Literature DB >> 20331359

Genic capture, sex linkage, and the heritability of fitness.

Tim Connallon1.   

Abstract

Several sexual selection models predict that females will obtain indirect genetic benefits by preferentially mating with males that transmit high-quality genes to their offspring. However, despite widespread observations of additive population genetic variation for fitness as well as for male sexually selected traits, estimated fitness associations between fathers and offspring are often weak. Perhaps more puzzling, the strength of these associations differs drastically between species, leading many researchers to question the relevance of genetic benefits for processes of sexual selection. Here, I show that a species' sex chromosome system can strongly influence the genetic architecture of male and female fitness variation and, consequently, the heritability of fitness between fathers and their offspring. Indirect genetic benefits are reduced, and sexually antagonistic costs are pronounced, in species with X chromosomes relative to species with homomorphic sex chromosomes, environmental sex determination, or Z chromosomes. Data from the sexual selection literature are consistent with predictions of the models, though additional studies will be required to circumvent phylogenetic nonindependence between sex determination systems. This study strongly suggests that inferences about genetic benefits of female choice must be considered within a species-specific genomic context, and it has several implications for the evolution of female preferences as well as the genomic consequences of sex and sexual selection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20331359     DOI: 10.1086/651590

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  13 in total

1.  Sex linkage, sex-specific selection, and the role of recombination in the evolution of sexually dimorphic gene expression.

Authors:  Tim Connallon; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  The resolution of sexual antagonism by gene duplication.

Authors:  Tim Connallon; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-01-10       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Local adaptation and the evolution of inversions on sex chromosomes and autosomes.

Authors:  Tim Connallon; Colin Olito; Ludovic Dutoit; Homa Papoli; Filip Ruzicka; Lengxob Yong
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  A general population genetic framework for antagonistic selection that accounts for demography and recurrent mutation.

Authors:  Tim Connallon; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Condition dependence and the nature of genetic variation for male sex comb bristle number in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Abha Ahuja; Scott De Vito; Rama S Singh
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 1.082

6.  Sex differences in deleterious mutational effects in Drosophila melanogaster: combining quantitative and population genetic insights.

Authors:  Filip Ruzicka; Tim Connallon; Max Reuter
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2021-11-05       Impact factor: 4.402

7.  Is the X chromosome a hot spot for sexually antagonistic polymorphisms? Biases in current empirical tests of classical theory.

Authors:  Filip Ruzicka; Tim Connallon
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Meta-analytic evidence that sexual selection improves population fitness.

Authors:  Justin G Cally; Devi Stuart-Fox; Luke Holman
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Genome-wide sexually antagonistic variants reveal long-standing constraints on sexual dimorphism in fruit flies.

Authors:  Filip Ruzicka; Mark S Hill; Tanya M Pennell; Ilona Flis; Fiona C Ingleby; Richard Mott; Kevin Fowler; Edward H Morrow; Max Reuter
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  Implications of sex-specific selection for the genetic basis of disease.

Authors:  Edward H Morrow; Tim Connallon
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 5.183

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.