OBJECTIVES: Detection rates of gastric cancer in F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET depend on the histopathological characteristics of the primary tumor. To clarify this observation, FDG uptake in gastric carcinoma was analyzed by focusing on histopathology and on the expression of the glucose transporter (GLUT-1) in the primary tumor. METHODS: Thirty-five patients with the diagnosis of gastric cancer underwent FDG-PET with visual image analysis and measurement of maximum standardized uptake value (SUV(max)) before surgical treatment. Resected tumor samples were categorized according to Union internationale contre le cancer, WHO, and Laurén classification and tumor differentiation. GLUT-1 expression was graded semiquantitatively by immunohistochemistry. Statistical analysis was done for the correlation of histology, different classifications, and tumor grading with SUV(max) and GLUT-1 expression. RESULTS: SUV(max) significantly correlated with histopathological classifications according to the WHO (P=0.009) and Laurén classification (P=0.034). Signet-ring cell carcinoma had a median SUV(max) of only 3.0 (range, 1.0-11.5). Median SUV(max) for papillary and tubular carcinoma was 7.8 (range, 1.8-14.4). In 21 (60%) cases, GLUT-1 expression in the primary tumor was positive. GLUT-1 expression correlated significantly with tumor differentiation (P=0.018) and the classification according to Laurén (P=0.023) and WHO (P<0.001). Thirteen (76%) of 17 signet-ring cell carcinoma cases did not show any GLUT-1 expression. SUV(max) in relation to GLUT-1 expression showed a significant correlation (P=0.002). For cases with detectable GLUT-1 expression the median SUV(max) was 6.9 (range, 2.3-14.1) versus a median of 3.1 (range, 1-8.8) for cases without GLUT-1 expression. CONCLUSION: FDG uptake in gastric cancer depends on GLUT-1 expression. One major reason for low FDG uptake in signet-ring cell carcinoma is the low GLUT-1 expression in this histological subtype of gastric cancer.
OBJECTIVES: Detection rates of gastric cancer in F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET depend on the histopathological characteristics of the primary tumor. To clarify this observation, FDG uptake in gastric carcinoma was analyzed by focusing on histopathology and on the expression of the glucose transporter (GLUT-1) in the primary tumor. METHODS: Thirty-five patients with the diagnosis of gastric cancer underwent FDG-PET with visual image analysis and measurement of maximum standardized uptake value (SUV(max)) before surgical treatment. Resected tumor samples were categorized according to Union internationale contre le cancer, WHO, and Laurén classification and tumor differentiation. GLUT-1 expression was graded semiquantitatively by immunohistochemistry. Statistical analysis was done for the correlation of histology, different classifications, and tumor grading with SUV(max) and GLUT-1 expression. RESULTS: SUV(max) significantly correlated with histopathological classifications according to the WHO (P=0.009) and Laurén classification (P=0.034). Signet-ring cell carcinoma had a median SUV(max) of only 3.0 (range, 1.0-11.5). Median SUV(max) for papillary and tubular carcinoma was 7.8 (range, 1.8-14.4). In 21 (60%) cases, GLUT-1 expression in the primary tumor was positive. GLUT-1 expression correlated significantly with tumor differentiation (P=0.018) and the classification according to Laurén (P=0.023) and WHO (P<0.001). Thirteen (76%) of 17 signet-ring cell carcinoma cases did not show any GLUT-1 expression. SUV(max) in relation to GLUT-1 expression showed a significant correlation (P=0.002). For cases with detectable GLUT-1 expression the median SUV(max) was 6.9 (range, 2.3-14.1) versus a median of 3.1 (range, 1-8.8) for cases without GLUT-1 expression. CONCLUSION:FDG uptake in gastric cancer depends on GLUT-1 expression. One major reason for low FDG uptake in signet-ring cell carcinoma is the low GLUT-1 expression in this histological subtype of gastric cancer.
Authors: Nikolaos Charalampakis; Lianchun Xiao; Elena Elimova; Roopma Wadhwa; Hironori Shiozaki; Yusuke Shimodaira; Mariela A Blum; Venkatram Planjery; Jane E Rogers; Aurelio Matamoros; Tara Sagebiel; Prajnan Das; Jeffrey H Lee; Manoop S Bhutani; Brian Weston; Jeannelyn S Estrella; Brian D Badgwell; Jaffer A Ajani Journal: Oncology Date: 2015-09-23 Impact factor: 2.935
Authors: Hans Anton Schlößer; Uta Drebber; Alexander Urbanski; Simon Haase; Christoph Baltin; Felix Berlth; Susanne Neiß; Michael von Bergwelt-Baildon; Ulrich Klaus Fetzner; Ute Warnecke-Eberz; Elfriede Bollschweiler; Arnulf Heinrich Hölscher; Stefan Paul Mönig; Hakan Alakus Journal: Gastric Cancer Date: 2015-12-07 Impact factor: 7.370