Literature DB >> 20305831

Integration Grid Errors for Meta-GGA-Predicted Reaction Energies: Origin of Grid Errors for the M06 Suite of Functionals.

Steven E Wheeler1, K N Houk.   

Abstract

We have assessed integration grid errors arising from the use of popular DFT quadrature schemes for a set of 34 organic reaction energies. The focus is primarily on M05-2X and the M06 suite of functionals (M06-L, M06, M06-2X, and M06-HF). M05-2X, M06, and M06-2X outperform popular older DFT functionals for the reaction energies studied, and offer accuracies comparable to results from perturbative hybrid DFT functionals. However, these new functionals are more sensitive to the choice of quadrature grid than previous generations of DFT functionals. Errors in predicted reaction energies arising from the use of the popular SG-1 grid, which is the default in the Q-Chem package, are significant. In particular, M06-HF reaction energies computed with the SG-1 grid exhibit errors ranging from -6.7 to 3.2 kcal mol(-1) relative to results computed with a very fine integration grid. This grid-sensitivity is not a problem for meta-GGA functionals in general, but is instead due to the specific functional forms used in these functionals. The large grid errors are traced to the kinetic energy density enhancement factor utilized in the exchange component of the M05-2X and M06 functionals. This term contains empirically adjusted parameters that are of large magnitude for all of the M06 functionals and for M06-HF in particular. The product of these large constants with modest integration errors for the kinetic energy density results in very large errors in individual contributions to the exchange energy. This gives rise to the troubling large errors exhibited by these functionals for certain integration grids.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 20305831      PMCID: PMC2840268          DOI: 10.1021/ct900639j

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput        ISSN: 1549-9618            Impact factor:   6.006


  18 in total

1.  Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple.

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  1996-10-28       Impact factor: 9.161

2.  Development of density functionals for thermochemical kinetics.

Authors:  A Daniel Boese; Jan M L Martin
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2004-08-22       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  Climbing the density functional ladder: nonempirical meta-generalized gradient approximation designed for molecules and solids.

Authors:  Jianmin Tao; John P Perdew; Viktor N Staroverov; Gustavo E Scuseria
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2003-09-30       Impact factor: 9.161

Review 4.  Advances in methods and algorithms in a modern quantum chemistry program package.

Authors:  Yihan Shao; Laszlo Fusti Molnar; Yousung Jung; Jörg Kussmann; Christian Ochsenfeld; Shawn T Brown; Andrew T B Gilbert; Lyudmila V Slipchenko; Sergey V Levchenko; Darragh P O'Neill; Robert A DiStasio; Rohini C Lochan; Tao Wang; Gregory J O Beran; Nicholas A Besley; John M Herbert; Ching Yeh Lin; Troy Van Voorhis; Siu Hung Chien; Alex Sodt; Ryan P Steele; Vitaly A Rassolov; Paul E Maslen; Prakashan P Korambath; Ross D Adamson; Brian Austin; Jon Baker; Edward F C Byrd; Holger Dachsel; Robert J Doerksen; Andreas Dreuw; Barry D Dunietz; Anthony D Dutoi; Thomas R Furlani; Steven R Gwaltney; Andreas Heyden; So Hirata; Chao-Ping Hsu; Gary Kedziora; Rustam Z Khalliulin; Phil Klunzinger; Aaron M Lee; Michael S Lee; Wanzhen Liang; Itay Lotan; Nikhil Nair; Baron Peters; Emil I Proynov; Piotr A Pieniazek; Young Min Rhee; Jim Ritchie; Edina Rosta; C David Sherrill; Andrew C Simmonett; Joseph E Subotnik; H Lee Woodcock; Weimin Zhang; Alexis T Bell; Arup K Chakraborty; Daniel M Chipman; Frerich J Keil; Arieh Warshel; Warren J Hehre; Henry F Schaefer; Jing Kong; Anna I Krylov; Peter M W Gill; Martin Head-Gordon
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2006-06-12       Impact factor: 3.676

5.  Density functional for spectroscopy: no long-range self-interaction error, good performance for Rydberg and charge-transfer states, and better performance on average than B3LYP for ground states.

Authors:  Yan Zhao; Donald G Truhlar
Journal:  J Phys Chem A       Date:  2006-12-14       Impact factor: 2.781

6.  A new local density functional for main-group thermochemistry, transition metal bonding, thermochemical kinetics, and noncovalent interactions.

Authors:  Yan Zhao; Donald G Truhlar
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2006-11-21       Impact factor: 3.488

7.  Semiempirical hybrid density functional with perturbative second-order correlation.

Authors:  Stefan Grimme
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2006-01-21       Impact factor: 3.488

8.  Towards chemical accuracy for the thermodynamics of large molecules: new hybrid density functionals including non-local correlation effects.

Authors:  Tobias Schwabe; Stefan Grimme
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 3.676

9.  Efficient density-functional theory integrations by locally augmented radial grids.

Authors:  Jürgen Gräfenstein; Dieter Cremer
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2007-10-28       Impact factor: 3.488

10.  How to compute isomerization energies of organic molecules with quantum chemical methods.

Authors:  Stefan Grimme; Marc Steinmetz; Martin Korth
Journal:  J Org Chem       Date:  2007-02-08       Impact factor: 4.354

View more
  27 in total

1.  Measurement and theory of hydrogen bonding contribution to isosteric DNA base pairs.

Authors:  Omid Khakshoor; Steven E Wheeler; K N Houk; Eric T Kool
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 15.419

2.  Revised M06-L functional for improved accuracy on chemical reaction barrier heights, noncovalent interactions, and solid-state physics.

Authors:  Ying Wang; Xinsheng Jin; Haoyu S Yu; Donald G Truhlar; Xiao He
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Revised M06 density functional for main-group and transition-metal chemistry.

Authors:  Ying Wang; Pragya Verma; Xinsheng Jin; Donald G Truhlar; Xiao He
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Directional Dependence of Hydrogen Bonds: a Density-based Energy Decomposition Analysis and Its Implications on Force Field Development.

Authors:  Zhenyu Lu; Nengjie Zhou; Qin Wu; Yingkai Zhang
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 6.006

5.  Are anion/pi interactions actually a case of simple charge-dipole interactions?

Authors:  Steven E Wheeler; K N Houk
Journal:  J Phys Chem A       Date:  2010-08-26       Impact factor: 2.781

6.  Why nature eschews the concerted [2 + 2 + 2] cycloaddition of a nonconjugated cyanodiyne. Computational study of a pyridine synthesis involving an ene-Diels-Alder-bimolecular hydrogen-transfer mechanism.

Authors:  Yu Lan; Rick L Danheiser; K N Houk
Journal:  J Org Chem       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 4.354

7.  Partition coefficients for the SAMPL5 challenge using transfer free energies.

Authors:  Michael R Jones; Bernard R Brooks; Angela K Wilson
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 3.686

8.  1,3-Dipolar cycloaddition reactivities of perfluorinated aryl azides with enamines and strained dipolarophiles.

Authors:  Sheng Xie; Steven A Lopez; Olof Ramström; Mingdi Yan; K N Houk
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 15.419

9.  Benchmarking the Performance of Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory Methods on Biochromophores.

Authors:  Yihan Shao; Ye Mei; Dage Sundholm; Ville R I Kaila
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2019-12-26       Impact factor: 6.006

10.  Long wavelength absorbing carbostyrils as test cases for different TDDFT procedures and solvent models.

Authors:  Anne-Marie Kelterer; Georg Uray; Walter M F Fabian
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 1.810

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.