Literature DB >> 20300907

Relation of left-ventricular dyssynchrony by phase analysis of gated SPECT images and cardiovascular events in patients with implantable cardiac defibrillators.

Wael A Aljaroudi1, Fadi G Hage, Daniel Hermann, Harish Doppalapudi, Rajesh Venkataraman, Jaekyeong Heo, Ami E Iskandrian.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Left-ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony could be measured by gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI). This study examined the relation between the degree of dyssynchrony and outcome in patients with implantable cardiac defibrillators (ICDs). METHODS AND
RESULTS: We studied 70 patients with ICD and LV ejection fraction (EF) <.40 by gated MPI (performed within 6 weeks of the device implantation). The images were re-processed using phase analysis to derive phase standard deviation (SD) and histogram bandwidth. All-cause mortality and appropriate ICD shocks were identified as the primary endpoint. There were 87% men, aged 62 +/- 11 years. The EF was 26 +/- 8% (range 12%-39%). The phase SD was 51 degrees +/- 20 degrees (range 12 degrees -99 degrees ) and the histogram bandwidth was 157 degrees +/- 72 degrees (range 21 degrees -327 degrees ). The SD and bandwidth were significantly greater than corresponding values in patients with normal EF (15.8 +/- 11.8 degrees and 42.0 +/- 28.4 degrees , respectively, P < .0001, each). At 1 year, 8 patients (11%) died or had shocks. The patients with events had higher phase SD than those without events (60 +/- 5 degrees vs 50 +/- 21 degrees , P = .002). The histogram bandwidth was also higher in those with events (185 +/- 37 vs 154 +/- 75, P = .07). All patients with event had a phase SD >or= 50 degrees , while none of the patients with a phase SD < 50 degrees (N = 26) had an event (P = .02).
CONCLUSIONS: The severity of LV dyssynchrony by phase analysis in patients with LV dysfunction, and ICD is associated with increased risk of death and appropriate ICD shock; a phase SD < 50 degrees was associated with no events at 1 year.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20300907     DOI: 10.1007/s12350-009-9169-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol        ISSN: 1071-3581            Impact factor:   5.952


  38 in total

Review 1.  Scintigraphic blood pool and phase image analysis: the optimal tool for the evaluation of resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Elias H Botvinick
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Automated assessment of serial SPECT myocardial perfusion images.

Authors:  Ami E Iskandrian; Ernest V Garcia; Tracy Faber; John J Mahmarian
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Optimization and validation of radionuclide angiography phase analysis parameters for quantification of mechanical dyssynchrony.

Authors:  Richard Wassenaar; David O'Connor; Barbora Dej; Terrence David Ruddy; David Birnie
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2009-07-22       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Economic impact of heart failure in the United States: time for a different approach.

Authors:  J B O'Connell; M R Bristow
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  1994 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 10.247

5.  Evaluation of left ventricular performance by gated radionuclide angiography.

Authors:  B H Greenberg; D Drew; E H Botvinick; J A Werner; S C Klausner; D M Shames; W W Parmley
Journal:  Clin Nucl Med       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 7.794

6.  The frequency and incremental cost of major complications among medicare beneficiaries receiving implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.

Authors:  Matthew R Reynolds; David J Cohen; Aaron D Kugelmass; Phillip P Brown; Edmund R Becker; Steven D Culler; April W Simon
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2006-05-30       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with a narrow QRS complex.

Authors:  Gabe B Bleeker; Eduard R Holman; Paul Steendijk; Eric Boersma; Ernst E van der Wall; Martin J Schalij; Jeroen J Bax
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2006-11-09       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Mechanical dyssynchrony or myocardial shortening as MRI predictor of response to biventricular pacing?

Authors:  Iris K Rüssel; Jaco J M Zwanenburg; Tjeerd Germans; J Tim Marcus; Cornelis P Allaart; Carel C de Cock; Marco J W Götte; Albert C van Rossum
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  Emerging role of myocardial perfusion imaging to evaluate patients for cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Mark A Trimble; Salvador Borges-Neto; Eric J Velazquez; Ji Chen; Linda K Shaw; Robert Pagnanelli; Ernest V Garcia; Ami E Iskandrian
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2008-05-28       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  Evaluation of left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony as determined by phase analysis of ECG-gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and conduction disturbances.

Authors:  Mark A Trimble; Salvador Borges-Neto; Stuart Smallheiser; Ji Chen; Emily F Honeycutt; Linda K Shaw; Jaekyeong Heo; Robert A Pagnanelli; E Lindsey Tauxe; Ernest V Garcia; Fabio Esteves; Frank Seghatol-Eslami; G Neal Kay; Ami E Iskandrian
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2007-04-18       Impact factor: 5.952

View more
  43 in total

1.  Alternative methods for the assessment of mechanical dyssynchrony using phase analysis of gated single photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Wael AlJaroudi; Wael A Jaber; Richard A Grimm; Thomas Marwick; Manuel D Cerqueira
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) techniques for resynchronization: phase analysis and equilibrium radionuclide angiocardiography.

Authors:  Kenneth C Bilchick
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Predicting cardiac events using ventricular dyssynchrony in patients who received implantable cardioverter defibrillators: Are more treatment options required?

Authors:  Keiichiro Yoshinaga
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony in patients with coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Nili Zafrir
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  Assessment of left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony in coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Chetan D Patel; Anirban Mukherjee
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  Left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony by phase analysis as a prognostic indicator in heart failure.

Authors:  Fadi G Hage
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  The prognostic value of left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony using gated myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with end-stage renal disease.

Authors:  Himanshu Aggarwal; Wael A AlJaroudi; Shikha Mehta; Roslyn Mannon; Jaekyeong Heo; Ami E Iskandrian; Fadi G Hage
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2014-05-24       Impact factor: 5.952

8.  Left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony assessment in long-standing type II diabetes mellitus patients with normal gated SPECT-MPI.

Authors:  Dharmender Malik; Bhagwant Mittal; Ashwani Sood; Madan Parmar; Gurvinder Kaur; Ajay Bahl
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 5.952

9.  Prognostic value of left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony by phase analysis in patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy with ejection fraction 35-50% and QRS < 150 ms.

Authors:  Adam S Goldberg; M Chadi Alraies; Manuel D Cerqueira; Wael A Jaber; Wael A Aljaroudi
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 5.952

10.  Vasodilator stress and left ventricular asynchrony.

Authors:  Saurabh Malhotra; John M Canty
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 5.952

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.