Literature DB >> 20230352

Invited editorial presents an accurate summary of the results of two randomised placebo-controlled trials of vertebroplasty.

Rachelle Buchbinder1, Richard H Osborne, David Kallmes.   

Abstract

Our recent editorial in the Journal presents an accurate summary of our two randomised trials of vertebroplasty, which found no benefit of vertebroplasty over placebo. Participants in both trials are representative of patients seen in clinical practice and who would qualify for government-subsidised funding of vertebroplasty in Australia. Clinical experience and previous published literature are likely to have overestimated the treatment benefit of vertebroplasty for many reasons. This is why randomised placebo-controlled trials are required to determine the efficacy of treatment interventions, particularly when the condition being treated is self-limiting and the primary end point is improvement of symptoms. Based on the best evidence currently available, the routine use of vertebroplasty outside of the research setting for painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures appears unjustified.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20230352      PMCID: PMC3935517          DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2010.tb03534.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Aust        ISSN: 0025-729X            Impact factor:   7.738


  16 in total

1.  ACP Journal Club. Vertebroplasty was not effective for painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures.

Authors:  Timothy S Carey
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Vertebroplasty appears no better than placebo for painful osteoporotic spinal fractures, and has potential to cause harm.

Authors:  Rachelle Buchbinder; Richard H Osborne; David Kallmes
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2009-11-02       Impact factor: 7.738

3.  Evaluation of vertebroplasty with a validated outcome measure: the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire.

Authors:  Andrew T Trout; David F Kallmes; Leigh A Gray; Barbara A Goodnature; Sandra L Everson; Bryan A Comstock; Jeffrey G Jarvik
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Vertebroplasty: when randomized placebo-controlled trial results clash with common belief.

Authors:  Rachelle Buchbinder; David F Kallmes
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.166

5.  Vertebroplasty for osteoporotic fracture? Think twice.

Authors:  Scott Kinkade; James J Stevermer
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 0.493

6.  A randomized trial of vertebroplasty for osteoporotic spinal fractures.

Authors:  David F Kallmes; Bryan A Comstock; Patrick J Heagerty; Judith A Turner; David J Wilson; Terry H Diamond; Richard Edwards; Leigh A Gray; Lydia Stout; Sara Owen; William Hollingworth; Basavaraj Ghdoke; Deborah J Annesley-Williams; Stuart H Ralston; Jeffrey G Jarvik
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  A randomized trial of vertebroplasty for painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures.

Authors:  Rachelle Buchbinder; Richard H Osborne; Peter R Ebeling; John D Wark; Peter Mitchell; Chris Wriedt; Stephen Graves; Margaret P Staples; Bridie Murphy
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Percutaneous vertebroplasty compared to conservative treatment in patients with painful acute or subacute osteoporotic vertebral fractures: three-months follow-up in a clinical randomized study.

Authors:  Rikke Rousing; Mikkel O Andersen; Stig M Jespersen; Karsten Thomsen; Jens Lauritsen
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Clinical outcomes after acute osteoporotic vertebral fractures: a 2-year non-randomised trial comparing percutaneous vertebroplasty with conservative therapy.

Authors:  Terrence H Diamond; Carl Bryant; Lois Browne; William A Clark
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2006-02-06       Impact factor: 7.738

10.  Baseline pain and disability in the Investigational Vertebroplasty Efficacy and Safety Trial.

Authors:  D F Kallmes; B A Comstock; L A Gray; P J Heagerty; W Hollingworth; J A Turner; L Stout; J G Jarvik
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 3.825

View more
  6 in total

1.  Vertebroplasty and the placebo response.

Authors:  Franklin G Miller; David F Kallmes; Rachelle Buchbinder
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Launching Effectiveness Research to Guide Practice in Neurosurgery: A National Institute Neurological Disorders and Stroke Workshop Report.

Authors:  Patricia Walicke; Aviva Abosch; Anthony Asher; Fred G Barker; Zoher Ghogawala; Robert Harbaugh; Lara Jehi; John Kestle; Walter Koroshetz; Roderick Little; Donald Rubin; Alex Valadka; Stephen Wisniewski; E Antonio Chiocca
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 4.654

3.  Impact of sham-controlled vertebroplasty trials on referral patterns at two academic medical centers.

Authors:  Sara S Lindsey; David F Kallmes; Michael J Opatowsky; Elizabeth A Broyles; Kennith F Layton
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2013-04

4.  Continuing conservative care versus crossover to radiofrequency kyphoplasty: a comparative effectiveness study on the treatment of vertebral body fractures.

Authors:  Rahel Bornemann; Michael Hanna; Koroush Kabir; Hans Goost; Dieter C Wirtz; Robert Pflugmacher
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  The case of vertebroplasty trials: promoting a culture of evidence-based procedural medicine.

Authors:  Franklin G Miller; David F Kallmes
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Effectiveness of vertebroplasty using individual patient data from two randomised placebo controlled trials: meta-analysis.

Authors:  Margaret P Staples; David F Kallmes; Bryan A Comstock; Jeffrey G Jarvik; Richard H Osborne; Patrick J Heagerty; Rachelle Buchbinder
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-07-12
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.