Literature DB >> 20223438

Consistent constructs in individuals' risk taking in decisions from experience.

Eyal Ert1, Eldad Yechiam.   

Abstract

The current research evaluates the consistency of different constructs affecting risk taking in individuals' experiential decisions across different levels of risk. Specifically, we contrast three major views concerning the psychological constructs that underlie risk taking behavior. The first is the classical economic approach which views risk as the sensitivity to differences in variance. The second is the latent-components approach suggesting the importance of sensitivity to losses and diminishing sensitivity to marginal increases in payoffs. The third approach, risk acceptance, relates to the willingness to accept probable outcomes over certainty. The results of three studies indicate that (1) Individuals do not exhibit consistency in their sensitivity to variance. (2) Consistent diminishing sensitivity is found within the gain and loss domains, but across these domains individuals seem to be consistent only when deciding between constant versus probable outcomes, suggesting that they reliably differ in their risk acceptance. (3) Risk acceptance appears to entail different psychological constructs when the decision problem involves co-occurring gains and losses. Copyright 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20223438     DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.02.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)        ISSN: 0001-6918


  7 in total

1.  Magnitude and incentives: revisiting the overweighting of extreme events in risky decisions from experience.

Authors:  Emmanouil Konstantinidis; Robert T Taylor; Ben R Newell
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-10

2.  Loss restlessness and gain calmness: durable effects of losses and gains on choice switching.

Authors:  Eldad Yechiam; Gal Zahavi; Eli Arditi
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-08

3.  Experience-based decisions and brain activity: three new gaps and partial answers.

Authors:  Eldad Yechiam; Itzhak Aharon
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-01-05

4.  To Take Risk is to Face Loss: A Tonic Pupillometry Study.

Authors:  Eldad Yechiam; Ariel Telpaz
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-11-22

5.  On the value of experience-based decisions in studying constructs of risk taking.

Authors:  Eyal Ert
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-01-25

6.  Patterns of choice adaptation in dynamic risky environments.

Authors:  Emmanouil Konstantinidis; Jason L Harman; Cleotilde Gonzalez
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2022-03-08

7.  Remembering the best and worst of times: memories for extreme outcomes bias risky decisions.

Authors:  Christopher R Madan; Elliot A Ludvig; Marcia L Spetch
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-06
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.