| Literature DB >> 20551959 |
N Gyémánt1, H Engi, Z Schelz, I Szatmári, D Tóth, F Fülöp, J Molnár, P A M de Witte.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The multidrug resistance (Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20551959 PMCID: PMC2906729 DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605716
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Cancer ISSN: 0007-0920 Impact factor: 7.640
Figure 1Reaction scheme. (A) Tylosin, (B) Betti-base, (C) TBN (N-tylosil-1-α-amino-(3-bromophenyl)-methyl-2-naphthol). r.t., room temperature.
FARs of the compounds calculated on the basis of the measured fluorescence values (see Materials and methods)
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Verapamil | 22 | 10±3.2 |
| Betti-base | 3.5 | 10±5.1 |
| 35 | 8±1.7 | |
| Tylosin | 3.5 | 1±0.0 |
| 35 | 5±7.5 | |
| TBN | 3.5 | 105±8.5 |
| 35 | 94±25.5 |
Abbreviations: FAR=fluorescence activity ratio; TBN=N-tylosil-1-α-amino-(3-bromophenyl)-methyl-2-naphthol.
Non-resistant (parental cells) and human MDR1 gene-transfected L5178 mouse lymphoma cells were treated with rhodamine 123 and the individual compounds for 20 min at 37°C. The fluorescence of the cell population was then measured with a flow cytometer.
Mean and s.d. values were calculated from at least three independent experiments.
IC values calculated for the investigated compounds
|
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Betti-base | 5.0±4.4 | 40.2±4.5 | 75.3±5.2 | 0.5±0.1 | 4.1±0.2 | 35.3±8.3 |
| Tylosin | 133.1±52.8 | 410.0±31.8 | 885.4±51.0 | 76.1±49.4 | 561.3±66.4 | 1046.3±182.4 |
| TBN | 11.1±9.2 | 41.4±6.8 | 55.2±2.5 | 9.4±4.4 | 40.3±2.7 | 71.3±1.3 |
| Doxorubicin | 0.02±0.01 | 1.8±0.5 | 14.6±1.7 | 0.005±0.001 | 0.022±0.2 | 0.359±0.05 |
Abbreviation: TBN=N-tylosil-1-α-amino-(3-bromophenyl)-methyl-2-naphthol.
Non-resistant (parental cells) and human MDR1 gene-transfected (transfected cells) L5178 mouse lymphoma cells were treated with different concentrations of the compounds or vehicle and incubated in cell culture plates at 37°C for 72 h. At the end of the incubation period, the relative cell density was determined using an MTT assay and optical density reading. From the inhibitory curves obtained, corresponding IC10, IC50 and IC90 values were calculated.
Mean and s.d. values were calculated from at least three independent experiments.
IC50 values and AF calculated for doxorubicin, when combined with the Betti-base, tylosin or TBN
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Betti-base IC10 | 0.2±0.3 | 9.2 | 0.01±0.2 | 1.7 |
| Betti-base IC10/10 | 2.5±0.5 | 0.7 | 0.02±0.2 | 1.0 |
| Tylosin IC10 | 0.2±0.1 | 7.4 | 0.02±0.3 | 1.1 |
| Tylosin IC10/10 | 0.2±0.1 | 7.4 | 0.02±0.2 | 0.6 |
| TBN IC10 | 0.01±0.1 | 134.1 | 0.008±0.1 | 2.8 |
| TBN IC10/10 | 0.2±0.1 | 10.5 | 0.05±0.02 | 0.4 |
Abbreviations: AF=antiproliferative factors; TBN=N-tylosil-1-α-amino-(3-bromophenyl)-methyl-2-naphthol.
Non-resistant (parental cells) and human MDR1 gene-transfected (transfected cells) L5178 mouse lymphoma cells were treated in cell culture plates at 37°C for 72 h with different concentrations of doxorubicin, and co-incubated with the IC10 or a 10-fold lower concentration (IC10/10) of the Betti-base, tylosin or TBN. At the end of the incubation period, the relative cell density was determined using an MTT assay and optical density reading. From the inhibitory curves obtained, corresponding IC50 values were calculated. AF were determined by dividing the IC50 value of doxorubicin in the absence of the Betti-base, tylosin or TBN by the IC50 value of doxorubicin in their presence.
