Diblock copolymer vesicles are tagged with pH-responsive Nile Blue-based labels and used as a new type of pH-responsive colorimetric/fluorescent biosensor for far-red and near-infrared imaging of live cells. The diblock copolymer vesicles described herein are based on poly(2-(methacryloyloxy)ethyl phosphorylcholine-block-2-(diisopropylamino)ethyl methacrylate) [PMPC-PDPA]: the biomimetic PMPC block is known to facilitate rapid cell uptake for a wide range of cell lines, while the PDPA block constitutes the pH-responsive component that enables facile vesicle self-assembly in aqueous solution. These biocompatible vesicles can be utilized to detect interstitial hypoxic/acidic regions in a tumor model via a pH-dependent colorimetric shift. In addition, they are also useful for selective intracellular staining of lysosomes and early endosomes via subtle changes in fluorescence emission. Such nanoparticles combine efficient cellular uptake with a pH-responsive Nile Blue dye label to produce a highly versatile dual capability probe. This is in marked contrast to small molecule dyes, which are usually poorly uptaken by cells, frequently exhibit cytotoxicity, and are characterized by intracellular distributions invariably dictated by their hydrophilic/hydrophobic balance.
Diblock copolymer vesicles are tagged with pH-responsive Nile Blue-based labels and used as a new type of pH-responsive colorimetric/fluorescent biosensor for far-red and near-infrared imaging of live cells. The diblock copolymer vesicles described herein are based on poly(2-(methacryloyloxy)ethyl phosphorylcholine-block-2-(diisopropylamino)ethyl methacrylate) [PMPC-PDPA]: the biomimetic PMPC block is known to facilitate rapid cell uptake for a wide range of cell lines, while the PDPA block constitutes the pH-responsive component that enables facile vesicle self-assembly in aqueous solution. These biocompatible vesicles can be utilized to detect interstitial hypoxic/acidic regions in a tumor model via a pH-dependent colorimetric shift. In addition, they are also useful for selective intracellular staining of lysosomes and early endosomes via subtle changes in fluorescence emission. Such nanoparticles combine efficient cellular uptake with a pH-responsive Nile Blue dye label to produce a highly versatile dual capability probe. This is in marked contrast to small molecule dyes, which are usually poorly uptaken by cells, frequently exhibit cytotoxicity, and are characterized by intracellular distributions invariably dictated by their hydrophilic/hydrophobic balance.
Fluorescent probes
are widely used for imaging in cell biology.
Increasingly, they are also being utilized as chemosensors to diagnose
specific pathological conditions and report on cellular events.[1−3] There is considerable interest in designing nanoparticles that report
on physiologically relevant species such as ions,[4−6] reactive oxygen
species,[7−9] gaseous biological second messengers[10−12] and hydrogen ions.[9,13,14] In particular, pH probes have diagnostic potential because many
diseases are associated with changes in the local pH.[15] These include clinical and subclinical inflammation,[16] many lung-related pathologies,[17] kidney dysfunction,[18] ischemia,[19] and cancer.[20] In
malignant tumors, the interstitial pH is lower than in normal tissue,
and this parameter can be correlated with both poorer prognosis and
weaker responses to available therapies.[21,22] This lower interstitial pH is a result of increased lactic acid
production and reduced buffering and perfusion,[23] while the intracellular pH of the tumor cells typically
remains at physiological levels.[24−26] Monitoring changes in
the interstitial fluid within tumors is a major challenge, as most
of the available probes penetrate cells and therefore only report
the intracellular pH. Additional concerns associated with diagnostic
probes are toxicity, targeting specificity, and signal-to-noise threshold.[27] For example, fluorescence spectroscopy and imaging
are normally considered to be highly sensitive techniques, with extremely
low detection limits being achieved under ideal conditions.[28] However, such sensitivity may be substantially
reduced in vivo, particularly if the emission spectrum of the selected
fluorophore overlaps with that of the living tissue. Thus there is
considerable interest in designing new fluorescent probes based on
dyes that emit in the far-red end of the visible spectrum, i.e. above
600–700 nm, in order to minimize such background interference.[29] Due to lower background interference, far red
and infrared light can penetrate much more deeply into living tissue,
which is beneficial for in vivo studies.[30,31]Herein we describe a facile method for labeling polymers prepared
by controlled radical polymerization techniques (e.g., atom transfer
radical polymerization (ATRP) or reversible addition–fragmentation
chain transfer (RAFT) polymerization) by reaction with Nile Blue-based
dyes, which are found to act as polymerization spin traps.
