Literature DB >> 2030927

Occupancy model of perceived numerosity.

J Allik1, T Tuulmets.   

Abstract

Observers saw 234 different pairs of stochastically organized dot patterns and indicated which of the two patterns appeared to be more numerous. All of the data can be accounted for by supposing that the choice of the more numerous pattern is based on the determination of the occupancy indices of both patterns. Each dot is posited to have an impact upon its neighborhood in a constant occupancy radius R. The area of the stimulus plane occupied collectively by all dots provides a basis for judging relative numerosity; the pattern with the larger occupancy value is chosen as more numerous. The occupancy model, besides providing a general explanation of known numerosity illusions in strictly quantitative terms, can explain some puzzling aspects of numerosity perception.

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2030927     DOI: 10.3758/bf03205986

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  10 in total

1.  The influence of context upon the estimation of number.

Authors:  W BEVAN; R A MAIER; H HELSON
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1963-09

2.  Effect of item arrangement on perceived numerosity: randomness vs regularity.

Authors:  N Ginsburg
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1976-10

3.  Measurement of visual cluster.

Authors:  N Ginsburg; S R Goldstein
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1987

4.  Interactions between area and numerosity.

Authors:  P G Vos; M P van Oeffelen; H J Tibosch; J Allik
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1988

5.  Reciprocity between luminance and dot density in the perception of brightness.

Authors:  J B Mulligan; D I MacLeod
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  The precision of numerosity discrimination in arrays of random dots.

Authors:  A Burgess; H B Barlow
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  A theory of the primitive spatial code in human vision.

Authors:  R J Watt; M J Morgan
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Perceived numerosity: a comparison of magnitude production, magnitude estimation, and discrimination judgments.

Authors:  L E Krueger
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1984-06

9.  A probabilistic model for the discrimination of visual number.

Authors:  M P van Oeffelen; P G Vos
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1982-08

10.  Spatial interaction in human cone vision.

Authors:  G Westheimer
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1967-05       Impact factor: 5.182

  10 in total
  49 in total

1.  Topology-defined units in numerosity perception.

Authors:  Lixia He; Ke Zhou; Tiangang Zhou; Sheng He; Lin Chen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Hierarchical number estimation.

Authors:  Jay Friedenberg; William Limratana
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2004-01-16

3.  Size invariance in visual number discrimination.

Authors:  J Allik; T Tuulmets; P G Vos
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1991

4.  Connectedness affects dot numerosity judgment: implications for configural processing.

Authors:  Lixia He; Jun Zhang; Tiangang Zhou; Lin Chen
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-06

5.  A spatial frequency spectral peakedness model predicts discrimination performance of regularity in dot patterns.

Authors:  Emmanouil D Protonotarios; Lewis D Griffin; Alan Johnston; Michael S Landy
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Counting absolute numbers of items, from 1 to 8, in pigeons.

Authors:  Shin Hirai; Masako Jitsumori
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.986

7.  Non-symbolic numerosity encoding escapes spatial frequency equalization.

Authors:  Andrea Adriano; Luisa Girelli; Luca Rinaldi
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-01-04

8.  Exploring whether nonhuman primates show a bias to overestimate dense quantities.

Authors:  Audrey E Parrish; Brielle T James; Michael J Beran
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.231

9.  Giraffes go for more: a quantity discrimination study in giraffes (Giraffa camelopardalis).

Authors:  Montserrat Colell; Federica Amici; Alvaro L Caicoya; Ruben Holland; Conrad Ensenyat
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 3.084

10.  Eye movements reveal distinct encoding patterns for number and cumulative surface area in random dot arrays.

Authors:  Darko Odic; Justin Halberda
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.