Literature DB >> 19626384

Optimization and validation of radionuclide angiography phase analysis parameters for quantification of mechanical dyssynchrony.

Richard Wassenaar1, David O'Connor, Barbora Dej, Terrence David Ruddy, David Birnie.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has the potential to improve the outcome of patients suffering from mechanical dyssynchrony and heart failure. It has been suggested that accurate quantification of baseline extent of mechanical dyssynchrony may lead to pre-selection of patients likely to respond to CRT. The standard deviation from a phase histogram (phaseSD), synchrony (S) and entropy (E) are parameters obtained from phase analysis of planar radionuclide angiography (RNA) that may provide an accurate means of assessing mechanical dyssynchrony. In this paper, the ability of phaseSD, S, and E to detect mechanical dyssynchrony was investigated and optimal values for image smoothing, histogram noise thresholding, and bin size were defined. Finally, the intra- and inter-observer reproducibility of the methodology was assessed.
METHODS: PhaseSD, S, and E were calculated for 37 normal subjects (LVEF > 50%, end-diastolic volume < 120 mL, end-systolic volume < 60 mL, QRS < 120 ms, and normal wall motion) and 53 patients with mechanical dyssynchrony (LVEF < 30%, QRS > 120 ms, and typical LBBB). Receiver-operator characteristics (ROC) curves were created and the area under the curve (AUC), for each parameter, was determined using three different imaging filters (no filter and an order 5 Hann filter with cut-off of 5/50 and 10/50). The AUC was also determined using histogram threshold values varying between 0% and 50% (of the max amplitude value). Finally, AUC for E was determined for bins sizes varying between 1 degrees and 20 degrees . Inter- and intra-observer variability was calculated at optimal imaging values.
RESULTS: No smoothing was found to maximize the AUC. The AUC was independent of histogram threshold value. However, a value of 20% provided optimal visualization of the phase image. The AUC was also independent of bin size. At the optimal imaging values, the sensitivity and specificity for all parameters for detection of mechanical dyssynchrony was measured to be 89-100%. Inter- and intra-observer correlation coefficients >0.99 were found for phaseSD, S and E.
CONCLUSIONS: Optimized planar RNA phase analysis parameters, phaseSD, S, and E, were able to detect mechanical dyssynchrony with low inter- and intra-observer variability. Studies assessing the ability of these parameters to predict CRT outcome are required.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19626384     DOI: 10.1007/s12350-009-9119-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol        ISSN: 1071-3581            Impact factor:   5.952


  23 in total

1.  Delayed enhancement magnetic resonance imaging predicts response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with intraventricular dyssynchrony.

Authors:  James A White; Raymond Yee; Xiaping Yuan; Andrew Krahn; Allan Skanes; Michele Parker; George Klein; Maria Drangova
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2006-10-31       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Optimisation of cardiac resynchronisation therapy: addressing the problem of "non-responders".

Authors:  D J Fox; A P Fitzpatrick; N C Davidson
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 3.  Assessment of left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony by phase analysis of ECG-gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Ji Chen; Maureen M Henneman; Mark A Trimble; Jeroen J Bax; Salvador Borges-Neto; Ami E Iskandrian; Kenneth J Nichols; Ernest V Garcia
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  A unique method by which to quantitate synchrony with equilibrium radionuclide angiography.

Authors:  J William O'Connell; Carole Schreck; Michael Moles; Nitish Badwar; Theresa DeMarco; Jeffrey Olgin; Byron Lee; Zian Tseng; Uday Kumar; Elias H Botvinick
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  Clinical trials update: Highlights of the Scientific Sessions of Heart Failure 2001, a meeting of the Working Group on Heart Failure of the European Society of Cardiology. CONTAK-CD, CHRISTMAS, OPTIME-CHF.