Mean and s.e. values were calculated from at least four independent experiments.
Figure 2(A) Doxorubicin accumulation (in μg ml–1, assuming an average volume of 3 μl per 106 cells) in non-resistant (parental cells) and human MDR1 gene-transfected (transfected cells) L5178 mouse lymphoma cells. Cells were exposed to 40 μM doxorubicin for 1 h (with or without 10 μM TBN), after which they were extracted and the amount of doxorubicin quantified by LC. The values are mean ± s.d. of three independent experiments. (B) Effect of 40 μM doxorubicin for 1 h (with or without 10 μM TBN) on the proliferation of the different cells. After treatment, cells were washed and cultured for 48 h at 37°C using 96-well plates. The values are mean ± s.d. of three independent experiments (each conducted in triplicate). Significant differences between means, as specified by capped lines, are indicated by ***P<0.0001. ns, not significant.
Figure 3Accumulation of doxorubicin (in μg g–1) in tumours consisting of parental or transfected L5178 cells growing subcutaneously in DBA/2 mice. Mice were treated with doxorubicin (A: 10 mg kg–1, i.p.; B: 10 mg kg–1, i.v.). (A) TBN (10 mg kg–1) was administered (or not) i.p. 3 h or i.v. 1 h before doxorubicin treatment; (B) TBN (50 mg kg–1) was administered (or not) i.p. 3 h before doxorubicin treatment. Tumours were excised 24 h later, stored at −20°C until extraction and LC analysis. The values are mean ± s.d. of seven independent experiments. Significant differences between means, as specified by capped lines, are indicated by **P<0.001. ns, not significant.
Figure 4Tissue distribution of doxorubicin. Balb/c mice were injected with doxorubicin alone i.v. (10 mg kg–1) or with TBN (50 mg kg–1) i.p. 3 h before doxorubicin i.v. (10 mg kg–1). At various times after doxorubicin injection (30 min, 1, 5, 24 and 48 h) three to five mice were killed. Plasma and tissue samples from liver, kidneys and heart were collected and stored at −20°C until extraction and liquid chromatography analysis. The values are mean ± s.e.
Figure 5Antitumour activity of doxorubicin in the presence or absence of TBN. Tumours consisted of parental (C) or transfected L5178 cells (A, B) growing subcutaneously in DBA/2 mice. When the tumour size reached 0.5 cm diameter, the animals were randomised and treated every second day. The TBN (A: 10 mg kg–1; B: 50 mg kg–1) was administered (or not) i.p. 3 h before doxorubicin (A: 4 mg kg–1; B: 2 mg kg–1, C: 4 mg kg–1) was injected i.p. Animals were weighed every second day and the experiments were terminated on 12th day. The values represent mean ± s.e. of five to eight animals per group. Significant differences on the individual days between means of the ‘doxorubicin’ arm and the ‘doxorubicin ± TBN’ arm (A, B) or ‘control’ arm and the ‘doxorubicin’ arm (C) are indicated by *P<0.01, **P<0.001 and ***P<0.0001. No indication implies no significant difference between the means.
Figure 6Effect of doxorubicin on the tumour weight in the presence or absence of TBN. Tumours consisted of transfected L5178 cells growing subcutaneously in DBA/2 mice. When the tumour size reached 0.5 cm diameter, the animals were randomised and treated every second day. The TBN (10 or 50 mg kg–1) was administered i.p. 3 h before doxorubicin (4 or 2 mg kg–1, respectively) was injected i.p. On day 12, animals were killed and tumours were excised and weighed. The values represent mean ± s.e. of five to eight animals per group. Significant differences between means, as specified by capped lines, are indicated by **P<0.001. ns, not significant.