Literature DB >> 19246522

Baseline pain and disability in the Investigational Vertebroplasty Efficacy and Safety Trial.

D F Kallmes1, B A Comstock, L A Gray, P J Heagerty, W Hollingworth, J A Turner, L Stout, J G Jarvik.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Multiple case series of vertebroplasty outcomes have been published, though no large, placebo controlled trial has yet been performed. Our aim was to report baseline characteristics for the Investigational Vertebroplasty Efficacy and Safety Trial (INVEST), a randomized blinded controlled study of vertebroplasty.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We compared baseline demographics, pain scores, and scores on the modified Roland-Morris Disability Scale (RMDS), a back pain-specific metric, between 2 groups. One group included subjects enrolled at the lead INVEST site (n = 27 to date). The second group consisted of eligible patients seen concurrently at the lead INVEST site, who declined enrollment (n = 70). Comparisons were made by using 2-sample t tests.
RESULTS: Mean ages were similar between groups, averaging approximately 74 years among study participants and 77 years among nonenrolled eligible patients (P = .17). Approximately 75% of subjects were female in both groups. RMDS scores of enrolled patients at the lead site (18.0 +/- 4.2) were not statistically different from those of eligible nonenrolled patients at the lead site (18.6 +/- 3.6, P = .49). Pain scores in the enrolled subjects were measured as "average intensity over the prior 24 hours" with mean scores of 7.6 +/- 2.1 among enrolled patients at the lead site. Pain scores in eligible nonenrolled patients were measured as "pain at rest," with mean score of 3.4 +/- 3.3, and "pain with activity," with mean score of 8.5 +/- 2.0.
CONCLUSIONS: Patient demographics among subjects enrolled in the INVEST are similar to those in a cohort of eligible nonenrolled patients. Back pain-specific disability was similar between subjects enrolled in the INVEST study and eligible nonenrolled patients at the lead site.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19246522      PMCID: PMC3923409          DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1519

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  16 in total

1.  Osteoporotic compression fractures: outcomes after single- versus multiple-level percutaneous vertebroplasty.

Authors:  Anand K Singh; Thomas K Pilgram; Louis A Gilula
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Percutaneous vertebroplasty: functional improvement in patients with osteoporotic compression fractures.

Authors:  Luis Alvarez; María Alcaraz; Antonio Pérez-Higueras; Juan J Granizo; Ignacio de Miguel; Roberto E Rossi; Diana Quiñones
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Prospective analysis of clinical outcomes after percutaneous vertebroplasty for painful osteoporotic vertebral body fractures.

Authors:  Huy M Do; Brian S Kim; Mary L Marcellus; Lisa Curtis; Michael P Marks
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Percutaneous vertebroplasty compared with optimal pain medication treatment: short-term clinical outcome of patients with subacute or chronic painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. The VERTOS study.

Authors:  M H J Voormolen; W P T M Mali; P N M Lohle; H Fransen; L E H Lampmann; Y van der Graaf; J R Juttmann; X Jansssens; H J J Verhaar
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Kyphosis reduction and the rate of cement leaks after vertebroplasty of intravertebral clefts.

Authors:  Martin Krauss; Horst Hirschfelder; Bernd Tomandl; Gabriele Lichti; Ingrid Bär
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-11-29       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic compression fractures: quantitative prospective evaluation of long-term outcomes.

Authors:  Gregg H Zoarski; Paige Snow; Wayne J Olan; M J Bernadette Stallmeyer; Bradley W Dick; J Richard Hebel; Marian De Deyne
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.464

7.  Percutaneous vertebroplasty: the follow-up.

Authors:  S Barbero; I Casorzo; M Durando; G Mattone; C Tappero; C Venturi; G Gandini
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2008-02-25       Impact factor: 3.469

8.  Vertebroplasty, first 1000 levels of a single center: evaluation of the outcomes and complications.

Authors:  K F Layton; K R Thielen; C A Koch; P H Luetmer; J I Lane; J T Wald; D F Kallmes
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.825

9.  Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference for pain and disability instruments in low back pain patients.

Authors:  Henrik H Lauridsen; Jan Hartvigsen; Claus Manniche; Lars Korsholm; Niels Grunnet-Nilsson
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2006-10-25       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  INvestigational Vertebroplasty Efficacy and Safety Trial (INVEST): a randomized controlled trial of percutaneous vertebroplasty.

Authors:  Leigh A Gray; Jeffrey G Jarvik; Patrick J Heagerty; William Hollingworth; Lydia Stout; Bryan A Comstock; Judith A Turner; David F Kallmes
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2007-12-20       Impact factor: 2.362

View more
  7 in total

1.  Asymptomatic and unrecognized cement pulmonary embolism commonly occurs with vertebroplasty.

Authors:  M T Luetmer; B J Bartholmai; A E Rad; D F Kallmes
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 2.  Invited editorial presents an accurate summary of the results of two randomised placebo-controlled trials of vertebroplasty.

Authors:  Rachelle Buchbinder; Richard H Osborne; David Kallmes
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 7.738

3.  Comparative study of percutaneous vertebral body perforation and vertebroplasty for the treatment of painful vertebral compression fractures.

Authors:  K Yokoyama; M Kawanishi; M Yamada; H Tanaka; Y Ito; M Hirano; T Kuroiwa
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Efficacy of labral repair, biceps tenodesis, and diagnostic arthroscopy for SLAP lesions of the shoulder: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Oystein Skare; Cecilie Piene Schrøder; Olav Reikerås; Petter Mowinckel; Jens Ivar Brox
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture.

Authors:  Rachelle Buchbinder; Renea V Johnston; Kobi J Rischin; Joanne Homik; C Allyson Jones; Kamran Golmohammadi; David F Kallmes
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-11-06

Review 6.  Network meta-analysis of percutaneous vertebroplasty, percutaneous kyphoplasty, nerve block, and conservative treatment for nonsurgery options of acute/subacute and chronic osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) in short-term and long-term effects.

Authors:  Xiao-Hua Zuo; Xue-Piao Zhu; Hong-Guang Bao; Chen-Jie Xu; Hao Chen; Xian-Zhong Gao; Qian-Xi Zhang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 7.  Percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture.

Authors:  Rachelle Buchbinder; Renea V Johnston; Kobi J Rischin; Joanne Homik; C Allyson Jones; Kamran Golmohammadi; David F Kallmes
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-04-04
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.