Synthesis
of Two Nile Blue-Based Vinyl Monomers Used in This Work
Nile Blue methacrylamide (NBM)
and Nile Blue 2-(methacryloyloxy)ethyl carbamate (NBC).This labeling principle was used to prepare nanoparticle-based
pH sensors composed of a pH-sensitive dye label and a biocompatible
pH-responsive diblock copolymer based on (2-(methacryloyloxy)ethyl
phosphorylcholine) [MPC] and 2-(diisopropylamino)ethyl
methacrylate [DPA].[32,33] PMPC-based nanoparticles have
been previously shown to penetrate tumors with high efficiency.[34] In addition, they can be rapidly incorporated
into many different cell types and are distributed inside intracellular
organelles.[35,36] The pH-sensitive probe is based
on Nile Blue. Both the absorption and emission properties of Nile
Blue derivatives are found to be pH-sensitive at around physiological
pH.These new nanoparticle probes report clinically relevant
pH changes
in tumors and cell organelles, thus enabling pH sensing both at the
interstitial level (as demonstrated with multicell tumor spheroids)
and also at the subcellular level.
Results and Discussion
Synthesis
of Nile Blue Dye Derivatives
The synthesis
of the Nile Blue methacrylamide (NBM) and Nile Blue 2-(methacryloyloxy)ethyl
carbamate (NBC) monomers used in this work is summarized in Scheme 1. Both monomers have been previously prepared by
similar synthetic routes.[37,38] These methacrylic dyes
were used as prepared for copolymerizations, but were further purified
using column chromatography in order to assess their spectroscopic
properties (Table S1 of the Supporting Information,
SI). Dye purity before and after column chromatography was
assessed using HPLC (Table S1 of the SI). Each monomer was characterized by absorption spectroscopy studies
in ethanol (Table S1 and Figure S1 of the SI). Both the absorption coefficient at λmax and the
integral absorption coefficient[39] were
determined for each dye label and found to be close to the values
measured for a commercially available Nile Blue dye precursor (95%
purity, laser grade), which suggests high purities for these Nile
Blue-based monomers (Table S1 of the SI).
Scheme 1
Synthesis
of Two Nile Blue-Based Vinyl Monomers Used in This Work
Nile Blue methacrylamide (NBM)
and Nile Blue 2-(methacryloyloxy)ethyl carbamate (NBC).
Dye-Labeling of PMPC
In initial experiments, it was
found that statistical copolymerization of MPC with small quantities
of either NBC, NBM, or NB via Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization
(ATRP) afforded dye-labeled copolymers with somewhat lower dye contents
than those targeted (Table S2 of the SI). This protocol also significantly retarded the overall rate of
copolymerization (Figure S2 of the SI).
Similar retardation/inhibition was also observed when attempting to
copolymerize NBM and NBC using reversible addition–fragmentation
chain transfer (RAFT) polymerization (Figure S3 of the SI). With the benefit of hindsight, Nile Blue
is structurally similar to well-known polymerization inhibitors such
as methylene blue or phenothiazine (Figure S4 of the SI). Thus it seems that these Nile Blue derivatives act as
spin traps during their copolymerization with MPC, leading to retardation
effects (Figure S5 of the SI).[40] We hypothesized that well-defined Nile Blue-labeled
polymers could be conveniently prepared by reacting Nile Blue with
the propagating polymer radicals, thus quenching the polymerization
and leading to a terminally attached dye label (see Figure S5 A, eq
7 of the SI). This hypothesis is supported
by literature data for the reaction of phenothiazine and related compounds
with alkyl radicals.[41] This suggests that
the rate of reaction between alkyl radicals and vinyl monomers is
at least as fast (or faster) as that between alkyl radicals and phenothiazine-like
compounds. On the basis of the results described in ref (41) and also data obtained
for the polymerization of aniline[42] the
quenched polymer chain is most likely conjugated to the Nile Blue
via its iminium nitrogen (see Figure S5B of the SI), but further mechanistic details are beyond the scope
of the present study. For NBM, reaction with the double bond seems
likely, which would produce a persistent radical that is stabilized
via conjugation. For NBC, reaction with the double bond could lead
to an intramolecular reaction with the aromatic ring, leading to a
stabilized radical. Thus Nile Blue precursor was
added to a MPC homopolymerization at a monomer conversion
of around 70–80% (Table S2, entry 7 of the SI). This protocol minimizes the problem of retardation and
hence improves the overall yield: the dye label reacted with 8% of
the PMPC chains, which were of relatively low polydispersity. The
NBM and NBC comonomers were also added to separate MPC homopolymerizations
at similarly high conversions (see Table S2, entries 5 and 6, respectively,
of the SI). In these latter syntheses,
the dye label can be incorporated via copolymerization, as well as
acting as a chain transfer agent. Thus the final dye contents were
slightly higher when using NBM and NBC, compared to that achieved
for Nile Blue alone (compare entries 5, 6, and 7 in Table S2 of the SI). However, the conjugated dye content never
exceeded 16 mol % of the added dye, so extensive dialysis was required
to remove non-conjugated dye (see SI).
