Literature DB >> 25348826

Loss restlessness and gain calmness: durable effects of losses and gains on choice switching.

Eldad Yechiam1, Gal Zahavi, Eli Arditi.   

Abstract

While the traditional conceptualization of the effect of losses focuses on bias in the subjective weight of losses compared with respective gains, some accounts suggest more global task-related effects of losses. Based on a recent attentional theory, we predicted a positive after-effect of losses on choice switching in later tasks. In two experimental studies, we found increased choice switching rates in tasks with losses compared to tasks with no losses. Additionally, this heightened shifting behavior was maintained in subsequent tasks that do not include losses, a phenomenon we refer to as "loss restlessness." Conversely, gains were found to have an opposite "calming" effect on choice switching. Surprisingly, the loss restlessness phenomenon was observed following an all-losses payoff regime but not after a task with symmetric mixed gains and losses. This suggests that the unresolved mental account following an all-losses regime increases search behavior. Potential implications to macro level phenomena, such as the leverage effect, are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25348826     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-014-0749-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  12 in total

Review 1.  An integrative theory of locus coeruleus-norepinephrine function: adaptive gain and optimal performance.

Authors:  Gary Aston-Jones; Jonathan D Cohen
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 12.449

2.  Dissociable but inter-related systems of cognitive control and reward during decision making: evidence from pupillometry and event-related fMRI.

Authors:  Theodore D Satterthwaite; Leonard Green; Joel Myerson; Jamie Parker; Mohana Ramaratnam; Randy L Buckner
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-05-24       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Functional dissociations of risk and reward processing in the medial prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Gui Xue; Zhonglin Lu; Irwin P Levin; Joshua A Weller; Xiangrui Li; Antoine Bechara
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2008-10-08       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Deciding advantageously before knowing the advantageous strategy.

Authors:  A Bechara; H Damasio; D Tranel; A R Damasio
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-02-28       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  When and why rare events are underweighted: a direct comparison of the sampling, partial feedback, full feedback and description choice paradigms.

Authors:  Adrian R Camilleri; Ben R Newell
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-04

6.  Consistent constructs in individuals' risk taking in decisions from experience.

Authors:  Eyal Ert; Eldad Yechiam
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2010-03-12

Review 7.  Losses as modulators of attention: review and analysis of the unique effects of losses over gains.

Authors:  Eldad Yechiam; Guy Hochman
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2012-07-23       Impact factor: 17.737

8.  How choice ecology influences search in decisions from experience.

Authors:  Tomás Lejarraga; Ralph Hertwig; Cleotilde Gonzalez
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2012-07-02

9.  Framing effects and risk-sensitive decision making.

Authors:  Sandeep Mishra; Margaux Gregson; Martin L Lalumière
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2011-06-15

Review 10.  The description-experience gap in risky choice.

Authors:  Ralph Hertwig; Ido Erev
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 20.229

View more
  6 in total

1.  To not settle for small losses: evidence for an ecological aspiration level of zero in dynamic decision-making.

Authors:  Bo Pang; Nathaniel J Blanco; W Todd Maddox; Darrell A Worthy
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-04

2.  Assessing behavioural profiles following neutral, positive and negative feedback.

Authors:  Rimsa Dahal; Kelsey MacLellan; Danielle Vavrek; Benjamin James Dyson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  Association between Stock Market Gains and Losses and Google Searches.

Authors:  Eli Arditi; Eldad Yechiam; Gal Zahavi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Boredom proneness is associated with noisy decision-making, not risk-taking.

Authors:  Ofir Yakobi; James Danckert
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 2.064

5.  Variability in competitive decision-making speed and quality against exploiting and exploitative opponents.

Authors:  Benjamin James Dyson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  How the threat of losses makes people explore more than the promise of gains.

Authors:  Tomás Lejarraga; Ralph Hertwig
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-06
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.