Literature DB >> 16046750

Cranial computed tomography in trauma: the accuracy of interpretation by staff in the emergency department.

B Mucci1, C Brett, L S Huntley, M K Greene.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Cranial computed tomography (CT) is replacing skull radiography in head trauma. Rapid radiological opinions on these images may not always be available. We assessed the ability of our permanent emergency department staff to interpret the images.
METHODS: A retrospective series of 100 consecutive cases was reviewed and interpreted by five permanent emergency department medical staff, and their interpretation compared with the consensus opinion of two radiologists.
RESULTS: An overall agreement of 86.6% (95% confidence interval (CI) 83.4 to 89.9) was achieved, with a false negative rate of 4.2% (95% CI 3.9 to 4.3). No findings that would have changed the overnight management of any patient were missed.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results for CT scans are similar to studies of interpretation of other radiographic images in emergency departments. Our emergency staff could safely make the initial interpretation of cranial CT images in trauma out of hours, and formal reporting may wait until a suitably experienced radiologist is available.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16046750      PMCID: PMC1726873          DOI: 10.1136/emj.2003.013755

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Med J        ISSN: 1472-0205            Impact factor:   2.740


  15 in total

1.  Reducing errors made by emergency physicians in interpreting radiographs: longitudinal study.

Authors:  J A Espinosa; T W Nolan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-03-18

2.  Diagnostic errors in an accident and emergency department.

Authors:  H R Guly
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.740

3.  Resident interpretation of emergency computed tomographic scans.

Authors:  M H Roszler; K A McCarroll; T Rashid; K R Donovan; G A Kling
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 6.016

4.  Accuracy of detection of radiographic abnormalities by junior doctors.

Authors:  C A Vincent; P A Driscoll; R J Audley; D S Grant
Journal:  Arch Emerg Med       Date:  1988-06

5.  The night stalker effect: quality improvements with a dedicated night-call rotation.

Authors:  F A Mann; P L Danz
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 6.016

6.  Alterations of preliminary readings on radiographic examinations minimally affect outcomes of trauma patients discharged from the emergency department.

Authors:  S R Eachempati; N Flomenbaum; C Seifert; E Fischer; L J Hydo; P S Barie
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2000-04

7.  What is the effect of reporting all emergency department radiographs?

Authors:  J R Benger; I D Lyburn
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.740

8.  An assessment of the clinical effects of reporting accident and emergency radiographs.

Authors:  G de Lacey; A Barker; J Harper; B Wignall
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1980-04       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Should all casualty radiographs be reviewed?

Authors:  J Wardrope; P M Chennells
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1985-06-01

10.  Trainee reporting of computed tomography examinations: do they make mistakes and does it matter?

Authors:  J C Hillier; D J Tattersall; F V Gleeson
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.350

View more
  7 in total

1.  Comparing the accuracy of initial head CT reporting by radiologists, radiology trainees, neuroradiographers and emergency doctors.

Authors:  F A Gallagher; K Y Tay; S L Vowler; H Szutowicz; J J Cross; D J McAuley; N M Antoun
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Response to Mucci et al's study: "cranial computed tomography in trauma: the accuracy of interpretation by staff in the emergency department".

Authors:  A Hugman; A Boyle
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.740

3.  Comparing the brain CT scan interpretation of emergency medicine team with radiologists' report and its impact on patients' outcome.

Authors:  Mohammad-Taghi Talebian; Elahe Kavandi; Shervin Farahmand; Neda Shahlafar; Mona Arbab; Seyedhossein Seyedhosseini-Davarani; Amir Nejati; Shahram Bagheri-Hariri
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2014-10-30

4.  Radiologic estimation of hematoma volume in intracerebral hemorrhage trial by CT scan.

Authors:  R D Zimmerman; J A Maldjian; N C Brun; B Horvath; B E Skolnick
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Accuracy of Non-Contrast CT Brain Interpretation by Emergency Physicians: A cohort study.

Authors:  Anas Khan; Sami Qashqari; Abdul-Aziz Al-Ali
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.088

6.  Accuracy of Brain Computed Tomography Diagnosis by Emergency Medicine Physicians.

Authors:  Zohair Al Aseri; Mohamed Al Aqeel; Badr Aldawood; Fahad Albadr; Rawan Ghandour; Abdulaziz Al Mulaik; Mohammed A Malabarey; Anas Khan
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2022-09-26

7.  Rethinking Radiology: An Active Learning Curriculum for Head Computed Tomography Interpretation.

Authors:  Leonardo Aliaga; Samuel Owen Clarke
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2022-01-01
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.