Mario F Mendez1, Sarah A Kremen, Po-Heng Tsai, Jill S Shapira. 1. Departments of Neurology and Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, The University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA. mmendez@UCLA.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate interhemispheric differences on naming and fluency tasks for living versus nonliving things among patients with semantic dementia (SD). BACKGROUND: In SD, left-temporal involvement impairs language and word comprehension, and right-temporal involvement impairs facial recognition. There may be other interhemispheric differences, particularly in the animate-inanimate dichotomy. METHOD: On the basis of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) ratings of anterior temporal atrophy, 36 patients who met criteria for SD were divided into 21 with left-predominant and 11 with right-predominant involvement (4 others were too symmetric for analysis). The left and right-predominant groups were compared on naming, fluency, and facial recognition tests. RESULTS: Consistent with greater language impairment, the left-predominant patients had worse naming, especially inanimate and letter fluency, than the right-predominant patients. In contrast, difference in scores suggested selective impairment of animal naming, animal name fluency, and semantic knowledge for animate items among the right-predominant patients. Proportionally more right than left-predominant patients misnamed animal items and faces. CONCLUSIONS: These findings support interhemispheric differences in animal knowledge. Whereas left-predominant SD equally affects animate and inanimate words from language involvement, right-predominant SD, with greater sparing of language, continues to impair other semantic aspects of animals. The right anterior temporal region seems to make a unique contribution to knowledge of living things.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate interhemispheric differences on naming and fluency tasks for living versus nonliving things among patients with semantic dementia (SD). BACKGROUND: In SD, left-temporal involvement impairs language and word comprehension, and right-temporal involvement impairs facial recognition. There may be other interhemispheric differences, particularly in the animate-inanimate dichotomy. METHOD: On the basis of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) ratings of anterior temporal atrophy, 36 patients who met criteria for SD were divided into 21 with left-predominant and 11 with right-predominant involvement (4 others were too symmetric for analysis). The left and right-predominant groups were compared on naming, fluency, and facial recognition tests. RESULTS: Consistent with greater language impairment, the left-predominant patients had worse naming, especially inanimate and letter fluency, than the right-predominant patients. In contrast, difference in scores suggested selective impairment of animal naming, animal name fluency, and semantic knowledge for animate items among the right-predominant patients. Proportionally more right than left-predominant patients misnamed animal items and faces. CONCLUSIONS: These findings support interhemispheric differences in animal knowledge. Whereas left-predominant SD equally affects animate and inanimate words from language involvement, right-predominant SD, with greater sparing of language, continues to impair other semantic aspects of animals. The right anterior temporal region seems to make a unique contribution to knowledge of living things.
Authors: Sylvia S Fong; Pongsatorn Paholpak; Madelaine Daianu; Mariel B Deutsch; Brandalyn C Riedel; Andrew R Carr; Elvira E Jimenez; Michelle M Mather; Paul M Thompson; Mario F Mendez Journal: Cortex Date: 2017-04-08 Impact factor: 4.027
Authors: V Borghesani; G Battistella; M L Mandelli; A Welch; E Weis; K Younes; J Neuhaus; L T Grinberg; W M Seeley; S Spina; B Miller; Z Miller; M L Gorno-Tempini Journal: Neuroimage Clin Date: 2020-08-06 Impact factor: 4.881
Authors: Maxime Montembeault; Simona M Brambati; Maria Luisa Gorno-Tempini; Raffaella Migliaccio Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2018-08-21 Impact factor: 4.003