Deprotonation of (a) NB, (b) NBM, and (c) NBC
The monocationic form of Nile
Blue is stabilized by resonance, thereby increasing its pKa to around 10. In contrast, NBM and NBC cannot form such
resonance structures, thus their pKa values
are correspondingly lower.Furthermore, the
rate of ATRP or RAFT copolymerization decreases
in the presence of each Nile Blue monomer (Figures S2 and S3 of the SI) and no significant increase in monomer conversion
was found by 1H NMR spectroscopy when the dye was added
at high conversion (data not shown). These observations suggest that
all three vinyl-functional dyes actually act mainly as chain transfer
agents, rather than as comonomers.
Absorption and Emission
Properties of Dye-Labeled PMPC Homopolymers
The maximum emission wavelength of all labeled
PMPC homopolymers in PBS at pH 7.2 was within 20 nm of 674 nm, the
literature value reported for Nile Blue (Table S2 of the SI).[43] However, the
maximum absorption wavelength shifted to around 590
nm for homopolymers labeled with NBM and NBC. In contrast, homopolymers
terminated using unmodified Nile Blue precursor had
a maximum absorption wavelength close to 650 nm in PBS. (Table S2
and Figure S7 of the SI). Relative quantum
yields were determined for all Nile Blue-labeled homopolymers in PBS
at pH 7.2 (Table S2 of the SI). NBM-labeled
chains had relatively low quantum yields, comparable to that of Nile
Blue. However, Nile Blue-terminated PMPC chains generally gave higher
quantum yields. This agrees with previous literature reports suggesting
that solubilizing groups (in this case the PMPC chain) suppress dye
aggregation in aqueous solution.[43,44] If NBC was
used as a comonomer, then relative quantum yields are generally one
order of magnitude greater than for Nile Blue (Table S2 of the SI). Similarly high quantum yields have been
reported for deprotonated Nile Blue (Scheme 2).[45]
Scheme 2
Deprotonation of (a) NB, (b) NBM, and (c) NBC
The monocationic form of Nile
Blue is stabilized by resonance, thereby increasing its pKa to around 10. In contrast, NBM and NBC cannot form such
resonance structures, thus their pKa values
are correspondingly lower.
The pH-dependent fluorescence
of dye-labeled PMPC homopolymers was examined (see Figures S8 and
S9 of the SI). Chains labeled with unmodified
Nile Blue exhibited a low emission intensity below pH 3, and enhanced
emission above pH 8. Stronger emission in alkaline solution suggests
deprotonation of the Nile Blue (see Scheme 2a).[46] Reduced emission observed in acidic
solution is most likely related to protonation of Nile Blue at the
second nitrogen on the ring.[47] As shown
in Scheme 2a, monocationic Nile Blue is resonance-stabilized,
which accounts for its unusually high pKa compared to other aromatic amines such as aniline.[48] The fluorescence behavior of the PMPC homopolymers labeled
with either NBM or NBC exhibits pH-sensitivity in the physiological
region (Figures S8 and S9 of the SI). Below
pH 6, a single emission band was observed at 670 nm for PMPC41NBM0.16. Above pH 6, a new band appeared at around
700 nm. The 700/670 nm emission intensity ratio increased significantly
at higher pH for PMPC41-NBM0.18, whereas this
ratio remained essentially constant for PMPC chains labeled with either
NB or NBC (Figure S9 of the SI). In contrast,
the integrated emission intensity of PMPC41NBC0.10 increased by one order of magnitude between pH 5 and pH
8 (Figure S9 of the SI). This strongly
enhanced emission is consistent with the higher quantum yields found
for this particular polymer (Table S2 of the SI). Studies of lipophilic Nile Blue derivatives with chemical structures
similar to NBM and NBC have reported lower pKa values than for nonmodified Nile Blue.[49] This is probably due to the electron-withdrawing effect
of the carbonyl substituent on the iminenitrogen, which destabilizes
the monocationic derivatives relative to unmodified Nile Blue. Such
destabilization leads to lower pKa values
that are comparable to those found for other aromatic amines such
as aniline[48] (see Scheme 2).The spectral changes observed for PMPC chains labeled
with NBM
and NBC occur at slightly lower pH values compared to those found
for the NBM and NBC monomers (Figures S9 and S10 of the SI). Moreover, the fluorescence intensity of
the labeled homopolymers increases at higher pH. This is in striking
contrast to the behavior of the corresponding monomers, for which
a reduction in intensity is observed at higher pH.
