Martin K Walz1, Harald Groeben, Piero F Alesina. 1. Klinik für Chirurgie und Zentrum für Minimal Invasive Chirurgie, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus der Universität Duisburg-Essen, Henricistrasse 92, 45136, Essen, Germany. mkwalz@kliniken-essen-mitte.de
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Stimulated by the concept of Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES), minimizing the access even further has become a new trend in minimally invasive surgery. We compare our recently described new method of endoscopic single-access adrenalectomy with the conventional retroperitoneoscopic approach in a matched-pairs study. METHODS: Fifty single-access retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomies (SARA) were performed in 47 selected patients suffering from Conn's adenomas (n = 20), pheochromocytomas (n = 15), Cushing's adenomas (n = 6), and other diseases (n = 6). For SARA, a single 2-cm skin incision beneath the 12th rib was used. Following creation of the retroperitoneal space with the rigid endoscope, dissection was carried out single-handed. Another 47 patients served as control group; they were treated by the traditional retroperitoneoscopic three-port approach (CORA). Patients were matched with respect to gender, body mass index, diagnoses, tumor size, and tumor site. RESULTS: Mortality was zero and no major complications occurred in both groups. SARA was completed in 41 cases (86%). The overall complication rate was 8.5% in SARA and 6.4% in CORA. Operative time was longer for SARA (56 +/- 28 min) than for CORA (40 +/- 12 min) (P < 0.05). Postoperatively, pain medication was administered in 47% of SARA patients and in 75% of CORA patients (P = 0.01). Mean hospital stay was 2.4 +/- 0.7 days (SARA) and 3.1 +/- 1.2 days (CORA) (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Because feasibility and safety of SARA could be demonstrated in a large group of selected patients, this surgical technique may represent a new milestone in minimally invasive endocrine surgery.
BACKGROUND: Stimulated by the concept of Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES), minimizing the access even further has become a new trend in minimally invasive surgery. We compare our recently described new method of endoscopic single-access adrenalectomy with the conventional retroperitoneoscopic approach in a matched-pairs study. METHODS: Fifty single-access retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomies (SARA) were performed in 47 selected patients suffering from Conn's adenomas (n = 20), pheochromocytomas (n = 15), Cushing's adenomas (n = 6), and other diseases (n = 6). For SARA, a single 2-cm skin incision beneath the 12th rib was used. Following creation of the retroperitoneal space with the rigid endoscope, dissection was carried out single-handed. Another 47 patients served as control group; they were treated by the traditional retroperitoneoscopic three-port approach (CORA). Patients were matched with respect to gender, body mass index, diagnoses, tumor size, and tumor site. RESULTS: Mortality was zero and no major complications occurred in both groups. SARA was completed in 41 cases (86%). The overall complication rate was 8.5% in SARA and 6.4% in CORA. Operative time was longer for SARA (56 +/- 28 min) than for CORA (40 +/- 12 min) (P < 0.05). Postoperatively, pain medication was administered in 47% of SARA patients and in 75% of CORA patients (P = 0.01). Mean hospital stay was 2.4 +/- 0.7 days (SARA) and 3.1 +/- 1.2 days (CORA) (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Because feasibility and safety of SARA could be demonstrated in a large group of selected patients, this surgical technique may represent a new milestone in minimally invasive endocrine surgery.
Authors: M K Walz; K Peitgen; M V Walz; R Hoermann; B Saller; R M Giebler; F Jockenhövel; T Philipp; C E Broelsch; F W Eigler; K Mann Journal: World J Surg Date: 2001-06 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Martin K Walz; Piero F Alesina; Frank A Wenger; Anastasios Deligiannis; Eduard Szuczik; Stephan Petersenn; Andreas Ommer; Harald Groeben; Klaus Peitgen; Onno E Janssen; Thomas Philipp; Hartmut P H Neumann; Kurt W Schmid; Klaus Mann Journal: Surgery Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Sean A Castellucci; Paul G Curcillo; Phillip C Ginsberg; Salim C Saba; Jamison S Jaffe; Justin D Harmon Journal: J Endourol Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 2.942
Authors: P Miccoli; A Pinchera; G Cecchini; M Conte; C Bendinelli; E Vignali; A Picone; C Marcocci Journal: J Endocrinol Invest Date: 1997 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Pier Francesco Alesina; Jakob Hinrichs; Beate Meier; Kurt W Schmid; Hartmut P H Neumann; Martin K Walz Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2011-09-21 Impact factor: 3.445
Authors: Dimitrios Stefanidis; Melanie Goldfarb; Kent W Kercher; William W Hope; William Richardson; Robert D Fanelli Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2013-09-10 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Martin K Walz; Laura D Iova; Judith Deimel; Hartmut P H Neumann; Birke Bausch; Stefan Zschiedrich; Harald Groeben; Pier F Alesina Journal: World J Surg Date: 2018-04 Impact factor: 3.352