BACKGROUND: Chromosomal abnormalities have been shown to play a major role in disease evolution of multiple myeloma. Specific changes in interphase cells can be detected by fluorescent in situ hybridization, which overcomes the problem of the lack of dividing cells required for conventional cytogenetics. DESIGN AND METHODS: We analyzed the prognostic value of 12 frequent chromosomal abnormalities detected by fluorescent in situ hybridization in a series of patients (n=315) with newly diagnosed, symptomatic multiple myeloma. All patients underwent frontline autologous stem cell transplantation according to the GMMG-HD3- or GMMG-HD4-trial protocols or analogous protocols. RESULTS: Univariate statistical analyses revealed that the presence of del(13q14), del(17p13), t(4;14), +1q21 and non-hyperdiploidy was associated with adverse progression-free and overall survival rates independently of the International Staging System (ISS) classification. Multivariate analyses showed that only t(4;14) and del(17p13) retained prognostic value for both progression-free and overall survival. According to the presence or absence of t(4;14) and del(17p13) and the patients' International Staging System classification, the cohort could be stratified into three distinct groups: a group with a favorable prognosis [absence of t(4;14)/del(17p13) and ISS I], a group with a poor prognosis [presence of t(4;14)/del(17p13) and ISS II/III] and a group with an intermediate prognosis (all remaining patients). The probabilities of overall survival at 5 years decreased from 72% in the favorable prognostic group to 62% (hazard ratio 2.4; P=0.01) in the intermediate and 41% (hazard ratio 5.6; P<0.001) in the poor prognostic groups. CONCLUSIONS: These results have implications for risk-adapted management for patients with multiple myeloma undergoing high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation and suggest that new treatment concepts are urgently needed for patients who belong to the poor prognosis group. As targeted therapies evolve, different treatment options might have variable success, depending on the underlying genetic nature of the clone.
BACKGROUND:Chromosomal abnormalities have been shown to play a major role in disease evolution of multiple myeloma. Specific changes in interphase cells can be detected by fluorescent in situ hybridization, which overcomes the problem of the lack of dividing cells required for conventional cytogenetics. DESIGN AND METHODS: We analyzed the prognostic value of 12 frequent chromosomal abnormalities detected by fluorescent in situ hybridization in a series of patients (n=315) with newly diagnosed, symptomatic multiple myeloma. All patients underwent frontline autologous stem cell transplantation according to the GMMG-HD3- or GMMG-HD4-trial protocols or analogous protocols. RESULTS: Univariate statistical analyses revealed that the presence of del(13q14), del(17p13), t(4;14), +1q21 and non-hyperdiploidy was associated with adverse progression-free and overall survival rates independently of the International Staging System (ISS) classification. Multivariate analyses showed that only t(4;14) and del(17p13) retained prognostic value for both progression-free and overall survival. According to the presence or absence of t(4;14) and del(17p13) and the patients' International Staging System classification, the cohort could be stratified into three distinct groups: a group with a favorable prognosis [absence of t(4;14)/del(17p13) and ISS I], a group with a poor prognosis [presence of t(4;14)/del(17p13) and ISS II/III] and a group with an intermediate prognosis (all remaining patients). The probabilities of overall survival at 5 years decreased from 72% in the favorable prognostic group to 62% (hazard ratio 2.4; P=0.01) in the intermediate and 41% (hazard ratio 5.6; P<0.001) in the poor prognostic groups. CONCLUSIONS: These results have implications for risk-adapted management for patients with multiple myeloma undergoing high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation and suggest that new treatment concepts are urgently needed for patients who belong to the poor prognosis group. As targeted therapies evolve, different treatment options might have variable success, depending on the underlying genetic nature of the clone.
