Literature DB >> 11161367

Manual asymmetries in the preparation and control of goal-directed movements.

P E Mieschke1, D Elliott, W F Helsen, R G Carson, J A Coull.   

Abstract

The primary purpose of this experiment was to determine if left hand reaction time advantages in manual aiming result from a right hemisphere attentional advantage or an early right hemisphere role in movement preparation. Right-handed participants were required to either make rapid goal-directed movements to small targets or simply lift their hand upon target illumination. The amount of advance information about the target for a particular trial was manipulated by precuing a subset of potential targets prior to the reaction time interval. When participants were required to make aiming movements to targets in left space, the left hand enjoyed a reaction advantage that was not present for aiming in right space or simple finger lifts. This advantage was independent of the amount or type of advance information provided by the precue. This finding supports the movement planning hypothesis. With respect to movement execution, participants completed their aiming movements more quickly when aiming with their right hand, particularly in right space. This right hand advantage in right space was due to the time required to decelerate the movement and to make feedback-based adjustments late in the movement trajectory. Copyright 2001 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11161367     DOI: 10.1006/brcg.2000.1262

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Cogn        ISSN: 0278-2626            Impact factor:   2.310


  30 in total

1.  Inhibitory control of reaching movements in humans.

Authors:  Giovanni Mirabella; Pierpaolo Pani; Martin Paré; Stefano Ferraina
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-04-25       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Interlimb differences in control of movement extent.

Authors:  Robert L Sainburg; Sydney Y Schaefer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-04-28       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  An investigation into manual asymmetries in grasp behavior and kinematics during an object manipulation task.

Authors:  Christian Seegelke; Charmayne M L Hughes; Thomas Schack
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The cost of moving with the left hand.

Authors:  Jonathan Vaughan; Deborah A Barany; Tristan Rios
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Upper limb asymmetries in the utilization of proprioceptive feedback.

Authors:  Daniel J Goble; Colleen A Lewis; Susan H Brown
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-26       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Manual asymmetries in visually primed grasping.

Authors:  Lari Vainio; Rob Ellis; Mike Tucker; Ed Symes
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-02-18       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Hemifield or hemispace: what accounts for the ipsilateral advantages in visually guided aiming?

Authors:  David P Carey; Jonathan Liddle
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-08-18       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Explicit knowledge about the availability of visual feedback affects grasping with the left but not the right hand.

Authors:  Rixin Tang; Robert L Whitwell; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Coordination of digit force variability during dominant and non-dominant sustained precision pinch.

Authors:  Ke Li; Na Wei; Shouwei Yue; Dominic Thewlis; Francois Fraysse; Maarten Immink; Roger Eston
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Two agents in the brain: motor control of unimanual and bimanual reaching movements.

Authors:  Tomohisa Asai; Eriko Sugimori; Yoshihiko Tanno
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.