Literature DB >> 17286442

How to compute isomerization energies of organic molecules with quantum chemical methods.

Stefan Grimme1, Marc Steinmetz, Martin Korth.   

Abstract

The reaction energies for 34 typical organic isomerizations including oxygen and nitrogen heteroatoms are investigated with modern quantum chemical methods that have the perspective of also being applicable to large systems. The experimental reaction enthalpies are corrected for vibrational and thermal effects, and the thus derived "experimental" reaction energies are compared to corresponding theoretical data. A series of standard AO basis sets in combination with second-order perturbation theory (MP2, SCS-MP2), conventional density functionals (e.g., PBE, TPSS, B3-LYP, MPW1K, BMK), and new perturbative functionals (B2-PLYP, mPW2-PLYP) are tested. In three cases, obvious errors of the experimental values could be detected, and accurate coupled-cluster [CCSD(T)] reference values have been used instead. It is found that only triple-zeta quality AO basis sets provide results close enough to the basis set limit and that sets like the popular 6-31G(d) should be avoided in accurate work. Augmentation of small basis sets with diffuse functions has a notable effect in B3-LYP calculations that is attributed to intramolecular basis set superposition error and covers basic deficiencies of the functional. The new methods based on perturbation theory (SCS-MP2, X2-PLYP) are found to be clearly superior to many other approaches; that is, they provide mean absolute deviations of less than 1.2 kcal mol-1 and only a few (<10%) outliers. The best performance in the group of conventional functionals is found for the highly parametrized BMK hybrid meta-GGA. Contrary to accepted opinion, hybrid density functionals offer no real advantage over simple GGAs. For reasonably large AO basis sets, results of poor quality are obtained with the popular B3-LYP functional that cannot be recommended for thermochemical applications in organic chemistry. The results of this study are complementary to often used benchmarks based on atomization energies and should guide chemists in their search for accurate and efficient computational thermochemistry methods.

Entities:  

Year:  2007        PMID: 17286442     DOI: 10.1021/jo062446p

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Org Chem        ISSN: 0022-3263            Impact factor:   4.354


  16 in total

1.  Mechanistic investigation of the base-promoted cycloselenoetherification of pent-4-en-1-ol.

Authors:  Marina D Rvovic; Vera M Divac; Ralph Puchta; Zorica M Bugarčić
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2010-08-15       Impact factor: 1.810

2.  Stability and isomerization of complexes formed by metal ions and cytosine isomers in aqueous phase.

Authors:  Hongqi Ai; Jingjing Liu; Kwaichow Chan
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2013-05-25       Impact factor: 1.810

3.  An assessment of DFT methods for predicting the thermochemistry of ion-molecule reactions of group 14 elements (Si, Ge, Sn).

Authors:  Igor S Ignatyev; Manuel Montejo; Juan Jesús López González
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 1.810

Review 4.  Quantum mechanical investigations of organocatalysis: mechanisms, reactivities, and selectivities.

Authors:  Paul Ha-Yeon Cheong; Claude Y Legault; Joann M Um; Nihan Çelebi-Ölçüm; K N Houk
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 60.622

5.  Benchmarking density functional tight binding models for barrier heights and reaction energetics of organic molecules.

Authors:  Maja Gruden; Ljubica Andjeklović; Akkarapattiakal Kuriappan Jissy; Stepan Stepanović; Matija Zlatar; Qiang Cui; Marcus Elstner
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 3.376

6.  Toxicity testing in the 21st century: a vision and a strategy.

Authors:  Daniel Krewski; Daniel Acosta; Melvin Andersen; Henry Anderson; John C Bailar; Kim Boekelheide; Robert Brent; Gail Charnley; Vivian G Cheung; Sidney Green; Karl T Kelsey; Nancy I Kerkvliet; Abby A Li; Lawrence McCray; Otto Meyer; Reid D Patterson; William Pennie; Robert A Scala; Gina M Solomon; Martin Stephens; James Yager; Lauren Zeise
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 6.393

7.  Integration Grid Errors for Meta-GGA-Predicted Reaction Energies: Origin of Grid Errors for the M06 Suite of Functionals.

Authors:  Steven E Wheeler; K N Houk
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2010-02-09       Impact factor: 6.006

8.  Accurate reaction enthalpies and sources of error in DFT thermochemistry for aldol, Mannich, and alpha-aminoxylation reactions.

Authors:  Steven E Wheeler; Antonio Moran; Susan N Pieniazek; K N Houk
Journal:  J Phys Chem A       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 2.781

9.  Tandem mass spectrometry measurement of the collision products of carbamate anions derived from CO2 capture sorbents: paving the way for accurate quantitation.

Authors:  Phil Jackson; Keith J Fisher; Moetaz Ibrahim Attalla
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2011-06-09       Impact factor: 3.109

10.  Benchmark study of the performance of density functional theory for bond activations with (ni,pd)-based transition-metal catalysts.

Authors:  Marc Steinmetz; Stefan Grimme
Journal:  ChemistryOpen       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 2.911

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.