Authors: N Zojer; R Königsberg; J Ackermann; E Fritz; S Dallinger; E Krömer; H Kaufmann; L Riedl; H Gisslinger; S Schreiber; R Heinz; H Ludwig; H Huber; J Drach Journal: Blood Date: 2000-03-15 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Rafael Fonseca; Emily A Blood; Martin M Oken; Robert A Kyle; Gordon W Dewald; Richard J Bailey; Scott A Van Wier; Kimberly J Henderson; James D Hoyer; David Harrington; Neil E Kay; Brian Van Ness; Philip R Greipp Journal: Blood Date: 2002-05-15 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: S Wuilleme; N Robillard; L Lodé; F Magrangeas; H Beris; J-L Harousseau; J Proffitt; S Minvielle; H Avet-Loiseau Journal: Leukemia Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 11.528
Authors: C S Debes-Marun; G W Dewald; S Bryant; E Picken; R Santana-Dávila; N González-Paz; J M Winkler; R A Kyle; M A Gertz; T E Witzig; A Dispenzieri; M Q Lacy; S V Rajkumar; J A Lust; P R Greipp; R Fonseca Journal: Leukemia Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 11.528
Authors: J Anthony Child; Gareth J Morgan; Faith E Davies; Roger G Owen; Susan E Bell; Kim Hawkins; Julia Brown; Mark T Drayson; Peter J Selby Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-05-08 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Rafael Fonseca; Emily Blood; Montserrat Rue; David Harrington; Martin M Oken; Robert A Kyle; Gordon W Dewald; Brian Van Ness; Scott A Van Wier; Kimberly J Henderson; Richard J Bailey; Philip R Greipp Journal: Blood Date: 2003-02-06 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Hong Chang; Stephen Sloan; Dan Li; Lihua Zhuang; Qi-Long Yi; Christine I Chen; Donna Reece; Kathy Chun; A Keith Stewart Journal: Br J Haematol Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 6.998
Authors: Rafael Fonseca; Carina S Debes-Marun; Elisa B Picken; Gordon W Dewald; Sandra C Bryant; Jerry M Winkler; Emily Blood; Martin M Oken; Rafael Santana-Dávila; Natalia González-Paz; Robert A Kyle; Morie A Gertz; Angela Dispenzieri; Martha Q Lacy; Philip R Greipp Journal: Blood Date: 2003-06-12 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: A P Nair; P Walker; A Kalff; K Bergin; J Hocking; S Avery; D J Curtis; S Patil; T Das; D Klarica; S Morgan; J Muirhead; M Gorniak; J Reynolds; A Spencer Journal: Bone Marrow Transplant Date: 2017-03-20 Impact factor: 5.483
Authors: Damian J Green; David G Maloney; Barry E Storer; Brenda M Sandmaier; Leona A Holmberg; Pamela S Becker; Min Fang; Paul J Martin; George E Georges; Michelle E Bouvier; Rainer Storb; Marco Mielcarek Journal: Blood Adv Date: 2017-11-09
Authors: H Avet-Loiseau; B G M Durie; M Cavo; M Attal; N Gutierrez; J Haessler; H Goldschmidt; R Hajek; J H Lee; O Sezer; B Barlogie; J Crowley; R Fonseca; N Testoni; F Ross; S V Rajkumar; P Sonneveld; J Lahuerta; P Moreau; G Morgan Journal: Leukemia Date: 2012-10-03 Impact factor: 11.528
Authors: Emma C Scott; Parameswaran Hari; Sathish Kumar; Raphael Fraser; Omar Davila; Nina Shah; Robert Peter Gale; Miguel Angel Diaz; Vaibhav Agrawal; Robert F Cornell; Siddhartha Ganguly; Gorgun Akpek; Cesar Freytes; Shahrukh Hashmi; Ehsan Malek; Rammurti T Kamble; Hillard Lazarus; Melhem Solh; Saad Z Usmani; Abraham S Kanate; Ayman Saad; Saurabh Chhabra; Usama Gergis; Jan Cerny; Robert A Kyle; Cindy Lee; Tamila Kindwall-Keller; Amer Assal; Gerhard C Hildebrandt; Leona Holmberg; Richard T Maziarz; Taiga Nishihori; Sachiko Seo; Shaji Kumar; Tomer Mark; Anita D'Souza Journal: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant Date: 2018-08-22 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: A Romano; N L Parrinello; M L Consoli; L Marchionni; S Forte; C Conticello; A Pompa; A Corso; G Milone; F Di Raimondo; I Borrello Journal: Ann Hematol Date: 2015-07-31 Impact factor: 3.673