However, the deprotonated forms of NBM and NBC are stabilized in aqueous
solution when conjugated to a highly hydrophilic PMPC chain, which
explains the lower pH transition. In contrast, the corresponding deprotonated
monomers have relatively low aqueous solubilities, similar to what
has previously been observed for structurally related lipophilic Nile
Blue derivatives.[49] Therefore, the polymerized
fluorophores are significantly more fluorescent in aqueous solution
than their vinyl monomer counterparts (Figure S9 of the SI)
Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization (ATRP)
Synthesis of PMPC-PDPA
Diblock Copolymers Terminated with Either Nile Blue (NB) Alone or
Containing a Nile Blue-Based Comonomer (Either NBM or NBC)
In each synthesis, the Nile
Blue-based reagent was added after approximately 80% conversion of
the DPA monomer, as judged by 1H NMR spectroscopy.Visible absorption characteristics of three PMPC25PDPA59NBC0.08, PMPC25PDPA62NBM0.13 and PMPC25PDPA61NB0.13 diblock copolymers as a function
of pH. (a) Digital photographs obtained for 5 mg/mL aqueous copolymer
solutions in 1 cm cuvette cells. (b) Variation of λmax with solution pH. (c) Absorption spectra recorded at pH 5. (d) Absorption
spectra recorded at pH 6. (e) Absorption spectra recorded at pH 7.
Spectrometer settings: Scan speed = 200 nm min–1; bandwidth = 1.5 nm.(a) Ultralow attachment 96-well plate model for the growth of multicellular
tumor spheroids (MCTS), which were exposed to 1.0 g/L Nile Blue labeled
PMPC-PDPAdiblock copolymers for 36 h and corresponding digital photographs
recorded for two wells containing 15-day-old MCTS after exposure to
the copolymer nanoparticles for 36 h. (b) pH-Dependent staining of
MCTS by Nile Blue-labeled PMPC-PDPA copolymers. Bright-field optical
images of Nile Blue-labeled copolymer-treated MCTS and controls were
recorded using a Leica DMI4000B instrument equipped with a Nuance
Multispectral imaging System. Untreated control spheroids were used
to subtract the background noise from these images. Image analysis
was performed double-blinded. Four independent observers were asked
to score the center of the tumor (white star), the edge (red dotted
line) and whether the observer could identify the boundary for the
color change (black dotted line). Hypoxic (low pH) regions of the
spheroids were compared to a positive control marker for hypoxia (Glut-1
immunostaining).
Dye-Labeled PMPC-PDPA Diblock
Copolymers
Although the
pH-sensitive emission of the labeled homopolymers occurs within a
pH range that is physiologically relevant, PMPC homopolymers do not enter cells (Figure S11 of the SI).[50] Therefore, in order to exploit this
unexpected pH-dependence, three pH-responsive PMPC-PDPAdiblock copolymers[32] were prepared using either NB, NBC, or NBM (Scheme 3). In each case, the PMPC block was used as a macroinitiator
and the dye label was added at relatively high DPA conversion (around
80%). Vesicle-forming pH-responsive PMPC-PDPAdiblock copolymers with
similar compositions have been previously used for both in vitro and
in vivo drug delivery.[33−35,51,52] The effect of varying the solution pH on the absorption of the three
labeled pH-responsive diblock copolymers is shown in Figure 1. Raising the pH did not lead to a significant change
in the color of the PMPC25-PDPA61-NB0.13 solution/dispersion up to pH 9, whereas a distinct color change
from blue to purple was observed between pH 5 and 6 for PMPC25PDPA59NBC0.08 and between pH 6
and 7 for PMPC25PDPA62NBM0.13 (Figure 1a). Deprotonation of the PDPA block,
which occurs just above pH 6, leads to in situ self-assembly to form
diblock copolymer vesicles.[32] The vesicle
membranes comprise PDPA chains, which provide a highly hydrophobic
environment that shifts the absorption wavelength of the Nile Blue
label and increases its quantum yield.[41,43] Figure 1b shows how λmax varies with pH
for all three copolymers. The λmax observed for PMPC25PDPA61NB0.13 decreases
sharply from 640 to 585 nm between pH 6.0 and pH 6.4. This pH range
corresponds approximately to the known pKa of the PDPA block.[32] Close examination
of the absorption spectra at pH 5, 6, and 7 (Figure 1c-1e) reveals an additional feature
at around 485 nm, which corresponds to the peak assigned to deprotonated
Nile Blue within reverse micelles reported by Das et al.[41] However, in the spectrum recorded at pH 7 a
640 nm peak is still visible, despite the strong light scattering
caused by vesicle formation (Figure 1e). This
latter feature corresponds to protonated Nile Blue, and was also observed
for the reverse micelle system described by Das et al.[41] The residual protonated Nile Blue is responsible
for the absence of any color change in the copolymer solutions (Figure 1a). In contrast, the λmax is reduced
much more gradually from around 600 nm at pH 5 to around 500 nm at
pH 7 for both PMPC25PDPA59NBC0.08 and PMPC25PDPA62NBM0.13 (see Figure 1b). Inspection of
the absorption spectra obtained for these two copolymers show one
dominant peak that shifts between pH 5 and 7 (see Figure 1c-1e). In this case, there
is no residual peak from the protonated dye and the color shift is
much more pronounced for these two copolymer solutions (see Figure 1a).
