Literature DB >> 27576681

Feeding Tube Utilization in Patients with Salivary Gland Malignancies.

Diane Wenhua Chen1, Jan S Lewin2, Li Xu2, Stephen Y Lai2, G Brandon Gunn3, Clifton David Fuller3, Abdallah S R Mohamed3,4, Aasheesh Kanwar3, Erich M Sturgis2,5, Katherine A Hutcheson2.   

Abstract

Objectives To evaluate feeding tube utilization in patients with salivary gland malignancies (SGMs). Study Design Case series with planned data collection. Setting The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA. Subjects and Methods Patients (N = 287) were sampled from an epidemiologic SGM registry during a 12-year period. Feeding tube history was retrospectively reviewed. Patients with outside locoregional therapy or palliative treatment were excluded. Enteral feeding and length of dependence were analyzed as a function treatment modality and site of SGM. Results Of 287 patients, 79 (28%) required temporary nasogastric tube feeding (median duration: 13 days, interquartile range: 6-21). Among those 79, 30 (10% of total cohort) required conversion to percutaneous gastrostomy tube (G-tube). Median G-tube duration was 4.8 months (interquartile range: 3.7-13.1). G-tube placement was necessary only in patients receiving multimodality therapy ( P < .001), and among those, 50% with SGMs arising from pharyngeal/laryngeal sites required G-tube, as compared with 8% to 19% of SGMs arising from all other sites ( P < .01). At a median follow-up of 2.4 years, 9 (3%) of all SGM patients were G-tube dependent, but 14% (3 of 22) with laryngeal/pharyngeal sites treated with multimodality therapy remained chronically G-tube dependent. Conclusion While almost 30% of SGM survivors require a temporary nasogastric tube, G-tube utilization is uncommon, in roughly 10% of SGM overall. G-tube utilization appears exclusive to patients treated with multimodality therapy, and chronic gastrostomy remains high (14%) in patients with minor gland cancers arising in the pharynx/larynx, suggesting impetus for dysphagia prophylaxis in these higher-risk subsets, similar to patients treated for squamous cancers.

Entities:  

Keywords:  feeding tube; gastrostomy tube; salivary gland malignancy

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27576681      PMCID: PMC5209253          DOI: 10.1177/0194599816666038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  36 in total

1.  Salivary gland tumors treated with adjuvant intensity-modulated radiotherapy with or without concurrent chemotherapy.

Authors:  Jonathan D Schoenfeld; David J Sher; Charles M Norris; Robert I Haddad; Marshall R Posner; Tracy A Balboni; Roy B Tishler
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-11-13       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Swallowing after major surgery of the oral cavity or oropharynx: a prospective and longitudinal assessment of patients treated by microvascular soft tissue reconstruction.

Authors:  Pepijn A Borggreven; Irma Verdonck-de Leeuw; Rico N Rinkel; Johannes A Langendijk; Jan C Roos; Eric F L David; Remco de Bree; C René Leemans
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.147

3.  Prognostic factors in adenocarcinoma of the salivary glands.

Authors:  Andrew T Huang; Chad Tang; Diana Bell; Murat Yener; Luis Izquierdo; Steven J Frank; Adel K El-Naggar; Ehab Y Hanna; Randal S Weber; Michael E Kupferman
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 5.337

4.  Development of a multivariable normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) model for tube feeding dependence after curative radiotherapy/chemo-radiotherapy in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Kim Wopken; Hendrik P Bijl; Arjen van der Schaaf; Hans Paul van der Laan; Olga Chouvalova; Roel J H M Steenbakkers; Patricia Doornaert; Ben J Slotman; Sjoukje F Oosting; Miranda E M C Christianen; Bernard F A M van der Laan; Jan L N Roodenburg; C René Leemans; Irma M Verdonck-de Leeuw; Johannes A Langendijk
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 6.280

5.  Chemo-IMRT of oropharyngeal cancer aiming to reduce dysphagia: swallowing organs late complication probabilities and dosimetric correlates.

Authors:  Avraham Eisbruch; Hyungjin M Kim; Felix Y Feng; Teresa H Lyden; Marc J Haxer; Mary Feng; Frank P Worden; Carol R Bradford; Mark E Prince; Jeffrey S Moyer; Gregory T Wolf; Douglas B Chepeha; Randall K Ten Haken
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Gastrostomy tube placement in patients with hypopharyngeal cancer treated with radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy: factors affecting placement and dependence.

Authors:  Mihir K Bhayani; Katherine A Hutcheson; Denise A Barringer; Dianna B Roberts; Jan S Lewin; Stephen Y Lai
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 3.147

7.  Swallowing outcomes after radiotherapy for laryngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Katherine A Hutcheson; Denise A Barringer; David I Rosenthal; Annette H May; Dianna B Roberts; Jan S Lewin
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2008-02

8.  Speech and swallowing function after oral and oropharyngeal resections: one-year follow-up.

Authors:  B R Pauloski; J A Logemann; A W Rademaker; F M McConnel; D Stein; Q Beery; J Johnson; M A Heiser; S Cardinale; D Shedd
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  1994 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.147

9.  Functional results of primary closure vs flaps in oropharyngeal reconstruction: a prospective study of speech and swallowing.

Authors:  F M McConnel; B R Pauloski; J A Logemann; A W Rademaker; L Colangelo; D Shedd; W Carroll; J Lewin; J Johnson
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1998-06

Review 10.  Enteral feeding tubes in patients undergoing definitive chemoradiation therapy for head-and-neck cancer: a critical review.

Authors:  Shlomo A Koyfman; David J Adelstein
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 7.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.