Literature DB >> 25060262

Convergence of nanotechnology and cancer prevention: are we there yet?

David G Menter1, Sherri L Patterson2, Craig D Logsdon3, Scott Kopetz4, Anil K Sood5, Ernest T Hawk6.   

Abstract

Nanotechnology is emerging as a promising modality for cancer treatment; however, in the realm of cancer prevention, its full utility has yet to be determined. Here, we discuss the potential of integrating nanotechnology in cancer prevention to augment early diagnosis, precision targeting, and controlled release of chemopreventive agents, reduced toxicity, risk/response assessment, and personalized point-of-care monitoring. Cancer is a multistep, progressive disease; the functional and acquired characteristics of the early precancer phenotype are intrinsically different from those of a more advanced anaplastic or invasive malignancy. Therefore, applying nanotechnology to precancers is likely to be far more challenging than applying it to established disease. Frank cancers are more readily identifiable through imaging and biomarker and histopathologic assessment than their precancerous precursors. In addition, prevention subjects routinely have more rigorous intervention criteria than therapy subjects. Any nanopreventive agent developed to prevent sporadic cancers found in the general population must exhibit a very low risk of serious side effects. In contrast, a greater risk of side effects might be more acceptable in subjects at high risk for cancer. Using nanotechnology to prevent cancer is an aspirational goal, but clearly identifying the intermediate objectives and potential barriers is an essential first step in this exciting journey. ©2014 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25060262      PMCID: PMC4307396          DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-14-0079

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)        ISSN: 1940-6215


  250 in total

1.  Multifunctional mesoporous silica nanoparticles for intracellular labeling and animal magnetic resonance imaging studies.

Authors:  Si-Han Wu; Yu-Shen Lin; Yann Hung; Yi-Hsin Chou; Yi-Hua Hsu; Chen Chang; Chung-Yuan Mou
Journal:  Chembiochem       Date:  2008-01-04       Impact factor: 3.164

Review 2.  "Sprouting angiogenesis", a reappraisal.

Authors:  Domenico Ribatti; Enrico Crivellato
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2012-09-29       Impact factor: 3.582

Review 3.  Nanocarrier systems for oral drug delivery: do we really need them?

Authors:  Andreas Bernkop-Schnürch
Journal:  Eur J Pharm Sci       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 4.384

4.  The potential of celecoxib-loaded hydroxyapatite-chitosan nanocomposite for the treatment of colon cancer.

Authors:  P Venkatesan; Nagaprasad Puvvada; Rupesh Dash; B N Prashanth Kumar; Devanand Sarkar; Belal Azab; Amita Pathak; Subhas C Kundu; Paul B Fisher; Mahitosh Mandal
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 5.  Biomarkers for risk assessment and prevention of breast cancer.

Authors:  Massimiliano Cazzaniga; Andrea Decensi; Bernardo Bonanni; Alberto Luini; Oreste Gentilini
Journal:  Curr Cancer Drug Targets       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.428

6.  Clinical trial: comparison of ibuprofen-phosphatidylcholine and ibuprofen on the gastrointestinal safety and analgesic efficacy in osteoarthritic patients.

Authors:  F L Lanza; U K Marathi; B S Anand; L M Lichtenberger
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2008-06-11       Impact factor: 8.171

7.  Safety and efficacy of RNAi therapy for transthyretin amyloidosis.

Authors:  Teresa Coelho; David Adams; Ana Silva; Pierre Lozeron; Philip N Hawkins; Timothy Mant; Javier Perez; Joseph Chiesa; Steve Warrington; Elizabeth Tranter; Malathy Munisamy; Rick Falzone; Jamie Harrop; Jeffrey Cehelsky; Brian R Bettencourt; Mary Geissler; James S Butler; Alfica Sehgal; Rachel E Meyers; Qingmin Chen; Todd Borland; Renta M Hutabarat; Valerie A Clausen; Rene Alvarez; Kevin Fitzgerald; Christina Gamba-Vitalo; Saraswathy V Nochur; Akshay K Vaishnaw; Dinah W Y Sah; Jared A Gollob; Ole B Suhr
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 8.  Survivorship: adult cancer survivors.

Authors:  Patricia A Ganz
Journal:  Prim Care       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.907

9.  Iron requirements based upon iron absorption tests are poorly predicted by haematological indices in patients with inactive inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  Miranda C E Lomer; William B Cook; Hamid Jan B Jan-Mohamed; Carol Hutchinson; Ding Yong Liu; Robert C Hider; Jonathan J Powell
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 3.718

10.  In vitro and in vivo imaging of prostate cancer angiogenesis using anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 antibody-conjugated quantum dot.

Authors:  Haejin Kwon; Jiyeon Lee; Rita Song; Sung Il Hwang; Junghan Lee; Young-Hwa Kim; Hak Jong Lee
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 3.500

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Nano-selenium and its nanomedicine applications: a critical review.

Authors:  Bozena Hosnedlova; Marta Kepinska; Sylvie Skalickova; Carlos Fernandez; Branislav Ruttkay-Nedecky; Qiuming Peng; Mojmir Baron; Magdalena Melcova; Radka Opatrilova; Jarmila Zidkova; Geir Bjørklund; Jiri Sochor; Rene Kizek
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2018-04-10

Review 2.  Potential Applications of Nanotechnology in Urological Cancer.

Authors:  Ming-Hui He; Li Chen; Ting Zheng; Yu Tu; Qian He; Hua-Lin Fu; Ju-Chun Lin; Wei Zhang; Gang Shu; Lili He; Zhi-Xiang Yuan
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 5.810

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.