Literature DB >> 2027434

Can recognition of living things be selectively impaired?

M J Farah1, P A McMullen, M M Meyer.   

Abstract

Brain damage sometimes seems to impair recognition of living things, despite relatively preserved recognition of nonliving things. The most straightforward interpretation of this dissociation is that the recognition of living things depends on some specialized mechanisms that are not needed for the recognition of nonliving things. However, there are alternative interpretations of the dissociation in terms of the greater complexity or inter-item similarity of living things, or the more specific, within-category identifications that are usually required for living things. Surprisingly, the relevant tests to discriminate among these rival hypotheses have never been performed. We took the factors of visual complexity, inter-item similarity, specificity of identification, as well as others, into account in analyzing the visual recognition performance of two head-injured visual agnosic patients. In each case we found that recognition of living things was still disproportionately impaired when the effects of the other factors were accounted for.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2027434     DOI: 10.1016/0028-3932(91)90020-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  16 in total

1.  Perceptual and semantic sources of category-specific effects: event-related potentials during picture and word categorization.

Authors:  M Kiefer
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-01

2.  PET evidence for multiple strategies of categorization.

Authors:  A L Patalano; E E Smith; J Jonides; R A Koeppe
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Outline shape is a mediator of object recognition that is particularly important for living things.

Authors:  Toby J Lloyd-Jones; Linda Luckhurst
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-06

4.  Deficits in lexical and semantic processing: implications for models of normal language.

Authors:  J R Shelton; A Caramazza
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-03

5.  The bottle and the glass say to me: "pour!".

Authors:  Elisa De Stefani; Alessandro Innocenti; Nicolò Francesco Bernardi; Giovanna Cristina Campione; Maurizio Gentilucci
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Brain activation during semantic judgment of Chinese sentences: A functional MRI study.

Authors:  Lei Mo; Ho-Ling Liu; Hua Jin; Ya-Ling Yang
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Object representations in the temporal cortex of monkeys and humans as revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Andrew H Bell; Fadila Hadj-Bouziane; Jennifer B Frihauf; Roger B H Tootell; Leslie G Ungerleider
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Interhemispheric differences in knowledge of animals among patients with semantic dementia.

Authors:  Mario F Mendez; Sarah A Kremen; Po-Heng Tsai; Jill S Shapira
Journal:  Cogn Behav Neurol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.600

9.  Sources of error in picture naming under time pressure.

Authors:  Toby J Lloyd-Jones; Mandy Nettlemill
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-06

10.  Frontal contributions to face processing differences in autism: evidence from fMRI of inverted face processing.

Authors:  Susan Y Bookheimer; A Ting Wang; Ashley Scott; Marian Sigman; Mirella Dapretto
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.892

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.