Eckhard Petri1, Kiran Ashok. 1. Division of Urogynecology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Greifswald, Ferdinand-Sauerbruch-Strasse, 17475 Greifswald, Germany. profpetri@gmx.de
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: To compare the late complication profiles between retropubic and transobturator slings used for stress urinary incontinence was the objective of the study. METHODS: Between the years 2003 and 2010, 338 complications of midurethral slings were surgically managed in a tertiary referral center. For the purpose of study, we excluded slings that had materials other than monofilament polypropylene, patients with previous anti-incontinence surgeries, and patients who were suspected of having a neurologic bladder condition. This is a prospective and retrospective study of the complications of midurethral slings. The characteristics of complications in retropubic and transobturator routes were compared and analyzed. RESULTS: Two hundred eighty cases with midurethral sling complications were suitable for analysis. Of these, retropubic slings constituted 210 and transobturator 70. The time interval between the insertion of tape and onset of complications was similar in both groups. Within the two groups, obstructive symptoms were seen more frequently in the retropubic tapes group. Compared to the retropubic tapes group, the transobturator group had more number of complications related to persistent pain (10% tension-free vaginal tapes vs. 32% transobturator tapes), dyspareunia (3% vs. 18%), and tape-related infections (4% vs. 18%). There were no significant differences among the complication rates pertaining to de novo overactive bladder (49% vs. 44%), obstructive symptoms (48% vs. 30%), and contraction of sling material (5% vs. 8%). CONCLUSIONS: Obstructive complications were seen more commonly in the retropubic tapes compared to the transobturator tapes. Transobturator tapes were more frequently associated with persistent pain, dyspareunia, and tape-related infections as compared to retropubic tapes.
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: To compare the late complication profiles between retropubic and transobturator slings used for stress urinary incontinence was the objective of the study. METHODS: Between the years 2003 and 2010, 338 complications of midurethral slings were surgically managed in a tertiary referral center. For the purpose of study, we excluded slings that had materials other than monofilament polypropylene, patients with previous anti-incontinence surgeries, and patients who were suspected of having a neurologic bladder condition. This is a prospective and retrospective study of the complications of midurethral slings. The characteristics of complications in retropubic and transobturator routes were compared and analyzed. RESULTS: Two hundred eighty cases with midurethral sling complications were suitable for analysis. Of these, retropubic slings constituted 210 and transobturator 70. The time interval between the insertion of tape and onset of complications was similar in both groups. Within the two groups, obstructive symptoms were seen more frequently in the retropubic tapes group. Compared to the retropubic tapes group, the transobturator group had more number of complications related to persistent pain (10% tension-free vaginal tapes vs. 32% transobturator tapes), dyspareunia (3% vs. 18%), and tape-related infections (4% vs. 18%). There were no significant differences among the complication rates pertaining to de novo overactive bladder (49% vs. 44%), obstructive symptoms (48% vs. 30%), and contraction of sling material (5% vs. 8%). CONCLUSIONS: Obstructive complications were seen more commonly in the retropubic tapes compared to the transobturator tapes. Transobturator tapes were more frequently associated with persistent pain, dyspareunia, and tape-related infections as compared to retropubic tapes.
Authors: Giacomo Novara; Walter Artibani; Matthew D Barber; Christopher R Chapple; Elisabetta Costantini; Vincenzo Ficarra; Paul Hilton; Carl G Nilsson; David Waltregny Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2010-04-23 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Sue Ross; Magali Robert; Cheryl Swaby; Lorel Dederer; Doug Lier; Selphee Tang; Penny Brasher; Colin Birch; Dave Cenaiko; Tom Mainprize; Magnus Murphy; Kevin Carlson; Richard Baverstock; Philip Jacobs; Tyler Williamson Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Jerry G Blaivas; Rajveer S Purohit; Matthew S Benedon; Gabriel Mekel; Michael Stern; Mubashir Billah; Kola Olugbade; Robert Bendavid; Vladimir Iakovlev Journal: Nat Rev Urol Date: 2015-08-18 Impact factor: 14.432
Authors: Claudia Cristina Palos; Ana P Maturana; Frederico R Ghersel; Cesar E Fernandes; Emerson Oliveira Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2017-10-02 Impact factor: 2.894