Literature DB >> 2021950

Lysosomal localization and mechanism of uptake of Nile blue photosensitizers in tumor cells.

C W Lin1, J R Shulok, S D Kirley, L Cincotta, J W Foley.   

Abstract

Nile blue derivatives have been shown to be potentially effective photosensitizers for photodynamic therapy of malignant tumors. Results of a previous study suggested that the high accumulation of these dyes in cells may be the result of dye aggregation, partition in membrane lipids, and/or sequestration in subcellular organelles. In this report, results of studies are presented from an investigation of the subcellular localization and mechanism of accumulation of these dyes in cells in vitro. A video-enhanced fluorescence microscopy was used, and a punctate pattern of fluorescence was seen, most of which was localized in the perinuclear region with extracellular dye concentrations between 1 to 100 nM. These particles resembled characteristic particles identified by standard lysosomal dyes. At higher dye concentrations (1 microM or above), fluorescence in the perinuclear region was too intense to resolve into discrete cellular structures, while fluorescence in other cellular structures including mitochondria and cytomembranes was visible. At even higher dye concentrations (10-100 microM), Nile blue derivatives were seen with a light microscope as blue particles, the size and location of which resembled the punctate fluorescence described above. Results which further suggest that the lysosome is the main site of dye localization include (a) histochemical staining of dye-loaded cells with the lysosomal marker enzyme acid phosphatase, which showed similar localization of the enzyme-staining and dye-containing particles, (b) phototreatment of dye-loaded cells which obliterated the majority of the acid phosphatase-stained particles, and (c) treatments with agents affecting the membrane pH gradient reduced the uptake and enhanced the efflux of dyes, while agents that alter cellular membrane potentials had no effect on dye accumulation. The uptake of the dyes was partially inhibited by inhibitors of oxidative phosphorylation indicating that at least part of the process is energy dependent. These findings, together with previous results showing that the cellular uptake of these dyes is highly concentrative and proportional to the extracellular dye concentration over a wide range, are consistent with the hypothesis that the dyes are mainly localized in the lysosomes via an ion-trapping mechanism. Results of the present study also suggest that the lysosomes may be an intracellular target for photodynamic killing of tumor cells mediated by Nile blue photosensitizers and that lysosomotropic photosensitization may be a strategy for effective and selective destruction of tumor cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2021950

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  10 in total

Review 1.  Mechanisms of resistance to photodynamic therapy.

Authors:  A Casas; G Di Venosa; T Hasan
Journal:  Curr Med Chem       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  In Vitro Assessment of Binding Affinity, Selectivity, Uptake, Intracellular Degradation, and Toxicity of Nanobody-Photosensitizer Conjugates.

Authors:  Irati Beltrán Hernández; Timo W M De Groof; Raimond Heukers; Sabrina Oliveira
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

3.  Subcellular localisation of the antitumour drug mitoxantrone and the induction of DNA damage in resistant and sensitive human colon carcinoma cells.

Authors:  M E Fox; P J Smith
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 4.  Tailoring photosensitive ROS for advanced photodynamic therapy.

Authors:  Duc Loc Sai; Jieun Lee; Duc Long Nguyen; Young-Pil Kim
Journal:  Exp Mol Med       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 8.718

5.  In vitro and in vivo multidrug resistance reversal activity by a Betti-base derivative of tylosin.

Authors:  N Gyémánt; H Engi; Z Schelz; I Szatmári; D Tóth; F Fülöp; J Molnár; P A M de Witte
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  Nile Blue-based nanosized pH sensors for simultaneous far-red and near-infrared live bioimaging.

Authors:  Jeppe Madsen; Irene Canton; Nicholas J Warren; Efrosyni Themistou; Adam Blanazs; Burcin Ustbas; Xiaohe Tian; Russell Pearson; Giuseppe Battaglia; Andrew L Lewis; Steven P Armes
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 15.419

7.  In vitro plasma protein binding and cellular uptake of ATX-S10(Na), a hydrophilic chlorin photosensitizer.

Authors:  M Mori; T Kuroda; A Obana; I Sakata; T Hirano; S Nakajima; M Hikida; T Kumagai
Journal:  Jpn J Cancer Res       Date:  2000-08

Review 8.  Recent Advances in Organelle-Targeted Fluorescent Probes.

Authors:  Na-Eun Choi; Ji-Yu Lee; Eun-Chae Park; Ju-Hee Lee; Jiyoun Lee
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 9.  Boron-containing delocalised lipophilic cations for the selective targeting of cancer cells.

Authors:  Calabrese Gianpiero; Daou Anis; Rova Aikaterini; Tseligka Eirini; Vizirianakis S Ioannis; Fatouros G Dimitrios; Tsibouklis John
Journal:  Medchemcomm       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 3.597

10.  The possibility of using xenogeneic phagocytes in wound treatment.

Authors:  Andrey Yakovlev; Dmitry Tulin; Anna Savva; Anastasia Kruglikova
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.