Literature DB >> 10593418

Bone properties as estimated by mineral density, ultrasound attenuation, and velocity.

J Töyräs1, H Kröger, J S Jurvelin.   

Abstract

Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) analysis of bone has been suggested to have a level of performance equal to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) for the assessment of fracture risk. In this study, QUS and DXA measurements were conducted on bovine trabecular bone in vitro using commercially available clinical instruments. The samples were then mechanically tested to obtain Young's modulus and ultimate strength. In addition, QUS and DXA parameters of the human calcaneus (n = 34) were measured in vivo. The measurements revealed a significant effect of bovine bone size on broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) and speed of sound (SOS) in vitro. By normalizing the DXA and QUS results with bone thickness we could systematically improve their ability to predict bone strength. However, in bovine trabecular bone, BUA showed no significant linear correlation with either bone mineral density (BMD), Young's modulus, or ultimate strength. This finding may be typical of only high-density and low-porosity bovine bone. We significantly improved prediction of ultimate strength by combining density and ultrasound velocity results as compared with assessments of volumetric BMDvol (p < 0.05) or SOS (p < 0.001) alone. However, the improvement was not significant if BMDvol, instead of wet density, was used. Altogether, 88% of the variation in the ultimate strength of bovine bone could be explained by combined density and ultrasound velocity. In vivo, SOS showed a weak negative correlation with heel width (r = -1.350). The in vivo measurements also showed a close correlation for BUA with BMD in the human calcaneus. This suggests that BUA is more suitable for quantitative analysis of low-density trabecular bone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10593418     DOI: 10.1016/s8756-3282(99)00221-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  5 in total

1.  Quantitative ultrasound in relation to risk factors for low bone mineral density in South African pre-menopausal women.

Authors:  Deborah Constant; Lynn Rosenberg; Yuqing Zhang; Diane Cooper; Asgar A Kalla; Lisa Micklesfield; Margaret Hoffman
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 2.617

2.  Association of dietary and biochemical measures of vitamin K with quantitative ultrasound of the heel in men and women.

Authors:  R R McLean; S L Booth; D P Kiel; K E Broe; D R Gagnon; K L Tucker; L A Cupples; M T Hannan
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-01-06       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Large Scale Semi-Automated Labeling of Routine Free-Text Clinical Records for Deep Learning.

Authors:  Hari M Trivedi; Maryam Panahiazar; April Liang; Dmytro Lituiev; Peter Chang; Jae Ho Sohn; Yunn-Yi Chen; Benjamin L Franc; Bonnie Joe; Dexter Hadley
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 4.  Mechanisms of Interaction of Ultrasound With Cancellous Bone: A Review.

Authors:  Keith A Wear
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 2.725

Review 5.  Calcaneal quantitative ultrasound as a determinant of bone health status: what properties of bone does it reflect?

Authors:  Kok-Yong Chin; Soelaiman Ima-Nirwana
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 3.738

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.