York Miller; Wilbur A Franklin; James G Herman; Stephen B Baylin; Paul A Bunn; Tim Byers
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2006-03-15       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  Homozygous deletions and chromosome amplifications in human lung carcinomas revealed by single nucleotide polymorphism array analysis.

Authors:  Xiaojun Zhao; Barbara A Weir; Thomas LaFramboise; Ming Lin; Rameen Beroukhim; Levi Garraway; Javad Beheshti; Jeffrey C Lee; Katsuhiko Naoki; William G Richards; David Sugarbaker; Fei Chen; Mark A Rubin; Pasi A Jänne; Luc Girard; John Minna; David Christiani; Cheng Li; William R Sellers; Matthew Meyerson
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2005-07-01       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  High resolution analysis of non-small cell lung cancer cell lines by whole genome tiling path array CGH.

Authors:  Cathie Garnis; William W Lockwood; Emily Vucic; Yong Ge; Luc Girard; John D Minna; Adi F Gazdar; Stephen Lam; Calum MacAulay; Wan L Lam
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2006-03-15       Impact factor: 7.396

5.  Predicting lung cancer by detecting aberrant promoter methylation in sputum.

Authors:  W A Palmisano; K K Divine; G Saccomanno; F D Gilliland; S B Baylin; J G Herman; S A Belinsky
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2000-11-01       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  High prevalence of occult endobronchial malignancy in high risk patients with moderate sputum atypia.

Authors:  Timothy C Kennedy; Wilbur A Franklin; Sheila A Prindiville; Robert Cook; Edward C Dempsey; Robert L Keith; Fred R Hirsch; Thomas A Merrick; Kenneth R Shroyer; Thomas L Petty; Tim Byers; Paul A Bunn; York E Miller
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2005-04-14       Impact factor: 5.705

7.  High-resolution genomic profiles of human lung cancer.

Authors:  Giovanni Tonon; Kwok-Kin Wong; Gautam Maulik; Cameron Brennan; Bin Feng; Yunyu Zhang; Deepak B Khatry; Alexei Protopopov; Mingjian James You; Andrew J Aguirre; Eric S Martin; Zhaohui Yang; Hongbin Ji; Lynda Chin; Ronald A Depinho
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-06-27       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Altered miRNA expression in sputum for diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Ying Xie; Nevins W Todd; Zhenqiu Liu; Min Zhan; Hongbin Fang; Hong Peng; Mohammed Alattar; Janaki Deepak; Sanford A Stass; Feng Jiang
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 5.705

9.  Cytopathological analysis of sputum in patients with airflow obstruction and significant smoking histories.

Authors:  T C Kennedy; S P Proudfoot; W A Franklin; T A Merrick; G Saccomanno; M E Corkill; D L Mumma; K E Sirgi; Y E Miller; P G Archer; A Prochazka
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1996-10-15       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  Sputum cytological atypia as a predictor of incident lung cancer in a cohort of heavy smokers with airflow obstruction.

Authors:  Sheila A Prindiville; Tim Byers; Fred R Hirsch; Wilbur A Franklin; York E Miller; Kieu O Vu; Holly J Wolf; Anna E Barón; Kenneth R Shroyer; Chan Zeng; Tim C Kennedy; Paul A Bunn
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.254

View more
  18 in total

1.  Progressive endobronchial premalignancy: marked by original CIN.

Authors:  Christopher D Coldren; York E Miller
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2011-10-15       Impact factor: 21.405

2.  De novo generation of white adipocytes from the myeloid lineage via mesenchymal intermediates is age, adipose depot, and gender specific.

Authors:  Susan M Majka; Keith E Fox; John C Psilas; Karen M Helm; Christine R Childs; Alistaire S Acosta; Rachel C Janssen; Jacob E Friedman; Brian T Woessner; Theodore R Shade; Marileila Varella-Garcia; Dwight J Klemm
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-08-02       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Clinical Utility of Chromosomal Aneusomy in Individuals at High Risk of Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Anna E Barón; Severine Kako; William J Feser; Heather Malinowski; Daniel Merrick; Kavita Garg; Stephen Malkoski; Shannon Pretzel; Jill M Siegfried; Wilbur A Franklin; York Miller; Holly J Wolf; Marileila Varella-Garcia
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 15.609

Review 4.  Interphase cytogenetics of sputum cells for the early detection of lung carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Sheila A Prindiville; Thomas Ried
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2010-03-23

Review 5.  Update on biomarkers for the detection of lung cancer.

Authors:  Eloisa Jantus-Lewintre; Marta Usó; Elena Sanmartín; Carlos Camps
Journal:  Lung Cancer (Auckl)       Date:  2012-06-11

Review 6.  Convergence of nanotechnology and cancer prevention: are we there yet?

Authors:  David G Menter; Sherri L Patterson; Craig D Logsdon; Scott Kopetz; Anil K Sood; Ernest T Hawk
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2014-07-24

7.  Identification of ENO1 as a potential sputum biomarker for early-stage lung cancer by shotgun proteomics.

Authors:  Lei Yu; Jun Shen; Kaiissar Mannoor; Maria Guarnera; Feng Jiang
Journal:  Clin Lung Cancer       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 4.785

Review 8.  Biomarkers of risk to develop lung cancer in the new screening era.

Authors:  Thomas Atwater; Pierre P Massion
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-04

Review 9.  Molecular biology of lung cancer: Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  Serge Patrick Nana-Sinkam; Charles A Powell
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 10.  Chemoprevention of lung cancer: Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  Eva Szabo; Jenny T Mao; Stephen Lam; Mary E Reid; Robert L Keith
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 9.410

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.