Literature DB >> 20302955

Phylogeographic analysis and environmental niche modeling of the plain-bellied watersnake (Nerodia erythrogaster) reveals low levels of genetic and ecological differentiation.

Robert Makowsky1, John C Marshall, John McVay, Paul T Chippindale, Leslie J Rissler.   

Abstract

Species that exhibit geographically defined phenotypic variation traditionally have been divided into subspecies. Subspecies based on phenotypic features may not comprise monophyletic groups due to selection, gene flow, and/or convergent evolution. In many taxonomic groups the number of species once designated as widespread is dwindling rapidly, and many workers reject the concept of subspecies altogether. We tested whether currently recognized subspecies in the plain-bellied watersnake Nerodia erythrogaster are concordant with relationships based on mitochondrial markers, and whether it represents a single widespread species. The range of this taxon spans multiple potential biogeographic barriers (especially the Mississippi and Apalachicola Rivers) that correspond with lineage breaks in many species, including other snakes. We sequenced three mitochondrial genes (NADH-II, Cyt-b, Cox-I) from 156 geo-referenced specimens and developed ecological niche models using Maxent and spatially explicit climate data to examine historical and ecological factors affecting variation in N. erythrogaster across its range. Overall, we found little support for the recognized subspecies as either independent evolutionary lineages or geographically circumscribed units and conclude that although some genetic and niche differentiation has occurred, most populations assigned to N. erythrogaster appear to represent a single, widespread species. However, additional sampling and application of nuclear markers are necessary to clarify the status of the easternmost populations. 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20302955      PMCID: PMC3322375          DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2010.03.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol        ISSN: 1055-7903            Impact factor:   4.286


  39 in total

Review 1.  Using phylogeographic analyses of gene trees to test species status and processes.

Authors:  A R Templeton
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 6.185

2.  MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models.

Authors:  Fredrik Ronquist; John P Huelsenbeck
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2003-08-12       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Stabilizing selection on behavior and morphology masks positive selection on the signal in a salamander pheromone signaling complex.

Authors:  Richard A Watts; Catherine A Palmer; Richard C Feldhoff; Pamela W Feldhoff; Lynne D Houck; Adam G Jones; Michael E Pfrender; Stephanie M Rollmann; Stevan J Arnold
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2004-03-10       Impact factor: 16.240

Review 4.  Taxonomic considerations in listing subspecies under the U.S. Endangered Species Act.

Authors:  Susan M Haig; Erik A Beever; Steven M Chambers; Hope M Draheim; Bruce D Dugger; Susie Dunham; Elise Elliott-Smith; Joseph B Fontaine; Dylan C Kesler; Brian J Knaus; Iara F Lopes; Pete Loschl; Thomas D Mullins; Lisa M Sheffield
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 6.560

5.  Phylogeography of postglacial range expansion in Nigronia serricornis Say (Megaloptera: Corydalidae).

Authors:  J S Heilveil; S H Berlocher
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 6.185

6.  AWTY (are we there yet?): a system for graphical exploration of MCMC convergence in Bayesian phylogenetics.

Authors:  Johan A A Nylander; James C Wilgenbusch; Dan L Warren; David L Swofford
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-08-30       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  Phylogenetic relationships between spiny, slipper and coral lobsters (Crustacea, Decapoda, Achelata).

Authors:  Ferran Palero; Keith A Crandall; Pere Abelló; Enrique Macpherson; Marta Pascual
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2008-10-14       Impact factor: 4.286

8.  Lineage diversification in a widespread species: roles for niche divergence and conservatism in the common kingsnake, Lampropeltis getula.

Authors:  R Alexander Pyron; Frank T Burbrink
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2009-07-31       Impact factor: 6.185

Review 9.  Mitochondrial DNA under siege in avian phylogeography.

Authors:  Robert M Zink; George F Barrowclough
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2008-04-03       Impact factor: 6.185

10.  Molecular systematics and evolution of Regina and the thamnophiine snakes.

Authors:  M E Alfaro; S J Arnold
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.286

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Bayesian tests of topology hypotheses with an example from diving beetles.

Authors:  Johannes Bergsten; Anders N Nilsson; Fredrik Ronquist
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2013-04-28       Impact factor: 15.683

2.  Regional patterns of genetic structure and environmental differentiation in willow populations (Salix humboldtiana Willd.) from Central Mexico.

Authors:  Mariana S Hernández-Leal; Marco Suárez-Atilano; Daniel Piñero; Antonio González-Rodríguez
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 2.912

3.  Existence of Bov-B LINE Retrotransposons in Snake Lineages Reveals Recent Multiple Horizontal Gene Transfers with Copy Number Variation.

Authors:  Weerada Puinongpo; Worapong Singchat; Supaporn Petpradub; Ekaphan Kraichak; Mitsuo Nunome; Nararat Laopichienpong; Ratchaphol Thongchum; Thanphong Intarasorn; Siwapech Sillapaprayoon; Chantra Indananda; Narongrit Muangmai; Sunutcha Suntrarachun; Sudarath Baicharoen; Lawan Chanhome; Surin Peyachoknagul; Kornsorn Srikulnath
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 4.096

4.  Reevaluation of a classic phylogeographic barrier: new techniques reveal the influence of microgeographic climate variation on population divergence.

Authors:  J Angel Soto-Centeno; Lisa N Barrow; Julie M Allen; David L Reed
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 2.912

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.