Literature DB >> 20301013

Intake of added sugars and selected nutrients in the United States, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2003-2006.

Bernadette P Marriott1, Lauren Olsho, Louise Hadden, Patty Connor.   

Abstract

In the Institute of Medicine (IOM) macronutrient report the Committee recommended a maximal intake of < or = 25% of energy from added sugars. The primary objectives of this study were to utilize National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) to update the reference table data on intake of added sugars from the IOM report and compute food sources of added sugars. We combined data from NHANES with the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) MyPyramid Equivalents Database (MPED) and calculated individual added sugars intake as percent of total energy then classified individuals into 8 added sugars percent energy categories, calculated usual intake with the National Cancer Institute (NCI) method, and compared intakes to the Dietary Reference Intakes (DRIs). Nutrients at most risk for inadequacy based on the Estimated Average Requirements (EARs) were vitamins E, A, C, and magnesium. Nutrient intake was less with each 5% increase in added sugars intake above 5-10%. Thirteen percent of the population had added sugars intake > 25%. The mean g-eq added sugars intake of 83.1 g-eq/day and added sugars food sources were comparable to the mid-1990s. Higher added sugars intakes were associated with higher proportions of individuals with nutrient intakes below the EAR, but the overall high calorie and the low quality of the U.S. diet remained the predominant issue. With over 80% of the population at risk for select nutrient inadequacy, guidance may need to focus on targeted healthful diet communication to reach the highest risk demographic groups for specific life stage nutrient inadequacies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20301013     DOI: 10.1080/10408391003626223

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr        ISSN: 1040-8398            Impact factor:   11.176


  88 in total

1.  Evaluation of a novel biomarker of added sugar intake (δ 13C) compared with self-reported added sugar intake and the Healthy Eating Index-2010 in a community-based, rural U.S. sample.

Authors:  Valisa E Hedrick; Brenda M Davy; Grace A Wilburn; A Hope Jahren; Jamie M Zoellner
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 4.022

2.  Sex modifies the consequences of extended fructose consumption on liver health, motor function, and physiological damage in rats.

Authors:  Molly M Hyer; Samya K Dyer; Alix Kloster; Anum Adrees; Thomas Taetzsch; Jonathan Feaster; Gregorio Valdez; Gretchen N Neigh
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 3.619

3.  Fructose-fed rhesus monkeys: a nonhuman primate model of insulin resistance, metabolic syndrome, and type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Andrew A Bremer; Kimber L Stanhope; James L Graham; Bethany P Cummings; Wenli Wang; Benjamin R Saville; Peter J Havel
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.689

Review 4.  Fructose-containing sugars and cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  James M Rippe; Theodore J Angelopoulos
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 8.701

5.  Sugar-sweetened and artificially sweetened beverage consumption and risk of type 2 diabetes in men.

Authors:  Lawrence de Koning; Vasanti S Malik; Eric B Rimm; Walter C Willett; Frank B Hu
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 7.045

6.  Metabolic responses to prolonged consumption of glucose- and fructose-sweetened beverages are not associated with postprandial or 24-h glucose and insulin excursions.

Authors:  Kimber L Stanhope; Steven C Griffen; Andrew A Bremer; Roel G Vink; Ernst J Schaefer; Katsuyuki Nakajima; Jean-Marc Schwarz; Carine Beysen; Lars Berglund; Nancy L Keim; Peter J Havel
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 7.045

7.  Adolescents perceive a low added sugar adequate fiber diet to be more satiating and equally palatable compared to a high added sugar low fiber diet in a randomized-crossover design controlled feeding pilot trial.

Authors:  Tanya M Halliday; Sarah V Liu; Lori B Moore; Valisa E Hedrick; Brenda M Davy
Journal:  Eat Behav       Date:  2018-05-05

8.  Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, e-selectin and C-reactive protein levels in response to 4-week very-high-fructose or -glucose diets.

Authors:  G Silbernagel; J Machann; H-U Häring; A Fritsche; A Peter
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 9.  Too sweet: Problems of protein glycation in the eye.

Authors:  Eloy Bejarano; Allen Taylor
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 3.467

10.  Impact of dietary fat on the development of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in Ldlr-/- mice.

Authors:  Donald B Jump; Christopher M Depner; Sasmita Tripathy; Kelli A Lytle
Journal:  Proc Nutr Soc       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 6.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.