Literature DB >> 20228894

SPATS: Speech Perception Assessment and Training System.

James D Miller1, Charles S Watson, Diane Kewley-Port, Roy Sillings, William B Mills, Deborah F Burleson.   

Abstract

A software system, SPATS (patent pending), that tests and trains important bottom-up and combined bottom-up/top-down speech-perception skills is described. Bottom-up skills are the abilities to identify the constituents of syllables: onsets, nuclei, and codas in quiet and noise as produced by eight talkers. Top-down skills are the abilities to use knowledge of linguistic context to identify words in spoken sentences. The sentence module in SPATS emphasizes combined bottom-up/top-down abilities in perceiving sentences in noise. The word-initial onsets, stressed nuclei, and word-final codas are ranked in importance and grouped into subsets based on their importance. Testing utilizes random presentation of all the items included in a subset. Training in Quiet (SNR = 40 dB) or in Noise (SNR = 5 dB), is adaptively focused on individual listener's learnable items of intermediate difficulty. Alternatively, SNR-adaption training uses Kaernbach's algorithm to find the SNR required for a target percent correct. The unique sentence module trains the combination of bottom-up (hearing) with top-down (use of linguistic context) abilities to identify words in meaningful sentences in noise. Scoring in the sentence module is objective and automatic.

Year:  2007        PMID: 20228894      PMCID: PMC2836863          DOI: 10.1121/1.2942927

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  9 in total

1.  Simple adaptive testing with the weighted up-down method.

Authors:  C Kaernbach
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-03

Review 2.  Efficacy of individual auditory training in adults: a systematic review of the evidence.

Authors:  Robert Sweetow; Catherine V Palmer
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.664

3.  Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Matthew H Burk; Larry E Humes; Nathan E Amos; Lauren E Strauser
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  The need for and development of an adaptive Listening and Communication Enhancement (LACE) Program.

Authors:  Robert W Sweetow; Jennifer Henderson Sabes
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.664

5.  Effects of training on speech recognition performance in noise using lexically hard words.

Authors:  Matthew H Burk; Larry E Humes
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 6.  Perceptual learning and auditory training in cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Qian-Jie Fu; John J Galvin
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2007-09

7.  Effects of long-term training on aided speech-recognition performance in noise in older adults.

Authors:  Matthew H Burk; Larry E Humes
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Perceptual training improves syllable identification in new and experienced hearing aid users.

Authors:  G Christopher Stecker; Glen A Bowman; E William Yund; Timothy J Herron; Christina M Roup; David L Woods
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug

9.  Preliminary evaluation of the speech perception assessment and training system (SPATS) with hearing-aid and cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  James D Miller; Charles S Watson; Doris J Kistler; Frederic L Wightman; Jill E Preminger
Journal:  Proc Meet Acoust       Date:  2008-09-03
  9 in total
  8 in total

1.  Electrophysiologic Assessment of Auditory Training Benefits in Older Adults.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Kimberly Jenkins
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2015-11

2.  Options for Auditory Training for Adults with Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Anne D Olson
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2015-11

3.  Speech-perception training for older adults with hearing loss impacts word recognition and effort.

Authors:  Stefanie E Kuchinsky; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Stephanie L Cute; Larry E Humes; Judy R Dubno; Mark A Eckert
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2014-06-09       Impact factor: 4.016

4.  Training listeners to identify the sounds of speech: II. Using SPATS software.

Authors:  James D Miller; Charles S Watson; Doris J Kistler; Jill E Preminger; David J Wark
Journal:  Hear J       Date:  2008-10

5.  [Hearing training, hearing therapy and auditory rehabilitation in hearing impaired individuals during the last few centuries].

Authors:  M Ptok; S Meyer; A Ptok
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.284

6.  Training listeners to identify the sounds of speech: I. A review of past studies.

Authors:  Charles S Watson; James D Miller; Diane Kewley-Port; Larry E Humes; Frederic L Wightman
Journal:  Hear J       Date:  2008-09-01

7.  Preliminary evaluation of the speech perception assessment and training system (SPATS) with hearing-aid and cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  James D Miller; Charles S Watson; Doris J Kistler; Frederic L Wightman; Jill E Preminger
Journal:  Proc Meet Acoust       Date:  2008-09-03

Review 8.  Efficacy of individual computer-based auditory training for people with hearing loss: a systematic review of the evidence.

Authors:  Helen Henshaw; Melanie A Ferguson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.