Eva Szabo1, Jenny T Mao2, Stephen Lam3, Mary E Reid4, Robert L Keith5. 1. Lung and Upper Aerodigestive Cancer Research Group, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD. 2. Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, New Mexico VA Health Care System/University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM. 3. British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada. 4. Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY. 5. VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, CO. Electronic address: Robert.keith@ucdenver.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer death in men and women in the United States. Cigarette smoking is the main risk factor. Former smokers are at a substantially increased risk of developing lung cancer compared with lifetime never smokers. Chemoprevention refers to the use of specific agents to reverse, suppress, or prevent the process of carcinogenesis. This article reviews the major agents that have been studied for chemoprevention. METHODS: Articles of primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention trials were reviewed and summarized to obtain recommendations. RESULTS: None of the phase 3 trials with the agents β-carotene, retinol, 13-cis-retinoic acid, α-tocopherol, N-acetylcysteine, acetylsalicylic acid, or selenium has demonstrated beneficial and reproducible results. To facilitate the evaluation of promising agents and to lessen the need for a large sample size, extensive time commitment, and expense, surrogate end point biomarker trials are being conducted to assist in identifying the most promising agents for later-stage chemoprevention trials. With the understanding of important cellular signaling pathways and the expansion of potentially important targets, agents (many of which target inflammation and the arachidonic acid pathway) are being developed and tested which may prevent or reverse lung carcinogenesis. CONCLUSIONS: By integrating biologic knowledge, additional early-phase trials can be performed in a reasonable time frame. The future of lung cancer chemoprevention should entail the evaluation of single agents or combinations that target various pathways while working toward identification and validation of intermediate end points.
BACKGROUND:Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer death in men and women in the United States. Cigarette smoking is the main risk factor. Former smokers are at a substantially increased risk of developing lung cancer compared with lifetime never smokers. Chemoprevention refers to the use of specific agents to reverse, suppress, or prevent the process of carcinogenesis. This article reviews the major agents that have been studied for chemoprevention. METHODS: Articles of primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention trials were reviewed and summarized to obtain recommendations. RESULTS: None of the phase 3 trials with the agents β-carotene, retinol, 13-cis-retinoic acid, α-tocopherol, N-acetylcysteine, acetylsalicylic acid, or selenium has demonstrated beneficial and reproducible results. To facilitate the evaluation of promising agents and to lessen the need for a large sample size, extensive time commitment, and expense, surrogate end point biomarker trials are being conducted to assist in identifying the most promising agents for later-stage chemoprevention trials. With the understanding of important cellular signaling pathways and the expansion of potentially important targets, agents (many of which target inflammation and the arachidonic acid pathway) are being developed and tested which may prevent or reverse lung carcinogenesis. CONCLUSIONS: By integrating biologic knowledge, additional early-phase trials can be performed in a reasonable time frame. The future of lung cancer chemoprevention should entail the evaluation of single agents or combinations that target various pathways while working toward identification and validation of intermediate end points.
Authors: Farin Kamangar; You-Lin Qiao; Binbing Yu; Xiu-Di Sun; Christian C Abnet; Jin-Hu Fan; Steven D Mark; Ping Zhao; Sanford M Dawsey; Philip R Taylor Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: John A Baron; Robert S Sandler; Robert S Bresalier; Angel Lanas; Dion G Morton; Robert Riddell; Erik R Iverson; David L Demets Journal: Lancet Date: 2008-10-14 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Christopher G Slatore; Nanda Horeweg; James R Jett; David E Midthun; Charles A Powell; Renda Soylemez Wiener; Juan P Wisnivesky; Michael K Gould Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2015-08-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Gerard J Criner; Jean Bourbeau; Rebecca L Diekemper; Daniel R Ouellette; Donna Goodridge; Paul Hernandez; Kristen Curren; Meyer S Balter; Mohit Bhutani; Pat G Camp; Bartolome R Celli; Gail Dechman; Mark T Dransfield; Stanley B Fiel; Marilyn G Foreman; Nicola A Hanania; Belinda K Ireland; Nathaniel Marchetti; Darcy D Marciniuk; Richard A Mularski; Joseph Ornelas; Jeremy D Road; Michael K Stickland Journal: Chest Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Karen Colbert Maresso; Kenneth Y Tsai; Powel H Brown; Eva Szabo; Scott Lippman; Ernest T Hawk Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2015-08-18 Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Stephen Lam; Sumithra J Mandrekar; Yaron Gesthalter; Katie L Allen Ziegler; Drew K Seisler; David E Midthun; Jenny T Mao; Marie Christine Aubry; Annette McWilliams; Don D Sin; Tawimas Shaipanich; Gang Liu; Evan Johnson; Andrea Bild; Marc E Lenburg; Diana N Ionescu; John Mayo; Joanne Eunhee Yi; Henry Tazelaar; William S Harmsen; Judith Smith; Avrum E Spira; Jennifer Beane; Paul J Limburg; Eva Szabo Journal: Cancer Prev Res (Phila) Date: 2016-09-22
Authors: Elvira L Liclican; Tonya C Walser; Saswati Hazra; Kostyantyn Krysan; Stacy J Park; Paul C Pagano; Brian K Gardner; Jill E Larsen; John D Minna; Steven M Dubinett Journal: Cancer Prev Res (Phila) Date: 2014-06-09