PURPOSE: In addition to genomic signaling, it is accepted that estrogen receptor-α (ERα) has nonnuclear signaling functions, which correlate with tamoxifen resistance in preclinical models. However, evidence for cytoplasmic ER localization in human breast tumors is less established. We sought to determine the presence and implications of nonnuclear ER in clinical specimens. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: A panel of ERα-specific antibodies (SP1, MC20, F10, 60c, and 1D5) was validated by Western blot and quantitative immunofluorescent (QIF) analysis of cell lines and patient controls. Then eight retrospective cohorts collected on tissue microarrays were assessed for cytoplasmic ER. Four cohorts were from Yale (YTMA 49, 107, 130, and 128) and four others (NCI YTMA 99, South Swedish Breast Cancer Group SBII, NSABP B14, and a Vietnamese Cohort) from other sites around the world. RESULTS: Four of the antibodies specifically recognized ER by Western and QIF analysis, showed linear increases in amounts of ER in cell line series with progressively increasing ER, and the antibodies were reproducible on YTMA 49 with Pearson correlations (r(2) values) ranging from 0.87 to 0.94. One antibody with striking cytoplasmic staining (MC20) failed validation. We found evidence for specific cytoplasmic staining with the other four antibodies across eight cohorts. The average incidence was 1.5%, ranging from 0 to 3.2%. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show ERα is present in the cytoplasm in a number of cases using multiple antibodies while reinforcing the importance of antibody validation. In nearly 3,200 cases, cytoplasmic ER is present at very low incidence, suggesting its measurement is unlikely to be of routine clinical value.
PURPOSE: In addition to genomic signaling, it is accepted that estrogen receptor-α (ERα) has nonnuclear signaling functions, which correlate with tamoxifen resistance in preclinical models. However, evidence for cytoplasmic ER localization in humanbreast tumors is less established. We sought to determine the presence and implications of nonnuclear ER in clinical specimens. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: A panel of ERα-specific antibodies (SP1, MC20, F10, 60c, and 1D5) was validated by Western blot and quantitative immunofluorescent (QIF) analysis of cell lines and patient controls. Then eight retrospective cohorts collected on tissue microarrays were assessed for cytoplasmic ER. Four cohorts were from Yale (YTMA 49, 107, 130, and 128) and four others (NCI YTMA 99, South Swedish Breast Cancer Group SBII, NSABP B14, and a Vietnamese Cohort) from other sites around the world. RESULTS: Four of the antibodies specifically recognized ER by Western and QIF analysis, showed linear increases in amounts of ER in cell line series with progressively increasing ER, and the antibodies were reproducible on YTMA 49 with Pearson correlations (r(2) values) ranging from 0.87 to 0.94. One antibody with striking cytoplasmic staining (MC20) failed validation. We found evidence for specific cytoplasmic staining with the other four antibodies across eight cohorts. The average incidence was 1.5%, ranging from 0 to 3.2%. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show ERα is present in the cytoplasm in a number of cases using multiple antibodies while reinforcing the importance of antibody validation. In nearly 3,200 cases, cytoplasmic ER is present at very low incidence, suggesting its measurement is unlikely to be of routine clinical value.
Authors: Maggie C U Cheang; Diana O Treaba; Caroline H Speers; Ivo A Olivotto; Chris D Bajdik; Stephen K Chia; Lynn C Goldstein; Karen A Gelmon; David Huntsman; C Blake Gilks; Torsten O Nielsen; Allen M Gown Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-11-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: James G Greger; Natalie Fursov; Neil Cooch; Sean McLarney; Leonard P Freedman; Dean P Edwards; Boris J Cheskis Journal: Mol Cell Biol Date: 2006-12-28 Impact factor: 4.272
Authors: Ali Pedram; Mahnaz Razandi; Richard C A Sainson; Jin K Kim; Christopher C Hughes; Ellis R Levin Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2007-05-29 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Christopher B Moeder; Jennifer M Giltnane; Malini Harigopal; Annette Molinaro; Andrew Robinson; Karen Gelmon; David Huntsman; Robert L Camp; David L Rimm Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-12-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jennifer M Giltnane; Lisa Rydén; Melissa Cregger; Pär-Ola Bendahl; Karin Jirström; David L Rimm Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-07-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Nehad M Ayoub; Abu Bakar Siddique; Hassan Y Ebrahim; Mohamed M Mohyeldin; Khalid A El Sayed Journal: Eur J Pharmacol Date: 2017-06-15 Impact factor: 4.432
Authors: Jason S Carroll; Theresa E Hickey; Gerard A Tarulli; Michael Williams; Wayne D Tilley Journal: Nat Rev Cancer Date: 2016-11-25 Impact factor: 60.716
Authors: Erin K Shanle; Adedayo A Onitilo; Wei Huang; KyungMann Kim; Chong Zang; Jessica M Engel; Wei Xu; Kari B Wisinski Journal: Am J Transl Res Date: 2015-07-15 Impact factor: 4.060