Literature DB >> 2032104

Confirmation of endosonographic detection of external anal sphincter defects by simultaneous electromyographic mapping.

S J Burnett1, C T Speakman, M A Kamm, C I Bartram.   

Abstract

Anal endosonography was performed in 13 consecutive patients with post-traumatic faecal incontinence. Thirteen acoustic defects in the external anal sphincter (two hyperechoic, four of mixed echogenicity and seven hypoechoic) were analysed electromyographically by locating under ultrasound guidance the tip of a concentric needle within the defect. The electromyographic activity in this zone was compared with ultrasonically normal muscle. Eleven of 13 sonographic defects showed no electrical activity on electromyography, there was one technical electromyography failure, and one defect was too deep to be reached by the electromyography needle. The electromyographic response was normal in each case within ultrasonically normal muscle. Anal endosonography is recommended as the initial investigation to locate defects, which may be confirmed electromyographically thereby limiting the number of painful needle insertions required for complete mapping of the external anal sphincter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2032104     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800780419

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  13 in total

Review 1.  Fecal incontinence.

Authors:  M Lamah; D Kumar
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 2.  The usefulness of tests in anorectal disease.

Authors:  T G Parks
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1992 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Translabial ultrasound assessment of the anal sphincter complex: normal measurements of the internal and external anal sphincters at the proximal, mid-, and distal levels.

Authors:  Rebecca J Hall; Rebecca G Rogers; Lori Saiz; C Qualls
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2007-01-13

Review 4.  Anal endosonography in faecal incontinence.

Authors:  C I Bartram; A H Sultan
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 5.  Anal Fissure.

Authors:  Jennifer Sam Beaty; M Shashidharan
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2016-03

6.  Anorectal physiology measurements are of no value in clinical practice. True or false?

Authors:  N J Carty; B Moran; C D Johnson
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 1.891

7.  [Rectal endosonography in differential diagnosis of surgical diseases of the pelvis].

Authors:  B Gerdes; M Hamdy; M Lausen
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir       Date:  1994

8.  Anal pressure vectography is of no apparent benefit for sphincter evaluation.

Authors:  Y K Yang; S D Wexner
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Paediatric anal endosonography.

Authors:  N M Jones; M Smilgin-Humphreys; P B Sullivan; H W Grant
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2003-12-20       Impact factor: 1.827

10.  Anal sphincter defects. Correlation between endoanal ultrasound and surgery.

Authors:  K I Deen; D Kumar; J G Williams; J Olliff; M R Keighley
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.