BACKGROUND: Despite the widespread use of immunohistochemistry (IHC), there are no standardization guidelines that control for antibody probe variability. Here we describe the effect of variable antibody reagents in the assessment of cancer-related biomarkers by IHC. METHODS: Estrogen receptor (ER), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) 1, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 3 (HER3) were evaluated by quantitative immunofluorescence. Correlations between ER clones 1D5, SP1, F10, and ER60c, and EGFR monoclonal 31G7, 2-18C9, H11, and 15F8, and polyclonal 2232 antibodies were assessed in 642 breast cancer patients. HER3 was measured by RTJ1, RTJ2, SGP1, M7297, RB-9211, and C-17 antibodies in 42 lung cancer patients. Survival analysis was done with the use of multiple cutoff points to reveal any prognostic classification. RESULTS: All ER antibodies were tightly correlated (Pearson's r(2) = 0.94-0.96; P < 0.0001) and western blotting confirmed their specificity in MCF-7 and BT474 cells. All EGFR antibodies but 2232 yielded specific results in western blotting; however, only 31G7 and 2-18C9 were strongly associated (Pearson's r(2) = 0.61; P < 0.0001). HER3 staining was nonspecific and nonreproducible. High EGFR-expressing patients had a worse prognosis when EGFR was measured with H11 or 31G7 (log rank P = 0.015 and P = 0.06). There was no statistically significant correlation between survival and EGFR detected by 2-18C9, 15F8, or polyclonal 2232 antibodies. CONCLUSIONS: Antibody validation is a critical analytic factor that regulates IHC readings in biomarker studies. Evaluation of IHC proficiency and quality control are key components toward IHC standardization. IMPACT: This work highlights the importance of IHC standardization and could result in the improvement of clinically relevant IHC protocols.
BACKGROUND: Despite the widespread use of immunohistochemistry (IHC), there are no standardization guidelines that control for antibody probe variability. Here we describe the effect of variable antibody reagents in the assessment of cancer-related biomarkers by IHC. METHODS:Estrogen receptor (ER), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) 1, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 3 (HER3) were evaluated by quantitative immunofluorescence. Correlations between ER clones 1D5, SP1, F10, and ER60c, and EGFR monoclonal 31G7, 2-18C9, H11, and 15F8, and polyclonal 2232 antibodies were assessed in 642 breast cancerpatients. HER3 was measured by RTJ1, RTJ2, SGP1, M7297, RB-9211, and C-17 antibodies in 42 lung cancerpatients. Survival analysis was done with the use of multiple cutoff points to reveal any prognostic classification. RESULTS: All ER antibodies were tightly correlated (Pearson's r(2) = 0.94-0.96; P < 0.0001) and western blotting confirmed their specificity in MCF-7 and BT474 cells. All EGFR antibodies but 2232 yielded specific results in western blotting; however, only 31G7 and 2-18C9 were strongly associated (Pearson's r(2) = 0.61; P < 0.0001). HER3 staining was nonspecific and nonreproducible. High EGFR-expressing patients had a worse prognosis when EGFR was measured with H11 or 31G7 (log rank P = 0.015 and P = 0.06). There was no statistically significant correlation between survival and EGFR detected by 2-18C9, 15F8, or polyclonal 2232 antibodies. CONCLUSIONS: Antibody validation is a critical analytic factor that regulates IHC readings in biomarker studies. Evaluation of IHC proficiency and quality control are key components toward IHC standardization. IMPACT: This work highlights the importance of IHC standardization and could result in the improvement of clinically relevant IHC protocols.
Authors: A P Meert; B Martin; P Delmotte; T Berghmans; J J Lafitte; C Mascaux; M Paesmans; E Steels; J M Verdebout; J P Sculier Journal: Eur Respir J Date: 2002-10 Impact factor: 16.671
Authors: S A Pileri; G Roncador; C Ceccarelli; M Piccioli; A Briskomatis; E Sabattini; S Ascani; D Santini; P P Piccaluga; O Leone; S Damiani; C Ercolessi; F Sandri; F Pieri; L Leoncini; B Falini Journal: J Pathol Date: 1997-09 Impact factor: 7.996
Authors: Allison W Welsh; Donald R Lannin; Gregory S Young; Mark E Sherman; Jonine D Figueroa; N Lynn Henry; Lisa Ryden; Chungyeul Kim; Richard R Love; Rachel Schiff; David L Rimm Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2011-10-06 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Stephanie A Kazane; Devin Sok; Edward H Cho; Maria Loressa Uson; Peter Kuhn; Peter G Schultz; Vaughn V Smider Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2012-02-15 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Michael Angelo; Sean C Bendall; Rachel Finck; Matthew B Hale; Chuck Hitzman; Alexander D Borowsky; Richard M Levenson; John B Lowe; Scot D Liu; Shuchun Zhao; Yasodha Natkunam; Garry P Nolan Journal: Nat Med Date: 2014-03-02 Impact factor: 53.440