Electron-transfer dissociation (ETD) with supplemental activation of the doubly charged deamidated tryptic digested peptide ions allows differentiation of isoaspartic acid and aspartic acid residues using the c + 57 or z*-57 peaks. The diagnostic peak clearly localizes and characterizes the isoaspartic acid residue. Supplemental activation in ETD of the doubly charged peptide ions involves resonant excitation of the charge reduced precursor radical cations and leads to further dissociation, including extra backbone cleavages and secondary fragmentation. Supplemental activation is essential to obtain a high quality ETD spectrum (especially for doubly charged peptide ions) with sequence information. Unfortunately, the low-resolution of the ion trap mass spectrometer makes detection of the diagnostic peak, [M-60], for the aspartic acid residue difficult due to interference with side-chain loss from arginine and glutamic acid residues. Copyright 2010. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Electron-transfer dissociation (ETD) with supplemental activation of the doubly charged deamidated tryptic digested peptide ions allows differentiation of n class="Chemical">isoaspartic acid and aspartic acid residues using the c + 57 or z*-57 peaks. The diagnostic peak clearly localizes and characterizes the isoaspartic acid residue. Supplemental activation in ETD of the doubly charged peptide ions involves resonant excitation of the charge reduced precursor radical cations and leads to further dissociation, including extra backbone cleavages and secondary fragmentation. Supplemental activation is essential to obtain a high quality ETD spectrum (especially for doubly charged peptide ions) with sequence information. Unfortunately, the low-resolution of the ion trap mass spectrometer makes detection of the diagnostic peak, [M-60], for the aspartic acid residue difficult due to interference with side-chain loss from arginine and glutamic acid residues. Copyright 2010. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Authors: Jason J Cournoyer; Jason L Pittman; Vera B Ivleva; Eric Fallows; Lucy Waskell; Catherine E Costello; Peter B O'Connor Journal: Protein Sci Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 6.725
Authors: A E Roher; J D Lowenson; S Clarke; C Wolkow; R Wang; R J Cotter; I M Reardon; H A Zürcher-Neely; R L Heinrikson; M J Ball Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 1993-02-15 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Stanislav I Pekov; Daniil G Ivanov; Anna E Bugrova; Maria I Indeykina; Natalia V Zakharova; Igor A Popov; Alexey S Kononikhin; Sergey A Kozin; Alexander A Makarov; Evgeny N Nikolaev Journal: J Am Soc Mass Spectrom Date: 2019-05-09 Impact factor: 3.109
Authors: Sarah Rogstad; Anneliese Faustino; Ashley Ruth; David Keire; Michael Boyne; Jun Park Journal: J Am Soc Mass Spectrom Date: 2016-11-21 Impact factor: 3.109
Authors: Kshitij Khatri; Yi Pu; Joshua A Klein; Juan Wei; Catherine E Costello; Cheng Lin; Joseph Zaia Journal: J Am Soc Mass Spectrom Date: 2018-04-16 Impact factor: 3.109
Authors: Shujia Dai; Wenqin Ni; Alexander N Patananan; Steven G Clarke; Barry L Karger; Zhaohui Sunny Zhou Journal: Anal Chem Date: 2013-02-06 Impact factor: 6.986
Authors: Xiang Yu; Nadezda P Sargaeva; Christopher J Thompson; Catherine E Costello; Cheng Lin Journal: Int J Mass Spectrom Date: 2015-11-15 Impact factor: 1.986