Literature DB >> 20220069

Combining information regarding chromosomal aberrations t(4;14) and del(17p13) with the International Staging System classification allows stratification of myeloma patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation.

Kai Neben1, Anna Jauch, Uta Bertsch, Christiane Heiss, Thomas Hielscher, Anja Seckinger, Tina Mors, Nadine Zoe Müller, Jens Hillengass, Marc S Raab, Anthony D Ho, Dirk Hose, Hartmut Goldschmidt.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chromosomal abnormalities have been shown to play a major role in disease evolution of multiple myeloma. Specific changes in interphase cells can be detected by fluorescent in situ hybridization, which overcomes the problem of the lack of dividing cells required for conventional cytogenetics. DESIGN AND METHODS: We analyzed the prognostic value of 12 frequent chromosomal abnormalities detected by fluorescent in situ hybridization in a series of patients (n=315) with newly diagnosed, symptomatic multiple myeloma. All patients underwent frontline autologous stem cell transplantation according to the GMMG-HD3- or GMMG-HD4-trial protocols or analogous protocols.
RESULTS: Univariate statistical analyses revealed that the presence of del(13q14), del(17p13), t(4;14), +1q21 and non-hyperdiploidy was associated with adverse progression-free and overall survival rates independently of the International Staging System (ISS) classification. Multivariate analyses showed that only t(4;14) and del(17p13) retained prognostic value for both progression-free and overall survival. According to the presence or absence of t(4;14) and del(17p13) and the patients' International Staging System classification, the cohort could be stratified into three distinct groups: a group with a favorable prognosis [absence of t(4;14)/del(17p13) and ISS I], a group with a poor prognosis [presence of t(4;14)/del(17p13) and ISS II/III] and a group with an intermediate prognosis (all remaining patients). The probabilities of overall survival at 5 years decreased from 72% in the favorable prognostic group to 62% (hazard ratio 2.4; P=0.01) in the intermediate and 41% (hazard ratio 5.6; P<0.001) in the poor prognostic groups.
CONCLUSIONS: These results have implications for risk-adapted management for patients with multiple myeloma undergoing high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation and suggest that new treatment concepts are urgently needed for patients who belong to the poor prognosis group. As targeted therapies evolve, different treatment options might have variable success, depending on the underlying genetic nature of the clone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20220069      PMCID: PMC2895040          DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2009.016436

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Haematologica        ISSN: 0390-6078            Impact factor:   9.941


  28 in total

1.  Deletion of 13q14 remains an independent adverse prognostic variable in multiple myeloma despite its frequent detection by interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization.

Authors:  N Zojer; R Königsberg; J Ackermann; E Fritz; S Dallinger; E Krömer; H Kaufmann; L Riedl; H Gisslinger; S Schreiber; R Heinz; H Ludwig; H Huber; J Drach
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2000-03-15       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  Myeloma and the t(11;14)(q13;q32); evidence for a biologically defined unique subset of patients.

Authors:  Rafael Fonseca; Emily A Blood; Martin M Oken; Robert A Kyle; Gordon W Dewald; Richard J Bailey; Scott A Van Wier; Kimberly J Henderson; James D Hoyer; David Harrington; Neil E Kay; Brian Van Ness; Philip R Greipp
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2002-05-15       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  Ploidy, as detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization, defines different subgroups in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  S Wuilleme; N Robillard; L Lodé; F Magrangeas; H Beris; J-L Harousseau; J Proffitt; S Minvielle; H Avet-Loiseau
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 11.528

4.  Chromosome abnormalities clustering and its implications for pathogenesis and prognosis in myeloma.

Authors:  C S Debes-Marun; G W Dewald; S Bryant; E Picken; R Santana-Dávila; N González-Paz; J M Winkler; R A Kyle; M A Gertz; T E Witzig; A Dispenzieri; M Q Lacy; S V Rajkumar; J A Lust; P R Greipp; R Fonseca
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 11.528

5.  High-dose chemotherapy with hematopoietic stem-cell rescue for multiple myeloma.

Authors:  J Anthony Child; Gareth J Morgan; Faith E Davies; Roger G Owen; Susan E Bell; Kim Hawkins; Julia Brown; Mark T Drayson; Peter J Selby
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-05-08       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Recurrent 14q32 translocations determine the prognosis of multiple myeloma, especially in patients receiving intensive chemotherapy.

Authors:  Philippe Moreau; Thierry Facon; Xavier Leleu; Nadine Morineau; Pauline Huyghe; Jean-Luc Harousseau; Régis Bataille; Hervé Avet-Loiseau
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2002-09-01       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  Clinical and biologic implications of recurrent genomic aberrations in myeloma.

Authors:  Rafael Fonseca; Emily Blood; Montserrat Rue; David Harrington; Martin M Oken; Robert A Kyle; Gordon W Dewald; Brian Van Ness; Scott A Van Wier; Kimberly J Henderson; Richard J Bailey; Philip R Greipp
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2003-02-06       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  The t(4;14) is associated with poor prognosis in myeloma patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplant.

