Literature DB >> 20226448

Reliability of automated volumetric measurement of multiple growing follicles in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation.

Frederic Lamazou1, Elisangela Arbo, Samuel Salama, Michaël Grynberg, René Frydman, Renato Fanchin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the reliability of a computer-assisted approach for automatically measuring ovarian follicles during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH).
DESIGN: Prospective, comparative study.
SETTING: Hospital Béclère, Clamart, France. PATIENT(S): Twenty-seven infertile IVF-ET candidates undergoing COH. INTERVENTION(S): Just before the oocyte retrieval, growing follicles (n=72) had their mean diameters measured and their volumes determined semimanually by virtual organ computer-aided analysis (VOCAL) and automatically by SonoAVC. Follicles were sorted in small (12-16 mm; n=35) and large (>16 mm; n=37) growing follicles. Measures were compared with the follicular fluid volume. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Concordance of results using intraclass correlation coefficient and limits of agreement methods, respectively. RESULT(S): Overall, VOCAL (median: 3.42 mL; range: 0.98-9.68 mL) and SonoAVC (3.25 mL; 0.98-8.63 mL) measurements were equivalent to the corresponding actual follicle volume (3.20 mL; 0.80-10.20 mL). The intraclass correlation coefficient values between follicular fluid volume and mean diameter, VOCAL, and SonoAVC were 0.51, 0.95, and 0.98, respectively, for small follicles, and 0.80, 0.93, and 0.92, respectively, for large follicles. 95% limits of agreement between actual volume and VOCAL (-1.09 to +1.07 mL) and SonoAVC (-1.08 to +0.84 mL) measurements were comparable in both groups. CONCLUSION(S): Automated measurement of multiple follicular volumes using SonoAVC is a simple technique, which reliability is superior to usual diameter measurements and comparable to VOCAL. This technologic refinement invites us to switch toward volumetric monitoring of follicle growth during COH.
Copyright © 2010 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20226448     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.01.062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  3 in total

Review 1.  A critical review of bi-dimensional and three-dimensional ultrasound techniques to monitor follicle growth: do they help improving IVF outcome?

Authors:  Alberto Revelli; Giorgia Martiny; Luisa Delle Piane; Chiara Benedetto; Paolo Rinaudo; Ilan Tur-Kaspa
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2014-11-24       Impact factor: 5.211

Review 2.  The Value of Automated Follicle Volume Measurements in IVF/ICSI.

Authors:  Frank Vandekerckhove; Victoria Bracke; Petra De Sutter
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2014-05-28

3.  Comparison of manual and automated measurements of monodominant follicle diameter with different follicle size in infertile patients.

Authors:  Ping Pan; Xiaoli Chen; Yu Li; Qingxue Zhang; Xiaomiao Zhao; Madafeitom M A Bodombossou-Djobo; Dongzi Yang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.