Literature DB >> 2027972

Effect of bone distribution on vertebral strength: assessment with patient-specific nonlinear finite element analysis.

K G Faulkner1, C E Cann, B H Hasegawa.   

Abstract

Three-dimensional quantitative computed tomographic (QCT) studies of the lumbar spine were extended with finite element analysis (FEA) to include bone distribution in assessment of vertebral body strength. Fifty-nine FEA models were created from data from 43 patients, 28 with no evidence of osteoporosis and 15 with previous vertebral fractures. Simulated loads were applied to the vertebral models to estimate vertebral strength. Yield strength in the models from patients with osteoporosis was 0.22-1.05 MPa (average, 0.57 MPa +/- 0.26 [mean +/- standard deviation]), compared with 0.80-2.79 MPa (1.46 +/- 0.52, P less than .001) in patients with normal bone. Yield strength of vertebrae in patients with osteoporosis uniformly fell below approximately 1.0 MPa, with minimal overlap between patients with osteoporosis and those with normal bone compared with the overlap in bone mineral content and trabecular mineral density. Reproducibility of the FEA technique was 12.1% in a subgroup of patients with normal bone. A constant relationship between cortical and trabecular contributions was observed in patients with osteoporosis but not in control patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2027972     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.179.3.2027972

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  42 in total

Review 1.  Current methods and advances in bone densitometry.

Authors:  G Guglielmi; C C Gluer; S Majumdar; B A Blunt; H K Genant
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Phantomless calibration of CT scans for measurement of BMD and bone strength-Inter-operator reanalysis precision.

Authors:  David C Lee; Paul F Hoffmann; David L Kopperdahl; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  Simulation of the behaviour of the L1 vertebra for different material properties and loading conditions.

Authors:  Ibrahim Erdem; Eeric Truumees; Marjolein C H van der Meulen
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 1.763

4.  Calibration of the mechanical properties in a finite element model of a lumbar vertebra under dynamic compression up to failure.

Authors:  Anaïs Garo; Pierre Jean Arnoux; Eric Wagnac; Carl Eric Aubin
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2011-09-25       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 5.  Computed tomography-based finite element analysis to assess fracture risk and osteoporosis treatment.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Imai
Journal:  World J Exp Med       Date:  2015-08-20

Review 6.  A biomechanical perspective on bone quality.

Authors:  C J Hernandez; T M Keaveny
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2006-07-28       Impact factor: 4.398

7.  Locations of bone tissue at high risk of initial failure during compressive loading of the human vertebral body.

Authors:  Senthil K Eswaran; Atul Gupta; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2007-06-19       Impact factor: 4.398

8.  Considerations for development of surrogate endpoints for antifracture efficacy of new treatments in osteoporosis: a perspective.

Authors:  Mary L Bouxsein; Pierre D Delmas
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Role of trabecular microarchitecture in whole-vertebral body biomechanical behavior.

Authors:  Aaron J Fields; Senthil K Eswaran; Michael G Jekir; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 10.  Advanced CT based in vivo methods for the assessment of bone density, structure, and strength.

Authors:  K Engelke; C Libanati; T Fuerst; P Zysset; H K Genant
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 5.096

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.