Literature DB >> 19159147

Structured statistical models of inductive reasoning.

Charles Kemp1, Joshua B Tenenbaum.   

Abstract

Everyday inductive inferences are often guided by rich background knowledge. Formal models of induction should aim to incorporate this knowledge and should explain how different kinds of knowledge lead to the distinctive patterns of reasoning found in different inductive contexts. This article presents a Bayesian framework that attempts to meet both goals and describes [corrected] 4 applications of the framework: a taxonomic model, a spatial model, a threshold model, and a causal model. Each model makes probabilistic inferences about the extensions of novel properties, but the priors for the 4 models are defined over different kinds of structures that capture different relationships between the categories in a domain. The framework therefore shows how statistical inference can operate over structured background knowledge, and the authors argue that this interaction between structure and statistics is critical for explaining the power and flexibility of human reasoning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19159147     DOI: 10.1037/a0014282

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Rev        ISSN: 0033-295X            Impact factor:   8.934


  39 in total

1.  What is typical about the typicality effect in category-based induction?

Authors:  Jonathan R Rein; Micah B Goldwater; Arthur B Markman
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-04

2.  Broadening the study of inductive reasoning: confirmation judgments with uncertain evidence.

Authors:  Tommaso Mastropasqua; Vincenzo Crupi; Katya Tentori
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-10

3.  Raising argument strength using negative evidence: a constraint on models of induction.

Authors:  Daniel Heussen; Wouter Voorspoels; Steven Verheyen; Gert Storms; James A Hampton
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-11

4.  How similar are recognition memory and inductive reasoning?

Authors:  Brett K Hayes; Evan Heit
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-07

5.  Category vs. Object Knowledge in Category-based Induction.

Authors:  Gregory L Murphy; Brian H Ross
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 3.059

6.  Letting structure emerge: connectionist and dynamical systems approaches to cognition.

Authors:  James L McClelland; Matthew M Botvinick; David C Noelle; David C Plaut; Timothy T Rogers; Mark S Seidenberg; Linda B Smith
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2010-07-02       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  Occam's Razor in sensorimotor learning.

Authors:  Tim Genewein; Daniel A Braun
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Bayesian learning and the psychology of rule induction.

Authors:  Ansgar D Endress
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2013-03-01

9.  Structure learning in a sensorimotor association task.

Authors:  Daniel A Braun; Stephan Waldert; Ad Aertsen; Daniel M Wolpert; Carsten Mehring
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Structure learning in action.

Authors:  Daniel A Braun; Carsten Mehring; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2009-08-29       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.