Literature DB >> 20228878

Perception of initial obstruent voicing is influenced by gestural organization.

Catherine T Best1, Pierre A Hallé.   

Abstract

Cross-language differences in phonetic settings for phonological contrasts of stop voicing have posed a challenge for attempts to relate specific phonological features to specific phonetic details. We probe the phonetic-phonological relationship for voicing contrasts more broadly, analyzing in particular their relevance to nonnative speech perception, from two theoretical perspectives: feature geometry and articulatory phonology. Because these perspectives differ in assumptions about temporal/phasing relationships among features/gestures within syllable onsets, we undertook a cross-language investigation on perception of obstruent (stop, fricative) voicing contrasts in three nonnative onsets that use a common set of features/gestures but with differing time-coupling. Listeners of English and French, which differ in their phonetic settings for word-initial stop voicing distinctions, were tested on perception of three onset types, all nonnative to both English and French, that differ in how initial obstruent voicing is coordinated with a lateral feature/gesture and additional obstruent features/gestures. The targets, listed from least complex to most complex onsets, were: a lateral fricative voicing distinction (Zulu /ɬ/-ɮ/), a laterally-released affricate voicing distinction (Tlingit /tɬ/-/dɮ/), and a coronal stop voicing distinction in stop+/l/ clusters (Hebrew /tl/-/dl/). English and French listeners' performance reflected the differences in their native languages' stop voicing distinctions, compatible with prior perceptual studies on singleton consonant onsets. However, both groups' abilities to perceive voicing as a separable parameter also varied systematically with the structure of the target onsets, supporting the notion that the gestural organization of syllable onsets systematically affects perception of initial voicing distinctions.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 20228878      PMCID: PMC2835318          DOI: 10.1016/j.wocn.2009.09.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phon        ISSN: 0095-4470


  14 in total

1.  Discrimination of non-native consonant contrasts varying in perceptual assimilation to the listener's native phonological system.

Authors:  C T Best; G W McRoberts; E Goodell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Relationship between N1 evoked potential morphology and the perception of voicing.

Authors:  A Sharma; C M Marsh; M F Dorman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Toward a model for lexical access based on acoustic landmarks and distinctive features.

Authors:  Kenneth N Stevens
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 4.  Articulatory phonology: an overview.

Authors:  C P Browman; L Goldstein
Journal:  Phonetica       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.759

5.  Dental-to-velar perceptual assimilation: a cross-linguistic study of the perception of dental stop+/l/ clusters.

Authors:  Pierre A Hallé; Catherine T Best
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Phonological mediation in visual masked priming: evidence from phonotactic repair.

Authors:  Pierre A Hallé; Alberto Dominguez; Fernando Cuetos; Juan Segui
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  The link between speech perception and production is phonological and abstract: evidence from the shadowing task.

Authors:  Holger Mitterer; Mirjam Ernestus
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2008-09-20

8.  Processing of illegal consonant clusters: a case of perceptual assimilation?

Authors:  P A Hallé; J Segui; U Frauenfelder; C Meunier
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Rapid access to speech gestures in perception: Evidence from choice and simple response time tasks.

Authors:  Carol A Fowler; Julie M Brown; Laura Sabadini; Jeffrey Weihing
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.059

10.  Perceptuomotor compatibility effects in speech.

Authors:  Bruno Galantucci; Carol A Fowler; Louis Goldstein
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.199

View more
  3 in total

1.  Perceptual assimilation and discrimination of non-native vowel contrasts.

Authors:  Michael D Tyler; Catherine T Best; Alice Faber; Andrea G Levitt
Journal:  Phonetica       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 1.759

2.  The role of abstraction in non-native speech perception.

Authors:  Bozena Pajak; Roger Levy
Journal:  J Phon       Date:  2014-09-01

3.  Differential Difficulties in Perception of Tashlhiyt Berber Consonant Quantity Contrasts by Native Tashlhiyt Listeners vs. Berber-Naïve French Listeners.

Authors:  Pierre A Hallé; Rachid Ridouane; Catherine T Best
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-03-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.