Literature DB >> 11144595

Relationship between N1 evoked potential morphology and the perception of voicing.

A Sharma1, C M Marsh, M F Dorman.   

Abstract

Auditory evoked potential (AEP) correlates of the neural representation of stimuli along a /ga/-/ka/ and a /ba/-/pa/ continuum were examined to determine whether the voice-onset time (VOT)-related change in the N1 onset response from a single to double-peaked component is a reliable indicator of the perception of voiced and voiceless sounds. Behavioral identification results from ten subjects revealed a mean category boundary at a VOT of 46 ms for the /ga/-/ka/ continuum and at a VOT of 27.5 ms for the /ba/-/pa/ continuum. In the same subjects, electrophysiologic recordings revealed that a single N1 component was seen for stimuli with VOTs of 30 ms and less, and two components (N1' and N1) were seen for stimuli with VOTs of 40 ms and more for both continua. That is, the change in N1 morphology (from single to double-peaked) coincided with the change in perception from voiced to voiceless for stimuli from the /ba/-/pa/ continuum, but not for stimuli from the /ga/-/ka/ continuum. The results of this study show that N1 morphology does not reliably predict phonetic identification of stimuli varying in VOT. These findings also suggest that the previously reported appearance of a "double-peak" onset response in aggregate recordings from the auditory cortex does not indicate a cortical correlate of the perception of voicelessness.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11144595     DOI: 10.1121/1.1320474

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  20 in total

1.  Discrimination of speech stimuli based on neuronal response phase patterns depends on acoustics but not comprehension.

Authors:  Mary F Howard; David Poeppel
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Effects of noise-induced hearing loss at young age on voice onset time and gap-in-noise representations in adult cat primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  Naotaka Aizawa; Jos J Eggermont
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2006-01-12

3.  Objective phonological and subjective perceptual characteristics of syllables modulate spatiotemporal patterns of superior temporal gyrus activity.

Authors:  Richard E Frye; Janet McGraw Fisher; Thomas Witzel; Seppo P Ahlfors; Paul Swank; Jacqueline Liederman; Eric Halgren
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-02-14       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 4.  Evidence against attentional state modulating scalp-recorded auditory brainstem steady-state responses.

Authors:  Leonard Varghese; Hari M Bharadwaj; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  Dynamic EEG analysis during language comprehension reveals interactive cascades between perceptual processing and sentential expectations.

Authors:  McCall E Sarrett; Bob McMurray; Efthymia C Kapnoula
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2020-10-18       Impact factor: 2.381

6.  Perception of initial obstruent voicing is influenced by gestural organization.

Authors:  Catherine T Best; Pierre A Hallé
Journal:  J Phon       Date:  2010-01-01

7.  Continuous perception and graded categorization: electrophysiological evidence for a linear relationship between the acoustic signal and perceptual encoding of speech.

Authors:  Joseph C Toscano; Bob McMurray; Joel Dennhardt; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2010-10-08

8.  Category labels induce boundary-dependent perceptual warping in learned speech categories.

Authors:  Kristen Swan; Emily Myers
Journal:  Second Lang Res       Date:  2013-10-01

9.  The representation of voice onset time in the cortical auditory evoked potentials of young children.

Authors:  Katrina Agung King; Julia Campbell; Anu Sharma; Kathryn Martin; Michael Dorman; Justin Langran
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 3.708

10.  The electrically evoked auditory change complex: preliminary results from nucleus cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Carolyn J Brown; Christine Etler; Shuman He; Sara O'Brien; Sheryl Erenberg; Jae-Ryong Kim; Aayesha N Dhuldhoya; Paul J Abbas
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.