Literature DB >> 14689218

Paediatric anal endosonography.

N M Jones1, M Smilgin-Humphreys, P B Sullivan, H W Grant.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study was performed to determine the endosonographic features of the anal canal in normal children and to compare these findings with the endosonographic features in children with congenital anorectal malformations.
METHODS: Two groups of children were examined by anal endosonography (AES): group 1 ( n=30) were controls, and group 2 ( n=15) were children born with anorectal malformations.
RESULTS: In the normal group, the sphincter elements were clearly visualised. The intersphincteric plane produced a double image, which differs from the adult appearance. Of 15 patients who had anorectoplasty, AES identified accurate placement of the neoanus within the sphincters in 13 and slight malposition in two patients.
CONCLUSIONS: This study details the endosonographic appearances of the anal canal in healthy children aged from 1 month to 14 years. AES provided useful anatomical detail in patients following anorectoplasty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14689218     DOI: 10.1007/s00383-003-0988-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int        ISSN: 0179-0358            Impact factor:   1.827


  18 in total

1.  Endosonographic anatomy of the normal anal canal compared with endocoil magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  A B Williams; C I Bartram; S Halligan; M M Marshall; R J Nicholls; W A Kmiot
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.585

2.  Confirmation of endosonographic detection of external anal sphincter defects by simultaneous electromyographic mapping.

Authors:  S J Burnett; C T Speakman; M A Kamm; C I Bartram
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  A comparison between electromyography and anal endosonography in mapping external anal sphincter defects.

Authors:  P J Law; M A Kamm; C I Bartram
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  The anatomical basis of anal endosonography. A study in postmortem specimens.

Authors:  B Gerdes; H H Köhler; A Zielke; O Kisker; P J Barth; B Stinner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Endoluminal ultrasound is preferable to electromyography in mapping anal sphincteric defects.

Authors:  J J Tjandra; J W Milsom; T Schroeder; V W Fazio
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 4.585

6.  Manometry, profilometry, and endosonography: normal physiology and anatomy of the anal canal in healthy children.

Authors:  M A Benninga; O B Wijers; C W van der Hoeven; J A Taminiau; P J Klopper; G N Tytgat; L M Akkermans
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 2.839

7.  Anal endosonography in asymptomatic subjects.

Authors:  M Papachrysostomou; S D Pye; S R Wild; A N Smith
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 2.423

8.  Anal endosonography for identifying external sphincter defects confirmed histologically.

Authors:  A H Sultan; M A Kamm; I C Talbot; R J Nicholls; C I Bartram
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Posterior sagittal anorectoplasty as a secondary operation for the treatment of fecal incontinence.

Authors:  A Peña
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 2.545

10.  The failed anoplasty: successful outcome after reoperative anoplasty and sigmoid resection.

Authors:  R L Moss
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 2.545

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.