Importance: Clinical outcome in multiple sclerosis was suggested to be driven by not only remyelination but also adaptive reorganization. This mechanism needs to be further understood. Objective: To explore anatomical and functional visual networks in patients with optic neuritis (ON) to assess the relative weight of each connectivity modality to expedite visual recovery. Design, Setting, and Participants: Between March 11, 2011, and May 26, 2014, 39 patients with either clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) ON (n = 18) or other CIS (non-ON) (n = 21) were recruited 1 to 28 months following an initial clinical event. These patients enrolled in an ongoing prospective cohort study (107 participants at the time of this present study) about the disease course of CIS and multiple sclerosis. Inclusion criteria were an age of 18 to 65 years, the suggestive clinical and paraclinical diagnosis of CIS or multiple sclerosis after relevant differential diagnoses have been ruled out, the existence of complete imaging data, and no ocular comorbidities. Anatomical connectivity was evaluated by diffusion tensor imaging, and functional connectivity was evaluated by resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging. The visual pathways, including optic tracts, optic radiations, and splenial fibers, were delineated, and the resting-state visual networks were detected. Data analysis took place from September 1, 2015, to December 1, 2015. Main Outcomes and Measures: Connectivity changes were quantified and compared to determine the association of ON with the visual network. Results: This study included 18 patients with CIS ON, 11 (61%) of whom were women with a mean (SD) age of 32.83 (8.53) years, and 21 patients with CIS non-ON (11 [52%] of whom were women with a mean [SD] age of 30.86 [7.54] years). With the use of diffusion tensor imaging, reduced diffusivity (mean [SD] fractional anisotropy, 0.35 [0.03] vs 0.38 [0.03]; P < .01) was evident along the optic tracts of patients with ON, suggesting the extension of axonal injury from the damaged optic nerve. Neither the optic radiations nor the splenial fibers showed evidence of loss of integrity. Yet, in the presence of an intact postgeniculate anatomical network, the functional connectivity within the visual network was higher in the ON cohort. Functional connectivity observed in cortical motion-related areas was inversely correlated with the visual evoked potential-measured conduction velocity (r = -0.59; P < .05). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort, local optic nerve demyelinating damage does not affect distant wiring, but even in the presence of an intact anatomical network, functional modification may occur. These functional network changes may be part of the recovery process, but further research is needed to elucidate this process.
Importance: Clinical outcome in multiple sclerosis was suggested to be driven by not only remyelination but also adaptive reorganization. This mechanism needs to be further understood. Objective: To explore anatomical and functional visual networks in patients with optic neuritis (ON) to assess the relative weight of each connectivity modality to expedite visual recovery. Design, Setting, and Participants: Between March 11, 2011, and May 26, 2014, 39 patients with either clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) ON (n = 18) or other CIS (non-ON) (n = 21) were recruited 1 to 28 months following an initial clinical event. These patients enrolled in an ongoing prospective cohort study (107 participants at the time of this present study) about the disease course of CIS and multiple sclerosis. Inclusion criteria were an age of 18 to 65 years, the suggestive clinical and paraclinical diagnosis of CIS or multiple sclerosis after relevant differential diagnoses have been ruled out, the existence of complete imaging data, and no ocular comorbidities. Anatomical connectivity was evaluated by diffusion tensor imaging, and functional connectivity was evaluated by resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging. The visual pathways, including optic tracts, optic radiations, and splenial fibers, were delineated, and the resting-state visual networks were detected. Data analysis took place from September 1, 2015, to December 1, 2015. Main Outcomes and Measures: Connectivity changes were quantified and compared to determine the association of ON with the visual network. Results: This study included 18 patients with CIS ON, 11 (61%) of whom were women with a mean (SD) age of 32.83 (8.53) years, and 21 patients with CIS non-ON (11 [52%] of whom were women with a mean [SD] age of 30.86 [7.54] years). With the use of diffusion tensor imaging, reduced diffusivity (mean [SD] fractional anisotropy, 0.35 [0.03] vs 0.38 [0.03]; P < .01) was evident along the optic tracts of patients with ON, suggesting the extension of axonal injury from the damaged optic nerve. Neither the optic radiations nor the splenial fibers showed evidence of loss of integrity. Yet, in the presence of an intact postgeniculate anatomical network, the functional connectivity within the visual network was higher in the ON cohort. Functional connectivity observed in cortical motion-related areas was inversely correlated with the visual evoked potential-measured conduction velocity (r = -0.59; P < .05). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort, local optic nerve demyelinating damage does not affect distant wiring, but even in the presence of an intact anatomical network, functional modification may occur. These functional network changes may be part of the recovery process, but further research is needed to elucidate this process.
Authors: Iñigo Gabilondo; Elena H Martínez-Lapiscina; Eloy Martínez-Heras; Elena Fraga-Pumar; Sara Llufriu; Santiago Ortiz; Santiago Bullich; Maria Sepulveda; Carles Falcon; Joan Berenguer; Albert Saiz; Bernardo Sanchez-Dalmau; Pablo Villoslada Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2014-01-02 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Michael B Hoffmann; Falko R Kaule; Netta Levin; Yoichiro Masuda; Anil Kumar; Irene Gottlob; Hiroshi Horiguchi; Robert F Dougherty; Joerg Stadler; Barbara Wolynski; Oliver Speck; Martin Kanowski; Yaping J Liao; Brian A Wandell; Serge O Dumoulin Journal: Neuron Date: 2012-08-09 Impact factor: 17.173
Authors: Anthony J Sherbondy; Robert F Dougherty; Michal Ben-Shachar; Sandy Napel; Brian A Wandell Journal: J Vis Date: 2008-07-29 Impact factor: 2.240
Authors: Caspar F Pfueller; Alexander U Brandt; Florian Schubert; Markus Bock; Bernadeta Walaszek; Helmar Waiczies; Thomas Schwenteck; Jan Dörr; Judith Bellmann-Strobl; Christian Mohr; Nicholetta Weinges-Evers; Bernd Ittermann; Jens T Wuerfel; Friedemann Paul Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-04-06 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Declan T Chard; Adnan A S Alahmadi; Bertrand Audoin; Thalis Charalambous; Christian Enzinger; Hanneke E Hulst; Maria A Rocca; Àlex Rovira; Jaume Sastre-Garriga; Menno M Schoonheim; Betty Tijms; Carmen Tur; Claudia A M Gandini Wheeler-Kingshott; Alle Meije Wink; Olga Ciccarelli; Frederik Barkhof Journal: Nat Rev Neurol Date: 2021-01-12 Impact factor: 42.937
Authors: Arzu C Has Silemek; Jean-Philippe Ranjeva; Bertrand Audoin; Christoph Heesen; Stefan M Gold; Simone Kühn; Martin Weygandt; Jan-Patrick Stellmann Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2021-04-07 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Noah Ayadi; Jan Dörr; Seyedamirhosein Motamedi; Kay Gawlik; Judith Bellmann-Strobl; Janine Mikolajczak; Alexander U Brandt; Hanna Zimmermann; Friedemann Paul Journal: Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm Date: 2018-08-14