Scheme 3
Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization (ATRP)
Synthesis of PMPC-PDPA
Diblock Copolymers Terminated with Either Nile Blue (NB) Alone or
Containing a Nile Blue-Based Comonomer (Either NBM or NBC)
In each synthesis, the Nile
Blue-based reagent was added after approximately 80% conversion of
the DPA monomer, as judged by 1H NMR spectroscopy.
Figure 1
Visible absorption characteristics of three PMPC25PDPA59NBC0.08, PMPC25PDPA62NBM0.13 and PMPC25PDPA61NB0.13 diblock copolymers as a function
of pH. (a) Digital photographs obtained for 5 mg/mL aqueous copolymer
solutions in 1 cm cuvette cells. (b) Variation of λmax with solution pH. (c) Absorption spectra recorded at pH 5. (d) Absorption
spectra recorded at pH 6. (e) Absorption spectra recorded at pH 7.
Spectrometer settings: Scan speed = 200 nm min–1; bandwidth = 1.5 nm.
Toxicity of Dye-Labeled PMPC-PDPA Block Copolymers
Vesicle biocompatibility studies of the three Nile Blue-labeled
PMPC-PDPAdiblock copolymers were performed on human dermal fibroblasts (Figure
S13 of the SI). High cell viabilities were
obtained, which is consistent with those previously observed for PMPC-PDPAdiblock copolymers.[33,36]Monitoring the reduction in local pH within
multicellular tumor
spheroids (MCTS) over time using Nile Blue-labeled PMPC-PDPA diblock
copolymer vesicles. MDA-MB-231breast tumor spheroids were grown on
ultralow adhesion 96-well plates. These MCTS samples were treated
with 1.0 g/L of PMPC-PDPA vesicles for 36 h and then imaged using
an optical microscope (Leica Caliper LS, 20X, which corresponds to
approximately 25% of the total area of an MCTS). Micrographs were
analyzed de viso (see Figure 2b) and the radii
of the hypoxic (blue, acidic) areas of the spheroids were compared
to the overall MCTS radii. The hypoxic/tumor radius ratio was monitored
over time for 5, 10, or 15 days. Immunolabeling of Glut-1 was used
as a control for fixed spheroid hypoxia. Data are expressed as mean
radius ratios for N = 3 independent experiments ±
SEM.
Figure 2
(a) Ultralow attachment 96-well plate model for the growth of multicellular
tumor spheroids (MCTS), which were exposed to 1.0 g/L Nile Blue labeled
PMPC-PDPA diblock copolymers for 36 h and corresponding digital photographs
recorded for two wells containing 15-day-old MCTS after exposure to
the copolymer nanoparticles for 36 h. (b) pH-Dependent staining of
MCTS by Nile Blue-labeled PMPC-PDPA copolymers. Bright-field optical
images of Nile Blue-labeled copolymer-treated MCTS and controls were
recorded using a Leica DMI4000B instrument equipped with a Nuance
Multispectral imaging System. Untreated control spheroids were used
to subtract the background noise from these images. Image analysis
was performed double-blinded. Four independent observers were asked
to score the center of the tumor (white star), the edge (red dotted
line) and whether the observer could identify the boundary for the
color change (black dotted line). Hypoxic (low pH) regions of the
spheroids were compared to a positive control marker for hypoxia (Glut-1
immunostaining).
Use of Dye-Labeled PMPC-PDPA
Block Copolymers for Monitoring
Hypoxic Regions in Tumor Models
The sensitivity of the three
Nile Blue-labeled PMPC-PDPAdiblock copolymers to the local pH within
a multicell tumor spheroid (MCTS) model was evaluated. Given its marked
gradients in pH,[53] oxygen, and glucose
concentration between the outer and inner regions,[54,55] the MCTS model is generally considered to be a superior mimic for
the physiological changes that occur in avascular tumor tissues compared
to cell monolayers.[56] Figure 2 confirms that the pH-sensitivity of PMPC25PDPA59NBC0.08 and PMPC25PDPA62NBM0.13 enables the local pH to be conveniently
monitored within MCTS tissue. Culturing of MCTS for 5, 10, or 15 days
allowed tissue growth, thus increasing the area of the hypoxic region
over time. For comparative assessment of the probes, immunostaining
of glucose transporter 1 (Glut-1) in MCTS was performed as a positive
control (see Figure 2b). This approach is well
established for fixed (dead) tissue, but is not applicable for live
tissue. Glut-1 expression has been reported to correlate well with
tumor hypoxia both in vivo[57] and in MCTS
models.[58] In the latter case, its use results
in a gradient of increasing intensity toward the center of the spheroid.
