Literature DB >> 2026202

The effects of changing movement velocity and complexity on response preparation: evidence from latency, kinematic, and EMG measures.

P van Donkelaar1, I M Franks.   

Abstract

If movement control is afforded through the advance planning, or preprogramming, of upcoming actions, then one of the behavioral outcomes should be an increase in reaction time (RT) as the movement becomes more complex. In some situations, however, RT does not increase across levels of complexity, rather it remains invariant. In these cases, on-line preparation is typically inferred. That is, the sequence is said to be prepared in parts throughout the movement, as opposed to entirely beforehand. Given that there is some planning occurring during the sequence, then evidence of this process should be apparent within the movement itself. Three such dependent variables appear to provide such evidence. Specifically, the number of times the underlying accelerations cross the zero line within the movement, the number of 'significant deviations' within the acceleration trace, and the length of time for which the muscles are active (as measured by EMG) in relation to the duration of the movement. In the present experiment, then, these variables were measured in addition to the time required to prepare and initiate a movement performed under conditions conducive to either preprogramming or online preparation. Specifically, the movements were either completed as fast as possible, or at a considerably slower, more controlled speed. Each of the dependent variables displayed evidence of preprogramming in the movements completed at the fast velocity, and on-line preparation in the slower paced movements. Thus, in the slow condition, subjects appeared to rely more heavily on on-line prepared adjustments to produce an accurate outcome. The convergence attained between the various dependent measures lends power to the conclusions regarding hypothesized modes of control within the different speeds of movement.

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2026202     DOI: 10.1007/bf00229840

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  17 in total

1.  Memory drum theory: alternative tests and explanations for the complexity effects on simple reaction time.

Authors:  J G Anson
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 1.328

2.  Distributed planning of movement sequences.

Authors:  A Garcia-Colera; A Semjen
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 1.328

3.  Motor programming within a sequence of responses.

Authors:  S T Klapp; E Patrick Wyatt
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 1.328

4.  Optimality in human motor performance: ideal control of rapid aimed movements.

Authors:  D E Meyer; R A Abrams; S Kornblum; C E Wright; J E Smith
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Modification of trajectory of a pointing movement in response to a change in target location.

Authors:  J F Soechting; F Lacquaniti
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Processing visual feedback information for movement control.

Authors:  L G Carlton
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Electromechanical delay in skeletal muscle under normal movement conditions.

Authors:  R W Norman; P V Komi
Journal:  Acta Physiol Scand       Date:  1979-07

8.  Feedback control of hand-movement and Fitts' Law.

Authors:  E R Crossman; P J Goodeve
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1983-05

9.  Timing and torque involvement in the organisation of a rapid forearm flexion.

Authors:  D M Baba; R G Marteniuk
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1983-05

10.  Premotor and motor components of reaction time.

Authors:  J Botwinick; L W Thompson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1966-01
View more
  10 in total

1.  Can telling older adults where to look reduce falls? Evidence for a causal link between inappropriate visual sampling and suboptimal stepping performance.

Authors:  William R Young; Mark A Hollands
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-05-29       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Age-related differences in stepping performance during step cycle-related removal of vision.

Authors:  G J Chapman; M A Hollands
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-05-30       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The preparation and control of reversal movements as a single unit of action.

Authors:  Michael A Khan; Luc Tremblay; Darian T Cheng; Marlene Luis; Stuart J Mourton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Movement planning and attentional control of visuospatial working memory: evidence from a grasp-to-place task.

Authors:  M A Spiegel; D Koester; T Schack
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-07-06

5.  Pause time alters the preparation of two-component movements.

Authors:  Michael C Bajema; Colum D MacKinnon; Michael J Carter; Michael Kennefick; Sam Perlmutter; Anthony N Carlsen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  The organization of patterns of multilimb coordination as revealed through reaction time measures.

Authors:  S P Swinnen; D J Serrien; C B Walter; R Philippaerts
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Brain representations for acquiring and recalling visual-motor adaptations.

Authors:  Patrick Bédard; Jerome N Sanes
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-07-12       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  The increased foreperiod duration to attain the neutral optimal preparation from sitting to standing.

Authors:  Rémy Cuisinier; Isabelle Olivier; Vincent Nougier
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-01-31       Impact factor: 2.064

9.  Submovement control processes in discrete aiming as a function of space-time constraints.

Authors:  Tsung-Yu Hsieh; Yeou-Teh Liu; Karl M Newell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Effects of Future Information and Trajectory Complexity on Kinematic Signal and Muscle Activation during Visual-Motor Tracking.

Authors:  Linchuan Deng; Jie Luo; Yueling Lyu; Rong Song
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 2.524

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.