Authors:  Hong Chang; Stephen Sloan; Dan Li; Lihua Zhuang; Qi-Long Yi; Christine I Chen; Donna Reece; Kathy Chun; A Keith Stewart
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 6.998

9.  Single versus double autologous stem-cell transplantation for multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Michel Attal; Jean-Luc Harousseau; Thierry Facon; François Guilhot; Chantal Doyen; Jean-Gabriel Fuzibet; Mathieu Monconduit; Cyrille Hulin; Denis Caillot; Reda Bouabdallah; Laurent Voillat; Jean-Jacques Sotto; Bernard Grosbois; Regis Bataille
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-12-25       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  The recurrent IgH translocations are highly associated with nonhyperdiploid variant multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Rafael Fonseca; Carina S Debes-Marun; Elisa B Picken; Gordon W Dewald; Sandra C Bryant; Jerry M Winkler; Emily Blood; Martin M Oken; Rafael Santana-Dávila; Natalia González-Paz; Robert A Kyle; Morie A Gertz; Angela Dispenzieri; Martha Q Lacy; Philip R Greipp
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2003-06-12       Impact factor: 22.113

View more
  62 in total

1.  Chromosome 1q21 gains confer inferior outcomes in multiple myeloma treated with bortezomib but copy number variation and percentage of plasma cells involved have no additional prognostic value.

Authors:  Gang An; Yan Xu; Lihui Shi; Zhong Shizhen; Shuhui Deng; Zhenqing Xie; Weiwei Sui; Fenghuang Zhan; Lugui Qiu
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 9.941

2.  Adverse impact of high donor CD3+ cell dose on outcome following tandem auto-NMA allogeneic transplantation for high-risk myeloma.

Authors:  A P Nair; P Walker; A Kalff; K Bergin; J Hocking; S Avery; D J Curtis; S Patil; T Das; D Klarica; S Morgan; J Muirhead; M Gorniak; J Reynolds; A Spencer
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 5.483

3.  In search of the molecular consequences of 8p21 deletion in multiple myeloma: commentary on Gmidéne et al.

Authors:  Tolga Sutlu; Evren Alici; Gösta Gahrton; Hareth Nahi
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 3.064

4.  [Clincal features and treatment of multiple myeloma].

Authors:  E K Mai; H Goldschmidt
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 5.  The effect of novel therapies in high-molecular-risk multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Guido Lancman; Douglas Tremblay; Kevin Barley; Bart Barlogie; Hearn Jay Cho; Sundar Jagannath; Deepu Madduri; Erin Moshier; Samir Parekh; Ajai Chari
Journal:  Clin Adv Hematol Oncol       Date:  2017-11

Review 6.  Toward personalized treatment in multiple myeloma based on molecular characteristics.

Authors:  Charlotte Pawlyn; Faith E Davies
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2018-12-26       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  Tandem autologous/allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation with bortezomib maintenance therapy for high-risk myeloma.

Authors:  Damian J Green; David G Maloney; Barry E Storer; Brenda M Sandmaier; Leona A Holmberg; Pamela S Becker; Min Fang; Paul J Martin; George E Georges; Michelle E Bouvier; Rainer Storb; Marco Mielcarek
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2017-11-09

8.  Combining fluorescent in situ hybridization data with ISS staging improves risk assessment in myeloma: an International Myeloma Working Group collaborative project.

Authors:  H Avet-Loiseau; B G M Durie; M Cavo; M Attal; N Gutierrez; J Haessler; H Goldschmidt; R Hajek; J H Lee; O Sezer; B Barlogie; J Crowley; R Fonseca; N Testoni; F Ross; S V Rajkumar; P Sonneveld; J Lahuerta; P Moreau; G Morgan
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 11.528

9.  Staging Systems for Newly Diagnosed Myeloma Patients Undergoing Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: The Revised International Staging System Shows the Most Differentiation between Groups.

Authors:  Emma C Scott; Parameswaran Hari; Sathish Kumar; Raphael Fraser; Omar Davila; Nina Shah; Robert Peter Gale; Miguel Angel Diaz; Vaibhav Agrawal; Robert F Cornell; Siddhartha Ganguly; Gorgun Akpek; Cesar Freytes; Shahrukh Hashmi; Ehsan Malek; Rammurti T Kamble; Hillard Lazarus; Melhem Solh; Saad Z Usmani; Abraham S Kanate; Ayman Saad; Saurabh Chhabra; Usama Gergis; Jan Cerny; Robert A Kyle; Cindy Lee; Tamila Kindwall-Keller; Amer Assal; Gerhard C Hildebrandt; Leona Holmberg; Richard T Maziarz; Taiga Nishihori; Sachiko Seo; Shaji Kumar; Tomer Mark; Anita D'Souza
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) improves the risk assessment of ISS staging in newly diagnosed MM patients treated upfront with novel agents.

Authors:  A Romano; N L Parrinello; M L Consoli; L Marchionni; S Forte; C Conticello; A Pompa; A Corso; G Milone; F Di Raimondo; I Borrello
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 3.673

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.