Literature DB >> 20229105

The comparison of heavyweight mesh and lightweight mesh in an incisional animal model.

M A T Muftuoglu1, O Gungor, M Odabasi, O Ekinci, A Teyyareci, U Sekmen, A Saglam.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: An incisional hernia may occur through the incision area following a surgical operation, through the trocar opening and even through drainage exit points. Various synthetic surgical meshes have recently been used for the surgical repair of incisional hernias. In this study, we analysed the burst strength forces of heavyweight mesh and lightweight mesh in an incisional animal model.
METHODS: Following experimental formation of incisional hernias in 32 Wistar albino rats, they were divided into four groups. Polypropylene suture was used for closure of the abdominal incision in Group 1. In Groups 2, 3 and 4, polyester, polypropylene + polyglactin and polypropylene meshes, respectively, were fixed on the surface of the fascia after closing the defects in the rats. Polypropylene and polyester meshes are classified as heavy mesh. Light mesh is composed of a non-absorbable part (polypropylene) and an absorbable part (polyglactin), which will disappear 80 days after implantation. The rats were sacrificed at the end of the experiment. The pullout force of the fascia and meshes were recorded by use of a digital tension meter.
RESULTS: The mean pullout forces for Groups 1, 2, 3 and 4 were found to be 123.4 +/- 13.3, 292.33 +/- 17.4, 281.66 +/- 16.3 and 310.60 +/- 26.1 N, respectively.
CONCLUSION: At the end of the experiment, the polypropylene (25 g/cm(2)) present in the lightweight mesh was found to lose only a small percentage of the burst strength compared to the polypropylene (85 g/cm(2)) present in the heavyweight mesh.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20229105     DOI: 10.1007/s10029-010-0647-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hernia        ISSN: 1248-9204            Impact factor:   4.739


  14 in total

1.  A comparison of suture repair with mesh repair for incisional hernia.

Authors:  R W Luijendijk; W C Hop; M P van den Tol; D C de Lange; M M Braaksma; J N IJzermans; R U Boelhouwer; B C de Vries; M K Salu; J C Wereldsma; C M Bruijninckx; J Jeekel
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-08-10       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Vypro II mesh in hernia repair: impact of polyglactin on long-term incorporation in rats.

Authors:  R Rosch; K Junge; R Quester; U Klinge; B Klosterhalfen; V Schumpelick
Journal:  Eur Surg Res       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.745

3.  Experimental comparison of monofile light and heavy polypropylene meshes: less weight does not mean less biological response.

Authors:  Dirk Weyhe; Inge Schmitz; Orlin Belyaev; Robert Grabs; Klaus-Michael Müller; Waldemar Uhl; Volker Zumtobel
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 4.  Laparoscopic repair of ventral incisional hernias: pros and cons.

Authors:  Patricia L Turner; Adrian E Park
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.741

5.  Randomized clinical trial comparing lightweight composite mesh with polyester or polypropylene mesh for incisional hernia repair.

Authors:  J Conze; A N Kingsnorth; J B Flament; R Simmermacher; G Arlt; C Langer; E Schippers; M Hartley; V Schumpelick
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  The influence of differing pore sizes on the biocompatibility of two polypropylene meshes in the repair of abdominal defects. Experimental study in dogs.

Authors:  F H Greca; J B de Paula; M L Biondo-Simões; F D da Costa; A P da Silva; S Time; A Mansur
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.739

7.  Absorbable versus permanent mesh in abdominal operations.

Authors:  J Tyrell; H Silberman; P Chandrasoma; J Niland; J Shull
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1989-03

8.  Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of suture versus mesh repair of incisional hernia.

Authors:  Jacobus W A Burger; Roland W Luijendijk; Wim C J Hop; Jens A Halm; Emiel G G Verdaasdonk; Johannes Jeekel
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Mesh repair for postoperative wound dehiscence in the presence of infection: is absorbable mesh safer than non-absorbable mesh?

Authors:  M van't Riet; P J de Vos van Steenwijk; H J Bonjer; E W Steyerberg; J Jeekel
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2007-06-06       Impact factor: 4.739

10.  Postimplant behavior of lightweight polypropylene meshes in an experimental model of abdominal hernia.

Authors:  Juan M Bellon; Marta Rodriguez; Natalio Garcia-Honduvilla; Veronica Gomez-Gil; Gemma Pascual; Julia Bujan
Journal:  J Invest Surg       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.533

View more
  1 in total

1.  Mesh implants: An overview of crucial mesh parameters.

Authors:  Lei-Ming Zhu; Philipp Schuster; Uwe Klinge
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-10-27
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.