For copolymer-treated MCTS, the growth of the hypoxic region could
be directly visualized by a change in the color of the stained spheroid
tumor tissue from purple (physiological pH) to blue (low pH), as indicated
by the digital photographs shown in Figure 1a. In addition, the boundary between low pH and physiological pH
within the spheroid mass could be accurately determined using optical
microscopy (see Figure 2b).Both PMPC25PDPA62NBM0.13 and PMPC25PDPA59NBC0.08 probes were
able to detect pH changes within the living tissue (i.e., between
the inner and outer edges) over time in a similar manner to the positive
control performed using Glut-1 on fixed tissue (see Figure 3). It is worth emphasizing that, although PMPC-PDPAdiblock copolymer vesicles are rapidly uptaken by most cell types,[33,36] a significant fraction will nevertheless remain within the interstitial
tissue. When the PDPA block becomes highly protonated below approximately
pH 6.0, vesicle dissociation occurs. The resulting individual copolymer
chains are uptaken to a lesser extent than the vesicles, and a relatively
large fraction of the former species does not enter cells in hypoxic
(acidic) tissue. Although the copolymer chains acquire cationic character
and in principle may bind electrostatically to negatively charged
cell membranes, internalization does not occur unless the local concentration
of cationic charge density becomes high enough to disrupt the membrane.[59,60] The relatively small size of the copolymer chains[61] also makes endocytosis unlikely, and this process is further
hindered by the acidic environment.[62] Therefore,
these new biocompatible Nile Blue-based copolymer probes enable the
differential interstitial pH of live spheroids to be monitored continuously
and noninvasively in real time, as opposed to the indirect approach
required for fixed tissue based on Glut-1. This is important because,
although the interstitial pH decreases, the intracellular pH remains
at physiological levels in tumoral masses.[25,26,63] Importantly, no differential staining was
observed when the MCTS model was treated with PMPC25–PDPA61-NB0.13 (Figure 2). This
is consistent with our observation of a minimal spectral shift for
this copolymer over the pH range of interest (Figure 1a,c).
Figure 3
Monitoring the reduction in local pH within
multicellular tumor
spheroids (MCTS) over time using Nile Blue-labeled PMPC-PDPA diblock
copolymer vesicles. MDA-MB-231 breast tumor spheroids were grown on
ultralow adhesion 96-well plates. These MCTS samples were treated
with 1.0 g/L of PMPC-PDPA vesicles for 36 h and then imaged using
an optical microscope (Leica Caliper LS, 20X, which corresponds to
approximately 25% of the total area of an MCTS). Micrographs were
analyzed de viso (see Figure 2b) and the radii
of the hypoxic (blue, acidic) areas of the spheroids were compared
to the overall MCTS radii. The hypoxic/tumor radius ratio was monitored
over time for 5, 10, or 15 days. Immunolabeling of Glut-1 was used
as a control for fixed spheroid hypoxia. Data are expressed as mean
radius ratios for N = 3 independent experiments ±
SEM.
Dye-Labeled PMPC-PDPA Copolymers As Fluorescent
Probes of Intracellular
Environments
Figure 4a shows the fluorescence
intensity as a function of solution pH. For all copolymers, the emission
intensity increases at higher pH, but the onset of this stronger fluorescence
occurs between pH 4 and 5 for PMPC25PDPA59NBC0.08, whereas it is observed at around pH 6.5
(i.e., close to the PDPA pKa) for the
other two copolymers. Deprotonation of the PDPA block provides a hydrophobic
environment, which is known to increase the quantum yield of Nile
Blue.[43,45] The 700 nm/670 nm emission ratio is also pH-dependent (see Figure 4b). This
parameter decreases for PMPC25PDPA61NB0.13 at around the pKa of the PDPA
block. A hypsochromic shift from 660 to 575 nm in the emission spectra
(Figure S12 of the SI) is consistent with
formation of the deprotonated form of Nile Blue in the hydrophobic
vesicle membranes formed by the neutral PDPA blocks.[45] This dominates the emission spectra due to the increased
quantum yield, although the absorption spectra shows that there is
still a significant amount of protonated dye (see Figure 1).
