Literature DB >> 2032826

Resident interpretation of emergency computed tomographic scans.

M H Roszler1, K A McCarroll, T Rashid, K R Donovan, G A Kling.   

Abstract

Our busy, urban emergency room is staffed by radiology residents after working hours. To determine the accuracy of our residents' interpretations of emergency cranial computed tomographic (CT) scans, the authors reviewed the preliminary reports of our residents for a two-month period. A total of 289 cranial CT scans were retrospectively reviewed and the resident interpretation judged acceptable, minor error, moderate error, or major error. Six of 289 neurologic examinations (2%) had moderate (4) or major (2) errors. The mistakes all involved misinterpretation of cerebral hemorrhage. The 98% accuracy in interpretation of cranial CT is higher than the accuracy reported with emergency plain film (PF) interpretation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2032826     DOI: 10.1097/00004424-199104000-00016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Radiol        ISSN: 0020-9996            Impact factor:   6.016


  12 in total

1.  Clinical consequences of misinterpretations of neuroradiologic CT scans by on-call radiology residents.

Authors:  N R Lal; U M Murray; O P Eldevik; J S Desmond
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Diagnostic errors by radiology residents in interpreting pediatric radiographs in an emergency setting.

Authors:  Mark J Halsted; Hari Kumar; Jason J Paquin; Stacy A Poe; Judy A Bean; John M Racadio; Janet L Strife; Lane F Donnelly
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2004-02-11

3.  Spectrum of diagnostic errors in radiology.

Authors:  Antonio Pinto; Luca Brunese
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2010-10-28

4.  Cranial computed tomography in trauma: the accuracy of interpretation by staff in the emergency department.

Authors:  B Mucci; C Brett; L S Huntley; M K Greene
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.740

5.  The misinterpretation rates of radiology residents on emergent neuroradiology magnetic resonance (MR) angiogram studies: correlation with level of residency training.

Authors:  Christopher G Filippi; Russell E Meyer; Keith Cauley; Joshua P Nickerson; Heather N Burbank; Jason M Johnson; Grant J Linnell; Gray F Alsofrom
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2009-06-05

6.  The DePICTORS Study: discrepancies in preliminary interpretation of CT scans between on-call residents and staff.

Authors:  Jessica Walls; Natalie Hunter; Penelope M A Brasher; Stephen G F Ho
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2009-01-29

7.  Radiology resident evaluation of head CT scan orders in the emergency department.

Authors:  William K Erly; William G Berger; Elizabeth Krupinski; Joachim F Seeger; John A Guisto
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Comparison of emergency cranial CT interpretation between radiology residents and neuroradiologists: transverse versus three-dimensional images.

Authors:  Eun Soo Kim; Dae Young Yoon; Ha-yeon Lee; You Jin Ku; Ari Han; Soo Jeong Yoon; Heung Cheol Kim
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2014 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.630

9.  Interpretation of Computed Tomography of the Head: Emergency Physicians versus Radiologists.

Authors:  Ali Arhami Dolatabadi; Alireza Baratloo; Alaleh Rouhipour; Ali Abdalvand; Hamidreza Hatamabadi; Mohammadmehdi Forouzanfar; Majid Shojaee; Behrooz Hashemi
Journal:  Trauma Mon       Date:  2013-08-14

10.  Evaluating the accuracy of emergency medicine resident interpretations of abdominal CTs in patients with non-traumatic abdominal pain.

Authors:  Mun Ju Kang; Min Seob Sim; Tae Gun Shin; Ik Joon Jo; Hyoung Gon Song; Keun Jeong Song; Yeon Kwon Jeong
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 2.153

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.