Gerald Konrad1. 1. Family Medical Centre, 400 Tache, Winnipeg, Manitoba. gkonrad@sbgh.mb.ca
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether dietary restrictions enhance the specificity of guaiac-based fecal occult blood tests (FOBTs) when screening for colorectal cancer. DATA SOURCES: PubMed-MEDLINE, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Cochrane databases were searched. STUDY SELECTION: English-language case series, cohort studies, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and meta-analyses were selected. Studies that did not include dietary manipulation or the use of guaiac-based FOBTs available in North America were excluded. SYNTHESIS: Ten case series, 5 cohort studies, 4 RCTs, and 1 meta-analysis were critically appraised. All studies used Hemoccult, Hemoccult II, or Hemoccult SENSA tests. Data from case series involving challenge diets showed no increase in positive FOBT results from high-peroxidase vegetables, but results varied with red-meat challenges depending on the amount of meat consumed and the test used. Case series, cohort studies, and RCTs comparing FOBT results during restricted versus unrestricted diets consistently showed no differences in positive FOBT results. CONCLUSION: Most of the evidence evaluating the effect of dietary restrictions on FOBT results is dated and of suboptimal quality. However, 4 RCTs and a meta-analysis of these data do not support dietary restrictions when screening for colorectal cancer. Because patient adherence can be an issue with FOBTs, and dietary restrictions can affect adherence in some populations, it is reasonable to abandon these recommendations without fear of substantially affecting specificity.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether dietary restrictions enhance the specificity of guaiac-based fecal occult blood tests (FOBTs) when screening for colorectal cancer. DATA SOURCES: PubMed-MEDLINE, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Cochrane databases were searched. STUDY SELECTION: English-language case series, cohort studies, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and meta-analyses were selected. Studies that did not include dietary manipulation or the use of guaiac-based FOBTs available in North America were excluded. SYNTHESIS: Ten case series, 5 cohort studies, 4 RCTs, and 1 meta-analysis were critically appraised. All studies used Hemoccult, Hemoccult II, or Hemoccult SENSA tests. Data from case series involving challenge diets showed no increase in positive FOBT results from high-peroxidase vegetables, but results varied with red-meat challenges depending on the amount of meat consumed and the test used. Case series, cohort studies, and RCTs comparing FOBT results during restricted versus unrestricted diets consistently showed no differences in positive FOBT results. CONCLUSION: Most of the evidence evaluating the effect of dietary restrictions on FOBT results is dated and of suboptimal quality. However, 4 RCTs and a meta-analysis of these data do not support dietary restrictions when screening for colorectal cancer. Because patient adherence can be an issue with FOBTs, and dietary restrictions can affect adherence in some populations, it is reasonable to abandon these recommendations without fear of substantially affecting specificity.
Authors: Stephen Ip; AbdulRazaq A H Sokoro; Lisa Kaita; Claudia Ruiz; Elaine McIntyre; Harminder Singh Journal: Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2014-10
Authors: Esmée J Grobbee; Pieter Ha Wisse; Eline H Schreuders; Aafke van Roon; Leonie van Dam; Ann G Zauber; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Wichor Bramer; Sarah Berhane; Jonathan J Deeks; Ewout W Steyerberg; Monique E van Leerdam; Manon Cw Spaander; Ernst J Kuipers Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2022-06-06
Authors: Jeremy P Brown; Kate Wooldrage; Suzanne Wright; Claire Nickerson; Amanda J Cross; Wendy S Atkin Journal: J Med Screen Date: 2017-05-03 Impact factor: 2.136