Figure 4
(a) Fluorescence intensity vs pH for 1.0 g/L aqueous solutions
of Nile Blue-labeled PMPC-PDPA diblock copolymers recorded at an excitation
wavelength of 550 nm. (b) Fluorescence emission intensity ratio (700/670
nm; excitation wavelength = 550 nm) vs pH for 1.0 g/L aqueous solutions
of Nile Blue-labeled PMPC-PDPA copolymers. (c) Subcellular fluorescent
staining of organelles in live cells by Nile blue-labeled PMPC-PDPA
copolymers. Primary human dermal fibroblasts were treated with a 1.0
g/L aqueous solution of each of the three copolymers for 24 h. Fluorescence
micrographs were recorded to identify the subcellular signal of the
copolymers (λex (550 nm)/λem (670
nm); λem = 700 nm). Each copolymer signal was colocalized
with the following conventional subcellular markers: early endosome
marker for Rab-5 (CellLight Early Endosomes-GFP, Invitrogen) and lysosomal
marker (Lysotracker, Invitrogen). The amphiphilic PMPC-PDPA diblock
copolymer diffuses throughout the subcellular region, but accumulates
preferentially at membrane surfaces. The local pH of the lysosomes
is below pH 5, whereas the local pH of the early endosomes is around
pH 6–7. Thus the two Nile Blue comonomer labels report both
the presence and the chemical state of the copolymer, with the latter
being sensitive to the local pH due to the pH-responsive nature of
the PDPA block. In contrast, if the Nile Blue label is incorporated
as a chain transfer agent, rather than as a comonomer, then the copolymer
fluorescence is insensitive to the local pH.
(a) Fluorescence intensity vs pH for 1.0 g/L aqueous solutions
of Nile Blue-labeled PMPC-PDPAdiblock copolymers recorded at an excitation
wavelength of 550 nm. (b) Fluorescence emission intensity ratio (700/670
nm; excitation wavelength = 550 nm) vs pH for 1.0 g/L aqueous solutions
of Nile Blue-labeled PMPC-PDPA copolymers. (c) Subcellular fluorescent
staining of organelles in live cells by Nile blue-labeled PMPC-PDPAcopolymers. Primary human dermal fibroblasts were treated with a 1.0
g/L aqueous solution of each of the three copolymers for 24 h. Fluorescence
micrographs were recorded to identify the subcellular signal of the
copolymers (λex (550 nm)/λem (670
nm); λem = 700 nm). Each copolymer signal was colocalized
with the following conventional subcellular markers: early endosome
marker for Rab-5 (CellLight Early Endosomes-GFP, Invitrogen) and lysosomal
marker (Lysotracker, Invitrogen). The amphiphilic PMPC-PDPA diblock
copolymer diffuses throughout the subcellular region, but accumulates
preferentially at membrane surfaces. The local pH of the lysosomes
is below pH 5, whereas the local pH of the early endosomes is around
pH 6–7. Thus the two Nile Blue comonomer labels report both
the presence and the chemical state of the copolymer, with the latter
being sensitive to the local pH due to the pH-responsive nature of
the PDPA block. In contrast, if the Nile Blue label is incorporated
as a chain transfer agent, rather than as a comonomer, then the copolymer
fluorescence is insensitive to the local pH.Schematic representation of the basic principle for using Nile
Blue-labeled PMPC-PDPAcopolymer vesicles as pH-sensitive probes.
At low pH, both the PDPA block and the dye label are protonated, and
the copolymer chains are molecularly dissolved. Above pH 5–6,
deprotonation of the copolymerized Nile Blue labels (NBC or NBM) occurs.
Thus the PMPC25PDPA59NBC0.08 and PMPC25PDPA62NBM0.13 diblock copolymers exhibit a shift in both absorption and emission
(see Figure 1 and Figure 4). PMPC-PDPA labeled with unmodified Nile Blue behaves differently
because of the much higher pKa of this
fluorophore. Above pH 6.5, vesicles are formed in all cases because
the deprotonated PDPA block becomes hydrophobic. Exposure of these
vesicles to MCTStumor spheroids leads to their dissociation and colorimetric staining of the interstitial tissue due to the lower pH, because molecularly dissolved copolymer
chains are not readily uptaken by cells. However, if the tissue is
non-hypoxic the PMPC-PDPA vesicles remain intact at around physiological
pH. It is well-known that such vesicles are rapidly uptaken by many
cell lines.[35] The pH-dependent fluorescence of the NBM- and NBC-labeled copolymers (Figure 4) can be used to monitor intracellular compartments
because such PMPC-PDPA copolymers are known to be uniformly distributed
over all intracellular membranes.[36] Hence
the nature of the copolymer determines the spatial location of the
pH probe.Similar behavior is observed for
PMPC25PDPA59NBC0.08 but
the shift is only 40 nm in this
case (see Figure S12 of the SI). PMPC25PDPA62NBM0.13 has a maximum
emission ratio at pH 6.5; this is attributed to the additional band
in the emission spectrum of NBM (Figure S8 of the SI), which enhances the fluorescence intensity at 700 nm.However, in situ formation of the vesicle membranes provides a
hydrophobic environment that shifts the maximum emission wavelength,
which offsets this effect. This leads to an overall reduction in emission
ratio above pH 6.5 (see Figure 4b). Nevertheless,
the observed shift in emission due to the more hydrophobic local environment
is significantly less for NBM and NBC than for NB. PMPC-PDPA vesicles
are readily uptaken by cells and become uniformly distributed within
membrane organelles.[33,36] As shown in Figure 4c, exposure of cells to both PMPC25PDPA59NBC0.08 and PMPC25PDPA62NBM0.13 led to colocalization of the 700
nm signal with lysosomes (pH < 5). In addition, early endosomes
could be detected using the 670 nm signal (pH 6.0–6.5). The
higher relative ratio observed at around pH 6.5 of PMPC25PDPA62NBM0.13 allows other intracellular
regions to be visualized, as shown in the merged image. PMPC25PDPA61NB0.13 could not be detected
at 700 nm (Figure 4c), due to the relatively
weak fluorescence of this polymer at this wavelength. Instead, the
670 nm signal was uniformly distributed within the cell, regardless
of the pH of the subcellular localization. This indicates the uniform
localization of this copolymer, as previously observed with rhodamine-labeled
copolymers.[36]
Conclusions
In
summary, Nile Blue-based vinyl monomers act as spin-traps, retarding
living radical polymerizations. Nevertheless, labeled polymers can
be prepared by adding the dye label at high polymer conversion, albeit
with relatively low labeling efficiency. Such Nile Blue labels can
be incorporated into PMPC-PDPAdiblock copolymers, which then self-assemble
to form biocompatible vesicles at physiological pH. These copolymers
exhibit variable absorption and fluorescence emission depending on
their local pH. Importantly, they can be utilized for imaging pH gradients
within live tumor models, as well as for probing intracellular microenvironments.
