OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare the development of paraurethral banding and subsequent dyspareunia in women undergoing either a transobturator (TO) or retropubic (RP) sling. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective cohort study comparing women treated with either a TO or RP sling during a 10-month period. RESULTS: A total of 25 TO sling patients and 28 RP sling patients were compared in the study. Paraurethral banding was observed in 13/25 (52%) of the TO group compared with none in the RP group (P<.001). Although no difference was noted in overall female sexual function index scores, de novo internal dyspareunia was reported in 4/17 (24%) of the TO group and none in the RP group (P=.04). Paraurethral banding was observed in all patients reporting dyspareunia. CONCLUSION: We have identified paraurethral banding as a previously unreported complication of the TO sling. Surgeons should be aware of paraurethral banding and subsequent internal dyspareunia as a potential complication. Copyright (c) 2010 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare the development of paraurethral banding and subsequent dyspareunia in women undergoing either a transobturator (TO) or retropubic (RP) sling. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective cohort study comparing women treated with either a TO or RP sling during a 10-month period. RESULTS: A total of 25 TO sling patients and 28 RP sling patients were compared in the study. Paraurethral banding was observed in 13/25 (52%) of the TO group compared with none in the RP group (P<.001). Although no difference was noted in overall female sexual function index scores, de novo internal dyspareunia was reported in 4/17 (24%) of the TO group and none in the RP group (P=.04). Paraurethral banding was observed in all patients reporting dyspareunia. CONCLUSION: We have identified paraurethral banding as a previously unreported complication of the TO sling. Surgeons should be aware of paraurethral banding and subsequent internal dyspareunia as a potential complication. Copyright (c) 2010 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors: Jerry G Blaivas; Rajveer S Purohit; Matthew S Benedon; Gabriel Mekel; Michael Stern; Mubashir Billah; Kola Olugbade; Robert Bendavid; Vladimir Iakovlev Journal: Nat Rev Urol Date: 2015-08-18 Impact factor: 14.432