INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this review is to highlight the molecular mechanisms leading to the development and progression of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) with particular emphasis on tumor cell proliferation, local invasion, and metastasis. Recent advances in the field of PDAC biology have shed light on the molecular events that trigger PDAC initiation and maintenance. RESULTS: It is now clear that apart from the genetic alterations within the tumor cells, interactions of the tumor with its environment are necessary for proliferation and invasion. Interestingly, a number of developmental signaling pathways are reactivated in PDAC. Progress has also been made in the understanding of the molecular events that govern the process of metastasis. CONCLUSION: Although our understanding of the mechanisms underlying PDAC pathobiology are more advanced than ever, little progress has been made in the clinical treatment of PDAC, and successful bench-to-bedside transfer of knowledge to boost new treatment options is still unsatisfying.
INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this review is to highlight the molecular mechanisms leading to the development and progression of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) with particular emphasis on tumor cell proliferation, local invasion, and metastasis. Recent advances in the field of PDAC biology have shed light on the molecular events that trigger PDAC initiation and maintenance. RESULTS: It is now clear that apart from the genetic alterations within the tumor cells, interactions of the tumor with its environment are necessary for proliferation and invasion. Interestingly, a number of developmental signaling pathways are reactivated in PDAC. Progress has also been made in the understanding of the molecular events that govern the process of metastasis. CONCLUSION: Although our understanding of the mechanisms underlying PDAC pathobiology are more advanced than ever, little progress has been made in the clinical treatment of PDAC, and successful bench-to-bedside transfer of knowledge to boost new treatment options is still unsatisfying.
Authors: Andrew J Aguirre; Nabeel Bardeesy; Manisha Sinha; Lyle Lopez; David A Tuveson; James Horner; Mark S Redston; Ronald A DePinho Journal: Genes Dev Date: 2003-12-17 Impact factor: 11.361
Authors: Chenwei Li; David G Heidt; Piero Dalerba; Charles F Burant; Lanjing Zhang; Volkan Adsay; Max Wicha; Michael F Clarke; Diane M Simeone Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2007-02-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Kristopher R Koch; Chen-Ou Zhang; Piotr Kaczmarek; Joseph Barchi; Li Guo; Hanief M Shahjee; Susan Keay Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2011-09-20 Impact factor: 3.850
Authors: Giulia Grisendi; Rita Bussolari; Elena Veronesi; Serena Piccinno; Jorge S Burns; Giorgio De Santis; Pietro Loschi; Marco Pignatti; Fabrizio Di Benedetto; Roberto Ballarin; Carmela Di Gregorio; Valentina Guarneri; Lino Piccinini; Edwin M Horwitz; Paolo Paolucci; Pierfranco Conte; Massimo Dominici Journal: Am J Cancer Res Date: 2011-05-28 Impact factor: 6.166
Authors: Anne Nguyen Kovochich; Michael Arensman; Anna R Lay; Nagesh P Rao; Timothy Donahue; Xinmin Li; Samuel W French; David W Dawson Journal: Cancer Date: 2012-08-22 Impact factor: 6.860