This principle is summarized in Figure 5. The
advantage of this new probe is that the nature of the copolymer determines
its biological fate, while the fluorophore reports on the local pH.
In contrast, the cellular uptake and intracellular localization of
small molecule probes is mainly dictated by their hydrophilic/hydrophobic
balance. Thus, uptake of hydrophobic molecules by cells is usually
rather slow and inefficient.[64−68] In view of the wide range of pathological conditions that are characterized
by a pH imbalance, such copolymers are expected to have a broad range
of applications. Finally, such copolymer vesicles can also encapsulate
both hydrophilic and hydrophobic drugs[36,69] which suggests
their potential use as theranostic agents.
Figure 5
Schematic representation of the basic principle for using Nile
Blue-labeled PMPC-PDPA copolymer vesicles as pH-sensitive probes.
At low pH, both the PDPA block and the dye label are protonated, and
the copolymer chains are molecularly dissolved. Above pH 5–6,
deprotonation of the copolymerized Nile Blue labels (NBC or NBM) occurs.
Thus the PMPC25PDPA59NBC0.08 and PMPC25PDPA62NBM0.13 diblock copolymers exhibit a shift in both absorption and emission
(see Figure 1 and Figure 4). PMPC-PDPA labeled with unmodified Nile Blue behaves differently
because of the much higher pKa of this
fluorophore. Above pH 6.5, vesicles are formed in all cases because
the deprotonated PDPA block becomes hydrophobic. Exposure of these
vesicles to MCTS tumor spheroids leads to their dissociation and colorimetric staining of the interstitial tissue due to the lower pH, because molecularly dissolved copolymer
chains are not readily uptaken by cells. However, if the tissue is
non-hypoxic the PMPC-PDPA vesicles remain intact at around physiological
pH. It is well-known that such vesicles are rapidly uptaken by many
cell lines.[35] The pH-dependent fluorescence of the NBM- and NBC-labeled copolymers (Figure 4) can be used to monitor intracellular compartments
because such PMPC-PDPA copolymers are known to be uniformly distributed
over all intracellular membranes.[36] Hence
the nature of the copolymer determines the spatial location of the
pH probe.
Authors: Jong-Ho Kim; Daniel A Heller; Hong Jin; Paul W Barone; Changsik Song; Jingqing Zhang; Laura J Trudel; Gerald N Wogan; Steven R Tannenbaum; Michael S Strano Journal: Nat Chem Date: 2009-08-24 Impact factor: 24.427
Authors: Marzia Massignani; Irene Canton; Tao Sun; Vanessa Hearnden; Sheila Macneil; Adam Blanazs; Steven P Armes; Andrew Lewis; Giuseppe Battaglia Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-05-03 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Xiaohe Tian; Sophie Nyberg; Paul S Sharp; Jeppe Madsen; Nooshin Daneshpour; Steven P Armes; Jason Berwick; Mimoun Azzouz; Pamela Shaw; N Joan Abbott; Giuseppe Battaglia Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2015-07-20 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: James D Robertson; Jon R Ward; Milagros Avila-Olias; Giuseppe Battaglia; Stephen A Renshaw Journal: J Immunol Date: 2017-03-13 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: J Madsen; R E Ducker; O Al Jaf; M L Cartron; A M Alswieleh; C H Smith; C N Hunter; S P Armes; G J Leggett Journal: Chem Sci Date: 2018-01-15 Impact factor: 9.825