Authors:  S Thackray; A Coletta; P Jones; A Dunn; A L Clark; J G Cleland
Journal:  Eur J Heart Fail       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 15.534

Review 6.  The problem of non-response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  David H Birnie; Anthony Sl Tang
Journal:  Curr Opin Cardiol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.161

7.  Left ventricular dyssynchrony predicts response and prognosis after cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Jeroen J Bax; Gabe B Bleeker; Thomas H Marwick; Sander G Molhoek; Eric Boersma; Paul Steendijk; Ernst E van der Wall; Martin J Schalij
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2004-11-02       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Reproducibility of the ventricular synchronization parameters assessed by multiharmonic phase analysis of radionuclide angiography in the normal heart.

Authors:  J F Toussaint; A Peix; T Lavergne; F Ponce Vicente; M Froissart; C Alonso; P Kolar; J Y Le Heuzey; L Guize; M Paillard
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.357

9.  An accurate means of detecting and characterizing abnormal patterns of ventricular activation by phase image analysis.

Authors:  E H Botvinick; M A Frais; D W Shosa; J W O'Connell; J A Pacheco-Alvarez; M Scheinman; R S Hattner; F Morady; D B Faulkner
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  Myocardial perfusion imaging using gated SPECT in heart failure patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Roberto Sciagrà; Marzia Giaccardi; Maria Cristina Porciani; Andrea Colella; Antonio Michelucci; Paolo Pieragnoli; Gianfranco Gensini; Alberto Pupi; Luigi Padeletti
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 10.057

View more
  12 in total

1.  Cardiac dyssynchrony: we have the tools. It is time to use them.

Authors:  Steven Port
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  SPECT blood pool phase analysis can accurately and reproducibly quantify mechanical dyssynchrony.

Authors:  Michel Lalonde; David Birnie; Terrence D Ruddy; Robert A deKemp; Richard W Wassenaar
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 3.  Nonechocardiographic imaging in evaluation for cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Wael AlJaroudi; Ji Chen; Wael A Jaber; Steven G Lloyd; Manuel D Cerqueira; Thomas Marwick
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 7.792

4.  The role of nuclear medicine in assessments of cardiac dyssynchrony.

Authors:  Masanao Naya; Osamu Manabe; Kazuhiro Koyanagawa; Nagara Tamaki
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  Assessment of left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony by phase analysis of gated-SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging and tissue Doppler imaging: comparison between QGS and ECTb software packages.

Authors:  Fereydoon Rastgou; Maryam Shojaeifard; Ahmad Amin; Tahereh Ghaedian; Hasan Firoozabadi; Hadi Malek; Nahid Yaghoobi; Ahmad Bitarafan-Rajabi; Majid Haghjoo; Hedieh Amouzadeh; Hossein Barati
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  Evaluation of baseline contractile reserve vs dyssynchrony as a predictor of functional improvement and long term outcome after resynchronization pacing therapy: a radionuclide stress study.

Authors:  Edoardo Verna; Sergio Ghiringhelli; Simone Scotti; Fabrizio Caravati
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  Phase analysis of gated blood pool SPECT for multiple stress testing assessments of ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony in a tachycardia-induced dilated cardiomyopathy canine model.

Authors:  Samaneh Salimian; Bernard Thibault; Vincent Finnerty; Jean Grégoire; François Harel
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 5.952

8.  Relation of left-ventricular dyssynchrony by phase analysis of gated SPECT images and cardiovascular events in patients with implantable cardiac defibrillators.

Authors:  Wael A Aljaroudi; Fadi G Hage; Daniel Hermann; Harish Doppalapudi; Rajesh Venkataraman; Jaekyeong Heo; Ami E Iskandrian
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 5.952

9.  Cardiac resynchronization therapy; the importance of evaluating cardiac metabolism.

Authors:  E E van der Wall; M J Schalij; A van der Laarse; J J Bax
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-02-12       Impact factor: 2.357

10.  Cardiac resynchronization therapy; evaluation by advanced imaging techniques.

Authors:  E E van der Wall; M J Schalij; J J Bax
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 2.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.