Literature DB >> 24914328

Pathohistological classification systems in gastric cancer: diagnostic relevance and prognostic value.

Felix Berlth1, Elfriede Bollschweiler1, Uta Drebber1, Arnulf H Hoelscher1, Stefan Moenig1.   

Abstract

Several pathohistological classification systems exist for the diagnosis of gastric cancer. Many studies have investigated the correlation between the pathohistological characteristics in gastric cancer and patient characteristics, disease specific criteria and overall outcome. It is still controversial as to which classification system imparts the most reliable information, and therefore, the choice of system may vary in clinical routine. In addition to the most common classification systems, such as the Laurén and the World Health Organization (WHO) classifications, other authors have tried to characterize and classify gastric cancer based on the microscopic morphology and in reference to the clinical outcome of the patients. In more than 50 years of systematic classification of the pathohistological characteristics of gastric cancer, there is no sole classification system that is consistently used worldwide in diagnostics and research. However, several national guidelines for the treatment of gastric cancer refer to the Laurén or the WHO classifications regarding therapeutic decision-making, which underlines the importance of a reliable classification system for gastric cancer. The latest results from gastric cancer studies indicate that it might be useful to integrate DNA- and RNA-based features of gastric cancer into the classification systems to establish prognostic relevance. This article reviews the diagnostic relevance and the prognostic value of different pathohistological classification systems in gastric cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gastric cancer; Laurén; Pathohistology; World Health Organization classification; classification

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24914328      PMCID: PMC4024777          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i19.5679

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  50 in total

1.  Gastric carcinoma. A pathobiological classification.

Authors:  S C Ming
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 2.  Pathology and molecular biology of gastric cancer.

Authors:  Matti Vauhkonen; Hanna Vauhkonen; Pentti Sipponen
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.043

3.  Differences between biopsy- or specimen-related Laurén and World Health Organization classification in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Uta Flucke; Stefan P Mönig; Stephan E Baldus; Thomas K Zirbes; Elfriede Bollschweiler; Jürgen Thiele; Hans P Dienes; Arnulf H Hölscher
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2001-12-04       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Lack of prognostic significance in Goseki grading of gastric carcinoma.

Authors:  L Ventura; A Chiominto; S Discepoli; T Ventura; C Di Giacomo; P Leocata
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2002-06

Review 5.  Clinicopathological characteristics in the differential diagnosis of hepatoid adenocarcinoma: a literature review.

Authors:  Jiann-Sheng Su; Yu-Tso Chen; Ren-Ching Wang; Chun-Ying Wu; Shou-Wu Lee; Teng-Yu Lee
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Prognostic significance of Lauren and Ming classifications and other pathologic parameters in gastric carcinoma.

Authors:  M M Ribeiro; J A Sarmento; M A Sobrinho Simões; J Bastos
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1981-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  "Very well differentiated tubular adenocarcinoma" of the stomach: its endoscopic and histopathological characteristics.

Authors:  T Fujii; S Yoshida; K Abe; D Saito; H Yamaguchi; Y Oguro; K Maruyama; A Ochiai; T Hirota
Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 3.019

Review 8.  Pathology of upper gastrointestinal malignancies.

Authors:  Mario Sarbia; Karl Friedrich Becker; Heinz Höfler
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.929

9.  Histological grading in gastric cancer by Ming classification: correlation with histopathological subtypes, metastasis, and prognosis.

Authors:  Thomas Luebke; Stephan E Baldus; Guido Grass; Elfriede Bollschweiler; Jürgen Thiele; Hans-Peter Dienes; Arnulf H Hoelscher; Stefan P Moenig
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.282

10.  Clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic analysis of Lauren classification in gastric adenocarcinoma in China.

Authors:  Miao-zhen Qiu; Mu-yan Cai; Dong-sheng Zhang; Zhi-qiang Wang; De-shen Wang; Yu-hong Li; Rui-hua Xu
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 5.531

View more
  49 in total

1.  CT Perfusion evaluation of gastric cancer: correlation with histologic type.

Authors:  Dong Ho Lee; Se Hyung Kim; Ijin Joo; Joon Koo Han
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Prognostic value of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Zhi-De Hu; Yuan-Lan Huang; Bao-Dong Qin; Qing-Qin Tang; Min Yang; Ning Ma; Hai-Tao Fu; Ting-Ting Wei; Ren-Qian Zhong
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2015-03

Review 3.  Underlying Mechanisms for Distant Metastasis - Molecular Biology.

Authors:  Eva Pachmayr; Christoph Treese; Ulrike Stein
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2017-02-09

4.  Metastatic lymph node ratio and Lauren classification are independent prognostic markers for survival rates of patients with gastric cancer.

Authors:  Huan Wang; Xiao-Ming Xing; Lei-Na Ma; Lian Liu; Jing Hao; Ling-Xin Feng; Zhuang Yu
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 2.967

5.  Prognostic significance of serum alkaline phosphatase and lactate dehydrogenase levels in patients with unresectable advanced gastric cancer.

Authors:  Tsutomu Namikawa; Nobuko Ishida; Sachi Tsuda; Kazune Fujisawa; Eri Munekage; Jun Iwabu; Masaya Munekage; Sunao Uemura; Shigehiro Tsujii; Takahiko Tamura; Tomoaki Yatabe; Hiromichi Maeda; Hiroyuki Kitagawa; Michiya Kobayashi; Kazuhiro Hanazaki
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2018-11-11       Impact factor: 7.370

6.  Expression of secreted phospholipase A2-Group IIA correlates with prognosis of gastric adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Chengwei Zhang; Haipeng Yu; Haiyan Xu; Lanlan Yang
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 2.967

7.  Increased cyclin T1 expression as a favorable prognostic factor in treating gastric adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Jong-Shiaw Jin; Lien-Fu Lin; Jui-Chang Chen; Chia-Chi Huang; Jeng-Horng Sheu; Wenlung Chen; Tang-Yi Tsao; Chih-Wei Hsu
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 2.967

8.  Genetic differences stratified by PCR-based microsatellite analysis in gastric intramucosal neoplasia.

Authors:  Tamotsu Sugai; Ryo Sugimoto; Wataru Habano; Masaki Endoh; Makoto Eizuka; Koudai Tsuchida; Eiichiro Yamamoto; Keisuke Kawasaki; Syunichi Yanai; Takayuki Matsumoto; Hiromu Suzuki
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2016-05-28       Impact factor: 7.370

9.  Early gastric cancer with a mixed-type Lauren classification is more aggressive and exhibits greater lymph node metastasis.

Authors:  Jeung Hui Pyo; Hyuk Lee; Byung-Hoon Min; Jun Haeng Lee; Min Gew Choi; Jun Ho Lee; Tae Sung Sohn; Jae Moon Bae; Kyoung-Mee Kim; Seungmin Yeon; Sin-Ho Jung; Jae J Kim; Sung Kim
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 7.527

10.  Low scavenger receptor class B type I expression is associated with gastric adenocarcinoma tumor aggressiveness.

Authors:  Xingwen Wang; Changshun Wu; Baoying Yuan; Dan Wang; Huiling Liu; Hong Feng; Shui Sun
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 2.967

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.